Edward Thorndike discovered operant conditioning
"As he conducted a series of experiments based around the test subject, a cat, learning how to traverse a puzzle box. The experiment was set up so that the hungry cat was locked in a cage while a dish of food waited just outside of it. There was a series of levers and mechanics the cat had to operate in order to unlock the cage and retrieve the food.
What Thorndike found as a result of these studies was that the cat slowly and over time learned the precise steps required in order to be released from the locked cage. This was a slow and gradual process which suggested that the cat did not suddenly and fully understand how to unlock the cage. Instead, the cat learned, through trial and error, the steps required for the cage to be unlocked.
From this famous experiment, Thorndike established the law of effect which defines the relationship between a behavior and a response. In essence, if a certain action or behavior had a positive effect on the test subject, there was more of a reason for the subject to perform it again. On the other hand, if a behavior had a negative effect, it was less likely to be performed in the future. This provided the basis for our modern understanding of operant condition which is learning based on the association of consequences with behavior.
Operant conditioning did not enter the popular stage of psychology and become fully detailed until the work of a famous psychologist named B.F. Skinner. His special contraption dubbed a Skinner box, embodies all of the basic elements of operant conditioning, basically, it was a box that held a lever that was pulled in order for the animal inside of it to get food. A reinforcer is any product or action that causes pleasure in the subject, while reinforcement is the process of the subject receiving the reinforcer. In the instance of a Skinner box, the food pellet acts as the reinforcer while the animals receiving the food is reinforcement. Reinforcement can further be split into positive reinforcement and negative reinforcement.
Positive reinforcement is defined as any action which adds something pleasant to the environment of the subject, such as giving food or providing heat in a cold room. Negative reinforcement is the process of removing unpleasant conditions from the environment of the subject. An example of negative reinforcement is eliminating a loud noise that is constantly in the environment In addition to reinforcement, punishment is another process that can be used to shape the behavior of a test subject. Punishment, overall, is affecting behavior by using unpleasant consequences and like reinforcement; it can be split into two categories. Positive punishments is when unpleasant conditions are used on the subject.
For instance, if every time a mouse pulls a lever, it is given a small shock to discourage it from doing so, a positive punishment was used. Negative punishment is the removal of a pleasant condition already present, such as taking away food whenever the animal pushes a lever. In general, it is very easy to confuse the names of these different processes. A simple trick to remember them correctly is to remember that the first of the two terms refers to whether something is added or taken away from the subject. When the term begins with positive, something is added. When the term begins with negative, something is taken away. The second term defines whether the overall process is pleasant or unpleasant for the subject.
Reinforcement is positive while punishment is negative. Overall, Operant Condition is distinctly different from classical condition. while classical conditions involve shaping one's behaviors based on the responses provided by the system the subject is in. "
This is my work, I am moving it here for better management.
여긴 내 블로그지? ^^ 내맘대로 글좀 씁시다.
Affiliate Marketing Success Secrets Revealed
Online marketing is also known as online advertising, Internet marketing, digital advertising. However, you chose to call it, online marketing is any form of online promotional techniques that are used to deliver a message to consumers in order to drive sales via electronic commerce (or e-commerce).
Thanks to the new digital age, online marketing is able to reach more customers at a faster rate. Companies are able to build up their reputation and status online through various forms of online marketing.
Typically, online marketing will see an advertiser put an ad on another company’s website in order to drive traffic back to their site and see these clicks converted to measurable sale leads.
The click to conversion rate is where the money is made in online marketing. However, now there are many more techniques in online marketing that advertisers, or anyone with a website really, can use to make a profit.
As more and more people around the world are using the Internet on a regular basis, the potential to reach a larger audience with online marketing is huge. Advertisers are now able to target their advertising to the audience they want, allowing them to have greater sales than they ever could with traditional advertising mediums, like newspaper, radio, television and magazines.
So I've been post now on Steemit here and things have basically been going OK but I have some questions as to the arbitrary limitations on TAGS.
First you must put a TAG at least one TAG; WHY?
Two, there is a limit on TAGs, only 5 TAGs are allowed; WHY?
3, why can you not use capital letters in a TAG; WHY?
4th, you can use a number if and only if it is preceded by a letter so the TAG 911 or 420 is not allowed; WHY
I have a B.S. in Computer Science and these limitations are just so arbitrary and seemingly meaningless.
I hope some one will comment as to they it is necessary and a GOOD IDEA to code in these limitations.
Thank You, as always please like, share, vote, COMMENT! and follow me @lsk464
Photoshop to WordPress migration helps in building an SEO friendly, tailor-made, user-friendly, and full-fledged site. Numerous individuals think about employing an accomplished and experienced developer to get a proficient looking site developed. The skill set of a web developer is broad and thus, it is a decent choice to hire a highly proficient developer for your website conversion job. https://goo.gl/BUahlc
For every grain of sand on this planet there are different ways of approaching a challenge. I have always preferred a systematic approach that focuses on building a firm foundation.
In the case of game development, for me it always starts with getting serialization out of the way, so that's what I'll discuss in this post, and then in an upcoming post (or set of posts depending on how long it gets) I will walk through creating the serialization system based on what I discuss here.
The great thing about these foundational systems like serialization is that once you write it, you will be able to reuse it on all of your future projects. There may be some slight tweaking here and there, but in general it will be something that will be with you throughout your life as a coder.
This post won't go over any code, but will introduce you to the concept of serialization and the options you have with Unity.
When developing any type of application, whether it is a game in Unity, a mobile app or desktop app serialization is one of the first things that comes to mind that needs to be addressed. Serialization is the process of taking an object in memory and storing its state (by state I mean the current values the object's member variables hold) to a file or stream. Deserialization is the reverse process, reading data from a file or stream and re-creating an object with the data from that file or stream.
A Note about Unity and .NET
Unity technically doesn't use .NET; it uses an open source version of .NET called Mono. Additionally, Unity has made some modifications to the vanilla version of Mono so it makes upgrading the version of Mono a more involved task than usual. In fact, the modified version of Mono that Unity uses is based on .NET 2.0 (the latest version of .NET is 4.5). Newer versions of .NET have more serialization options, but we will have to make do with what Unity comes with.
Serialization in .NET 2.0
Even in .NET 2.0, the .NET API provides two intrinsic forms of serialization; binary and XML. Binary takes an object in memory and represents it as an array of bytes in a binary file or stream. XML takes an object in memory and represents it as XML in a text file or stream. When writing data to a text file it is important to consider the encoding of the text; the most common type of encoding is UTF-8.
Fortunately, there is one that seems to do a really, really good job that is also open source, used with an MIT license. The project is called FullSerializer, created by Jacob Dufault. The Full Serializer code can be downloaded or cloned from here:
Choosing a Serializer
Unity itself does provide an alternative called a Scriptable Object. The benefits are that it can serialize and deserialize any class in the Unity API. Binary and XML serialization can't. Additionally, binary and XML serialization (at least in .NET 2.0) don't not intrinsically support serialization and deserialization of classes using the IEnumerable<T> interface.
The catch with Scriptable Objects is that you can't, at least by normal means, save data to a Scriptable Object at runtime. This makes it unusable for a player save game feature, for example. Another drawback would be if the game design calls for an in-game editor; the player will not be able to save their data to a Scriptable Object.
A Scriptable Object is fine if you only need to read data in at runtime. In our judgment, however, it makes no sense to use Scriptable Objects for this one scenario and another system for the rest (like saving and loading a game).
We are big fans of Full Serializer. It is open source, licensed under the usual MIT license and we have not run into anything that it hasn't been able to serialize and/or deserialize. It really is impressive.
For binary data, we run the object through Full Serializer to get a JSON string representing that object, then convert the string to an array of bytes. The binary serializer may not be able to serialize every type of object, but it can always serialize a string which is what Full Serializer gives us.
Why am I Writing about this Now and not Later?
So why am I writing at length about serialization first? Because having a plan for serialization is part of the foundation of any application that will be saving data, loading data or transmitting data. If you can take your objects in memory and convert them to data that can be saved (serialized) and loaded (deserialized) you are well on your way to being able to create not only your game but custom editors as well. You are also on your way to being able to create your own high level networking system utilizing Unity's low level API or a completely different system (in the case you want to use websockets instead of UDP, for example). It is an important step. We consider it a foundational step before doing anything else.
So the first thing we are going to do is we are going to write a Serialization Manager, that will serialize objects into JSON strings using Full Serializer and then either save that string out to a file or convert it to a byte array and save that out to a binary file. Likewise, the Serialization Manager will be able to read those files from disk and create those objects with their values in tact.
We haven't gotten to the code yet but after this primer on serialization we will jump right in, so stay tuned.
Freeskiing is the purest freedom.
My name is Pete Oswald, I am a freeskier and adventurer from New Zealand.
I travel around the world skiing in the most beautiful locations I can find on Earth. My passion is scaling mountains and skiing down them. I choose the path on my walk up the mountain, then, I choose which path I want to fly down the mountain. I am limited only by my own ability, endurance, fear and of course gravity. There is almost never any other humans for miles around other than the company I choose, and seldom can I ever see any any evidence of humanity on the landscape.
There are no influences, no pressures, no constraints other than those that I impose on myself or those of the natural environment in which I am existing in that moment.
This how I like it. This is what I call freedom.
Photos by Sophie Stevens & Gus Hurst respectively. Skier: Pete Oswald @freeskier
Looks like my parents were right. Greater brain power is tied to having a thicker cerebral cortex. UCLA researches have found that people who eat fish more regularly develop larger cortexes. Straight from the source:
"If you eat fish just once a week, your hippocampus—the big memory and learning center—is 14 percent larger than in people who don't eat fish that frequently. 14 percent. That has implications for reducing Alzheimer's risk," Raji said. "If you have a stronger hippocampus, your risk of Alzheimer's is going to go down."
"In the orbital frontal cortex, which controls executive function, it's a solid 4 percent," Raji said. "I don't know of any drug or supplement that's been shown to do that."
This news is vital toward understanding how to prevent dementia/Alzheimer's in older folks and how to give children the best start in life. If it is delicious and makes me a genius, then I'm all in!
너무 피곤하다.. 아...
The Fallacy of the "Legalize and Tax Cannabis" initiatives: Insights from Jack Herer
(Article by ElectroPig von FökkenGrüüven)
Note: I originally wrote this several years back, but the essential messages contained still hold true, and to be honest, nothing has really changed, except for governments taking more control over our decisions (surprised?), and corporations quickly taking their pole positions to be sure THEY win the "fiat debt collection" race, whether we make any headway or not. Hopefully, at least some of it will make sense to you.
The core of the matter is one that most people refuse to acknowledge: The best way to end any given problem is not to make it bigger, or make it worse, or make it more costly, or more complex and unwieldy, but to simply END the problem. Crazy, eh?!? d=^o
One of these days, we'll figure that out...and then we'll see positive, beneficial changes start to happen. Maybe. I guess. We'll see. (Well, I'm not holding my breath...)
Jack Herer's Final Speech (Video): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4ldCLNjbf8
"I don't want to fucking give this United States
government one fucking dollar of taxes..."
-- Jack Herer, "The Emperor of Hemp", September 12th, 2009
(Portland Hempstalk Festival--his final speech.)
Full Article @ http://overgrow.ning.com*
(*The Overgrow The World web site no longer exists, but remnants can be found on the WayBackMachine if you're REALLY that interested...)
3 Step Solution:
I have listened and understood the words of the late Jack Herer, and I am amazed how few people who say they believe in what Jack was saying truly understand the real reasons why he so horrified at the idea of creating new cannabis taxes. Let me explain quickly: THEY ARE NOT NEEDED AT ALL! As a matter of fact, nothing could be further from the truth!
Now I'm sure that many of you don't believe me. If that is the case, then you also didn't understand what Jack meant, or perhaps you simply weren't paying attention, choosing to hear what you agreed with and ignoring what you didn't understand, or simply weren't interested in.
The first "ignored fact" is that the vast majority of the "illicit market" for cannabis is underground, hence, completely untaxed. There is a small fallacy to this statement, however, as even those "underground economies" still purchase their supplies, tools and equipment from "legitimate businesses" and those businesses all pay taxes of one form or another. Cannabis growers order pizza, buy gas, hire electricians and plumbers, et cetera. In this admittedly roundabout way, cannabis already is taxed, albeit to a very small degree in comparison to the total size of the market as it stands, and to the potential which is known to exist.
Let's say that cannabis/hemp prohibition were repealed today, and it was done so without the creation of any new tax codes specifically for cannabis. Most think that this would be a bad thing, as it wouldn't be "exploiting the market" without creating new tax codes, new agencies, new enforcement regimes. Unfortunately, the people who believe that have been lied to, and it's time that they learned the truth.
In actual fact, if cannabis prohibition were repealed today and taxes weren't considered in the equation in any way, it would still be beneficial to society in terms of "wasted resource savings" alone. We'd save money on policing, of which estimates range that between 40-60% of all police costs are directly due to "drug prohibition." Logic follows that with police not bogged down with grandmothers taking a puff to slow their glaucoma, they would then be able to concentrate their resources on combating real crimes. Things like rape, murder, fraud, home invasion and theft, assault and battery, arson, financial crimes, environmental crimes (of which cannabis/hemp prohibition is one of the leading causes, in fact), and many more REAL crimes with REAL victims.
Taken a step further, lawyers would then be freed up to work on real crimes as well. (Yeah. The ones with victims NOT created by the words on pieces of paper, or the "enforcers" of those statutes themselves!) So would prosecutors. So would judges, court stenographers, prison staff and more. Without locking away non-violent "criminals" who have harmed noone else--and this is the scary part for corporations--the "warehousing of otherwise productive humans for profit" would suddenly become far less profitable for the prison-industrial complex to continue, and prohibitionary statute development might begin to fade. With less "legal reasons" to imprison people for essentially minding their own business, more people would not have the lives and futures destroyed.
So let's say that there were no new taxes created upon the repeal of cannabis/hemp prohibition, and we ONLY consider the tens or hundreds of billions SAVED by no longer wasting time attacking people in their homes for possession or for growing a few plants for their own consumption. Are not those billions of dollars saved a tremendous enough benefit to justify the immediate repeal of cannabis/hemp prohibition? Could saving those billions of dollars not be immediately transferred into lower taxes, or public debt reduction? Would those savings alone not be of tremendous, immediate and long-term social value?
Now let's consider the tax idea on it's own merit.
With the repeal of cannabis/hemp prohibition, there would immediately follow the creation of new businesses to exploit what is widely known to be a global market for cannabis and hemp products. Each of those businesses would be subject to business income taxes that currently do not exist. Without a single character added to business tax statutes, the net result would be the establishment of "new revenue" from those "new businesses."
Of course, those businesses would need people to man storefronts, deliver products, develop products, design packaging, grow the raw materials, process the raw materials, et cetera. These jobs would all be legitimate jobs in the real job market. Each of those jobs would be subject to existing income tax statutes. It's not hard to see how those "new jobs" would in turn be utilized as "new tax revenue sources" which previously did not exist. Again, without a single line of new tax code written, a brand new revenue stream has been obtained.
Each of those new employees and businesses would need supplies, equipment, computers, energy sources, and services. All of those businesses and individuals would then use their incomes to purchase those items or services they needed, either to operate or enhance their businesses, or simply to make their lives at home a little better. All of those products would be purchased at existing retailers and/or wholesalers that exist in the current "legitimate marketplace." All (or the vast majority) of those purchases would be subject to sales taxes at state/provincial and federal levels. Again, not a single comma added to the existing statutes required, but "new revenue" has effectively been attained.
Now let's take the cannabis market ITSELF.
All of those newly created and legitimate businesses would provide products that people either wanted or needed, be they for medical purposes or for recreational uses. All of those products would then be subject to state/provincial and federal sales taxes. With each sale would then come "new revenues" which do not exist today. Again--are you starting to notice a pattern yet?--without the addition of a single line to any existing tax codes.
The Fallacy of "New Government Regulatory Jobs"
People keep being told that "new jobs" will be created in the "new regulatory framework" that "will be needed", but they obviously haven't thought this through. Some have partly thought it through, thinking that since a percentage of those worker's incomes will be clawed back by income taxes--say 25%--that means that those jobs are "cheaper" than "real jobs". That's actually not quite right.
When you look the "real economy", or in other words, the economy from which all government income is derived via the millions of tax codes which exist to take our incomes from us all, any position in this "real economy" is one which is subject to taxation, and therefore, is generally to be considered a contributing position.
On the other hand, when you look at "government jobs" which are wholly funded by "real people" with "real jobs" in the "real economy", every government position which exists--no matter what country or what level of government--is a drain on society, and must be so, as "we hired them to work for us."
Now let's take a simple example that we've all heard a million times: "Joe The Plumber."
If Joe was working in his own shop, or for someone else in their business, he would be a contributing factor in the "real economy" in the amount of taxation on his income, we'll use 25% for illustration purposes. This means that 25% of his income is diverted to "public employees and projects" needed for society to function as it currently exists.
Now let's take Joe's situation if he were a government employee...let's say he's employed by the local Public Utilities Commission. Now Joe's income is wholly funded by tax dollars, and thus, is a drain on society. We've established an income tax rate of 25%, so we can now say that Joe is "cheaper" because now his services now only cost us 75% of what they would, had he remained in his private sector job.
Here is the "minor error" in that logic: Joe has moved from the "real economy" to the "government economy". In making that move, the "real economy" has lost 100% of a "real job", while the government has gained an employee "at a discount of only 75% of their private sector wages." When you add that up, you see quite clearly that Joe's "new job" is effectively now a 175% loss to society as a whole.
Joe's still making the same amount of money. We're still paying him the same amount of money when he does his work...but now he is NOT contributing to the "real economy" at all, while he is draining 75% of his wages from unapportioned taxation of the people who are forced to pay his salary, whether they partake of, or benefit from, his services or not.
Unfortunately, this also applies to every "equivalent government position" that exists in the world. Accountants cost 175% of what they would cost in the "real economy." So do welders, secretaries, cafeteria cooks, lawyers...ALL of them! If they work for the government, they are at a much higher cost than their equivalent "real world" positions in the real economy.
We need to keep this in mind whenever we hear talk of " new regulations" because that almost always means "new regulatory bodies", and that DEFINITELY always means "new government employees" which are going to cost us dearly if we allow such things to occur.
If we are forced to accept some form of taxation in order to move closer to the full repeal of cannabis/hemp prohibition, so be it...let's move a little closer...but the second we have a positive change under our belts, we must NOT become complacent! We must continue to fight for the full repeal of cannabis/hemp prohibition until the batttle is decisively won.
Once we have some "half-assed reasonable legislation" in place, we can guage what are the worst parts of those enacted bills and target them one by one until they're all gone, and then, we will have our own freedom, and freedom for what is arguably the most important plant known on this planet.
At the Hempstalk Festival, during Jack Herer's final public speech, he said (among other things):
"I don't want to fucking give this United States government one fucking dollar of taxes..."
Obviously, he understood my thinking...or perhaps, I simply learned enough to come to an understanding of his.
What about you?
EDIT: I have since come up with the complete solution to the perils of prohibition in THREE WORDS:
If you remember only three words in your lifetime, THOSE are the ones that WILL end cannabis/hemp prohibition. IF we are intelligent enough to use them.
If we continue to be led by propagandists and prohibitionists into accepting ever-longer-names for prohibition, while believing we are "moving closer to freedom", we'll never get there...it'll just keep getting more complex, more costly, and more damaging to society as a whole...as it has for decades already.
If we allow our politicians to "reschedule" cannabis, this COULD mean an outright statutory BAN on ALL cannabis use, medicinal or otherwise, for the length of time it would take "to conduct safety studies." We already know that if they keep finding proof cannabis is non-toxic, anti-oxidant, neuroprotectant, et cetera, we also already know that these "safety studies" will be completed in an absolute minimum of 4-6 years, to an absolute maximum of...NEVER!
"Decriminalization" is NOT repeal. It's still illegal.
"Legalization" simply tells the politicians and courts that we believe the fix to bad legislation conceived of in fraud can only be fixed not by deleting it from the recored entirely, but by making it more complex...but keeping it all on the books for future "quick-n-easy" readoption when prison investors want higher revenues to do their profit-taking from.
"Re-legalization" is just two letters prepended to the above.
"Tax and regulate" tells OUR EMPLOYEES that "we owe them new taxes for not wasting our money attacking us." If we keep buying into the scam, they'll get it, too!
"Regulate like [insert commodity of the hour here]" is just another way to justify the creation of a new regulatory body, hire new "government employees", raise taxes, lower rights and freedoms, all while telling the wilfully ignorant population that "they are free." They ain't. They won't be.
"REPEAL" means: The statutes are GONE. Deleted. History. Erased. Terminated. Removed from the "law" journals. NEVER TO RETURN.
The ridiculous proposition that "if we want it legal again, we have to create new taxes" is also a prime example of idiotic propaganda foisted upon a wilfully ignorant population. Only two seconds of thought tells you the truth of the situation...we do NOT need to "appease our employees" when we finally force them to stop wasting OUR money. Not wasting all those billions of dollars every year should be--and IS--reward enough to everyone all on it's own!
When we find out we've got a crooked mechanic who's been charging us for spark plug changes on every visit that we didn't really need, and were nothing more than a waste of OUR money...we don't praise them and give them permanent bonuses, do we? So where did the idea come from, that in order for our employees to simply do their job with a little more brainpower behind their actions, that we need to give them more money and hire more people? Reality has to sink in eventually, folks! Even through the infinitely thick skulls of "politicians." They might be as dense as the core of a neutron star, but they still have ear holes! SO START SPEAKING UP!!!
Either we DEMAND the full repeal of prohibition, or we will continue on with it forever, just with a different name, and higher taxes...and let's face it, folks: OUR EMPLOYEES will be completely happy to rename what they're doing to us and call it whatever we want to call it, if we're dumb enough to allow it to continue. Are we really so blind as to STILL not see the truth for what it is?
Want it over? MAKE it over!
It really is just as simple as that.
Unfortunately, that didn’t happen.
What did happen was that the two choices for the lesser evil this year, came down to: slightly more fascist (Trump) versus slightly more communist (Clinton).
But, the key takeaway is that neither candidate wants to change the system in any dramatic way.
While they spoke about “creating jobs,” no one pointed out that the government actually can’t create jobs… it can only steal from some people and give to others (although Trump wins here with his idea of lowering corporate taxes).
While they spoke about poor black neighborhoods, no one said that the “war on drugs” is the single biggest cause of problems in those communities. Nor that the other biggest cause of problems in poor areas are the Federal Reserve and the government’s regulations and growth-impeding taxation. Nor did they seem to notice that the most dangerous areas all have the most restrictive gun control laws.
They both spoke about the threat of ISIS… but no one brought up that ISIS was created by the CIA and other Western intel facilities and is still funded and backed by the CIA. And, certainly, no one spoke of shutting down the CIA.
They spoke about all the problems in the Middle East… nearly ALL caused or funded by the US government and CIA. And both had a solution… more war.
In fact, the only way that the US government can “make America great again” would be to shut down immediately, and neither candidate would ever conceive of the notion.
So, aside from it all being a bizarre circus, there is nothing truly new with either candidate. All will continue just as the elites intend.
Here at TDV, we have said for over a year that Killary Clinton will win come November, if she can keep walking. And, this debate didn’t change our opinion.
Presidential elections aren’t really elections so much as selections, anyway. George Soros, a high level employee of the elite, has already said Hillary is going to win the popular vote by a landslide. Here’s his full quote:
I think it all – it’s going to lead to a landslide for Hillary Clinton in the popular vote, not in the electoral vote, because there, paid political announcements will have a big role. And so the electoral thing will be closer. But the popular vote will be a landslide because she is campaigning for the general elections, whereas the Republicans are fighting for the primary.
One big reason for a Hillary win is because of the funding that keeps pouring in. And that funding is based on her obvious, stated determination to make more wars around the world, which the military-industrial complex is eager to do. That’s why Hillary is receiving so much funding from corporate America. Trump has hurried to say, as a result, that he too is eager to confront “terrorism” abroad as well.
National security seems to be a big issue for these two. Less so, the nearly $20 trillion US national debt, which is fast-sinking the country. Yet the national debt received only a few minutes of conversation as opposed to nearly 15 minutes on Barack O’Bombers birth certificate.
A few days ago, the federal debt of the US passed the $19.5 trillion mark. In fact, for the 2016 fiscal year that ends on the eve of the Jubilee Year, the US government’s debt growth of $1.36 trillion will be the third biggest annual increase ever.
This is the only chart needed at the debate last night. And the only question that should have been posed is, “What are you going to do about that?”
Unfortunately, the reason that question was not asked is because there is absolutely nothing anyone can do at this point.
When the $20 trillion debt and over $80 trillion in liabilities (money already spent but that is promised to be paid in future) is accounted for, it adds up to over $250,000 for every man, woman and child in the US. Or, more than $1 million for every family of four.
This is mainly what all the billionaires who have been running from the stock market and into gold the last few months have been alluding to.
It’s the rock and the hard place. Take your pick.
And when it implodes, in what they call a “debt jubilee”, it will bring on a crisis and crash that Jim Rogers, who founded the Quantum Fund with George Soros, warned us about in August. He issued a blunt statement that, “A $68 trillion ‘Biblical’ collapse is poised to wipe out millions of Americans.”
We aren’t talking decades either. At best we are talking a few years. It could even begin to happen as soon as next week when the Chinese yuan is added to the IMF’s SDR basket, the day before the end of the Jubilee Year.
We’ve been telling you for years to prepare… and those preparations have also included massive gains, including a 200% gain in the TDV Premium newsletter’s portfolio in the last year.
It’s still not too late, but if you have done nothing to prepare yet, you are really leaving things to the last proverbial minute!
Last summer, we made a call just before the August crash that earned us 4,500% in three days. And, TDV’s Senior Analyst has just made a very similar call again in a September 16th alert to Premium subscribers. You can access that immediately here.
While we certainly favor Donald Trump’s stance versus Hillary’s on many things… especially in regards to reducing taxes and regulation (which should both be reduced to zero)… it is already too late.
Before anything can be salvaged there is going to have to be a washing away, of sorts. Likely in the form of a debt jubilee, which will cause damage to the economy, financial and monetary systems that no one could possibly imagine.
It’s possible it won’t happen next week. It may not happen next month. But it will happen soon enough. If you aren’t already preparing for it, you may already be too late.
And, one thing is clear: Neither the Donald nor Hillary are going to be able to salvage it.
스팀에 너무 딱딱한 얘기만 있는것 같습니다.
댓글에는 재미있는 짤이나 가벼운 주제의 어떠한 댓글, 드립도 관계없습니다.
인상적인 드립을 치신 분에게는 해당 포스트의 보상 스팀과 스팀달라를 보내드리겠습니다.
가상화폐니까...거래얘기도 관계없고 이런 저런 얘기나 좀 하면서 긴장을 풀어보죠.
욕은 하지 말구요.
지는 닥치는 대로 쓰리연타로 플래그 먹이고...정말 평화롭네요.
Planning to establish a WordPress multisite? A WordPress multisite is a perfect choice when you need to keep up various WordPress sites through a solitary purpose of access. WordPress developers at WordSuccor will work with you right from consulting you on WordPress multisite development to bringing out the whole thing together. Know more about us here: https://goo.gl/3I2zc3
The day after tomorrow began the National Day holiday, where you plan to go, you do not ask me where, as early as a few days ago, I said, I'm going fishing, just received some text messages, even phishing promotion ads, this is the first Time to receive this ad, the content is
to his water hotel fish, free food and free nesting services.
If there are fish, you do not have ads will also be known, because people will find fishing, a friend asked me where to have fish fishing, according to my fishing data tracking, fish very good there are two places, one China Zhejiang Thousand Island Lake, the old fishing raft fishing row, and the other is the Guizhou Anyi Wanfeng Lake fish very well, all year round fish are very good fishing
如果有鱼钓，你不用广告也会有人知道，因为钓鱼人很会找，有朋友向我打听全国的鱼情，据我的钓鱼数据跟踪，鱼情非常的有两个地方， 一是中国浙江千岛湖，老余的水上钓鱼筏排， 另一个是贵州安义万峰湖鱼情很好， 一年四季鱼都很好钓
Today began to windy, looked at the weather the next few days, although there are typhoons, but does not affect travel, to rest a holiday :)
All images come from my own，Fishing point is located in Hubei Yongan Reservoir
It's been 15 years since the major attack on our country by the so-called terrorist whereby 19 hijackers executed a very elaborate plan with no outside assistance what so ever or so we are told. The results of this plan is that 3 major buildings in NY City's World Trade Center area where brought down to the ground in what looks like a controlled demolition but was actually the results of either the plans crashing into the buildings or by office fire, again or so we are told. Not to mention the continuous wars and evaporation of our constitutional rights and let's not forget the unbelievable invasion of our privacy via the NSA spying monstrosity.
There has been official stories released as to exactly how these plans were executed.
Here is one of them summarizing all of it in only 5 minutes thanks to James Corbett of the CorbettReport.
After 15 years there has now been countless YouTube videos discrediting this
Official Story many be very credible people. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth and Pilots for 9/11 Truth and many others. Here is a video about a physics teacher who with no budget and no fancy equipment or technology was able to question the
Official Story and actually get
them to change their story because it was clearly a lie. I hope you will watch this slightly longer video (about 1hr.) from 911truthncdotorg called
The Physics of 9/11
I hope you will enjoy my posts and like, share, vote, comment and follow me @lsk464 for more eye opening reports of our slowly deteriorating police state of a country.
Hello Steemitsonians, today, I continue on this Prostate Care Diet for Today blog looking at food and diets that can significantly help improve, prostate health. Like I have always said, this is not for men only, it is also for women who want to do more to help their spouses have their prostate situation under control. I have been reading quite a bit on this, particularly the book
Healthy Eating: The Prostate Care Cookbook and my findings will be posted on this blog.
The prostate is that part of every man that needs proper monitoring to prevent the development of prostate cancer. The lower the Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) level in the blood, the better for the health of the prostate. Although there isn't a specific normal or abnormal level of PSA in the blood, but most doctors have in the past considered PSA levels of 4.0 ng/mL and lower as being normal. Proper care is needed to maintain these levels.
Devilled Mackerel with Mint and Tomato Salad (Image credit: Cook Food Eat Food)
Preheat the grill to a hot temperature. Mix up all the spices, sugar, mustard powder and a little salt with the red wine vinegar and oliv oil.
Now, carefullr remove any remaining bones from the mackrel fillets. With a sharp knife, make four shallow incisions across thee skin running down each fillet.
Brush the fillets on both sides with the devil marinade and place on a baking tray. Now place thee tray under a hot grill for about 5 minutes until nicely brown.
For the salad, combine the tomatoes, mint leaves, and onion in a bowl and squeeze over the leemon juice.
To serve, now pile the salad on to a plate and place the mackrel on top.
Devilled Mackerel with Mint and Tomato Salad (Image credit: Cook Food Eat Food)
Mackerel is a great source of oily fish and selenium. Selenium has been found through research to be very potent against cancer. There is a body of evidence to suggest that not only may a higher selenium intake reduce the risk of prostate cancer, it may also be able to suppress the spread of cancer outside the prostate.
The tomatoes are a huge source of lycopene. Lycopene and lycopene containing foods like when eaten in good quantity can help lower the risk of developing prostate cancer.
Now, you can add this to your diet to significantly improve your prostate health.
In case you missed earlier posts, you can catch up with the articles here:
Good day! I want to offer to give their children attention. Cold evenings make vegetable crafts.
Let's start to do with apples Kucinich and cauliflower bear,working with children together.
Добрый день! Я хочу предложить, чтобы дать своим детям внимание. Холодными вечерами сделать овощные поделки.
Давайте начнем делать с яблоками гусеницы и цветная капуста медведь,работающих с детьми вместе.