>The main point with capitalism is the fact that capitalism must indeed have hierarchies which are unjustified such as relationship between the work and the boss.

Do you think if I mow my neighbours lawn and he washes my car that one of us is the boss and one the worker? 

Also If I make such a voluntary trade with my neighbour ,would you find it ok to stop me from making that choice?

> it is incredibly disasterous to let people setup their own police forces that have authority over other people

Those "police forces" would not have the "right to rule" as the government version has now.
If I become the so called police force in a free world, I would only have the right to do what I as a normal human being am allowed to do, because I  am a normal human being. What clothes I wear, or shiny things (badge) I carry does, not change that.

The police forces are owned by government. Not by the taxpayers. If you want to know who owns something one can look at who has the last word over what is done with it.
Government makes the laws so government is the owner.

>Ontop of that the government is quite nessecary for the capitalist economy as without it and the police there would be no one to enforce private property, which is what most of capitalism is based off.

With government you can never have private property, because you always have to pay the extortion money. ( or else your protectors come to your house (police)) You merely rent it, it's their property they are the owner. It doesn't matter to them how long you worked for it to pay it of or how long it took for you to build. (can you see how the police works for government?)
For documenting things like this, you don't need a government.
Also if you have property in a free society you are responsible for the protection. You can't make your neighbours pay (via taxes) for the defense of your property.

One more thing about owning. Now everything, and even everyone is owned by a group of people with guns, that own everything that lives withing some lines on a piece of paper some people, long ago, have drawn with magical inc. 
If you can not decide what you can,  put in your body, if you can not decide who you invite in your house (for instance a so ( by the government) called illegal, if you can not decide to sell lemonade without a permission... and they punish you, or kill, you if you do not eventually obey or pay them. Then you own nothing, and they own everything including you.

I don't believe you need a state for anarchy or any centralized positions that give authority of power.

Anarchists are never in a position of power because we reject power.

 What is power?

Threat, coercion, control, violence.

The Marxist doctrine that we need more state (socialism) in order to have no state (Communism) makes as much sense as saying we need to put gasoline on the fire in order to stop the building from burning down.

I think it's about time we faced the possibility that Marx invented a system that lured those who wanted to get rid of the state apparatus into a new form of radical Statism that promises a stateless society that never comes.

Communism was the bait to get all the freedom minded people on the socialist track of radical Statism, instead of that of the real revolution of ethics and freedom that is anarchism.

The state is the eternal enemy of freedom, ethics, abundance and security.

What? Me?  I am not a robot.
Lol.  Whaddaya mean spam?
Joy

The series I watched...they rescued people marked .
Is that not the same show?
Joy