> not the one with anxiety medication and hypochondria. You are .

I am not. I took that medicine for 6 months almost a decade ago.

> You clearly were anti-science because you denied basic mechanisms of zoology such as survival instincts.

Lol! Ok! At least I understand what you mean. Ok, you win the argument, I was "anti-science". Lol.

> That's the least that will happen if you dare to use the science and steemstem tag ever again. That's a promise. Stick to your "philosophy" bullshit. Don't try to milk credibility from something that you are inept in every possible way.

Ok, this has gotten really personal. You are a sick person. Furthermore, AS ALWAYS, you don't reply to anything I said that proves you're wrong.

An INTELLECTUALLY HONEST person would go back to that initial comment you made on my post, that first paragraph, and add parentheses and "edit" above it, and say something like "I was actually wrong that Alex stole his ideas about the survival instinct from CFT". Or something to that effect.

Now who's intellectually dishonest? Proof bitch, not just words.