RE: To win the information war we must have ZERO-CENSORSHIP by ankapolo

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @logiczombie/to-win-the-information-war-we-must-have-zero-censorship

· @ankapolo · (edited)
100% agree on scientific papers. However, even then I can see misinformation sneaking in through the cracks of language and marketing - through omission or clever wording - they can effectively mislead you even if the content is scientifically accurate. 

As for copyright, I see it differently...  i have come to the conclusion that the only true property that we hoomans ever possess is our mind and our ideas. And therefore I value ideas and content as being the sovereign property of its creator. And unless we create other incentives (non-monetary) to entice people to share this property, I think this idea of ending copyright so early would infringe on the rights of ownership of the creator. Currently, by law, copyrights end after the author dies +70 years (to benefit his legacy). and I would be willing to grand that we can do away with the inheritance of legacy... but this would also trample on some basic libertarian principles...  so the question is, should we tax (or even steal) people's intellectual property for the benefit of society? or should we respect the individual sovereignty of their minds?
👍  
properties (23)
post_id82,140,991
authorankapolo
permlinkq1rpq1
categoryinformationwar
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-11-30 05:54:06
last_update2019-11-30 06:01:12
depth1
children5
net_rshares52,513,414,220
last_payout2019-12-07 05:54:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,118
author_reputation6,150,195,042,752
root_title"To win the information war we must have ZERO-CENSORSHIP"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@logiczombie ·
> I think this idea of ending copyright so early would infringe on the rights of ownership of the creator.

Only corporations can afford to defend copyrights.

As an individual, you can't afford to defend your "original idea" even if you're in the right.

This is the exact opposite of the original intent of copyright law.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id82,222,856
authorlogiczombie
permlinkq1w5tr
categoryinformationwar
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-12-02 15:42:48
last_update2019-12-02 15:42:48
depth2
children4
net_rshares464,938,526
last_payout2019-12-09 15:42:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length323
author_reputation3,686,945,064,519
root_title"To win the information war we must have ZERO-CENSORSHIP"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars0
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@ankapolo ·
The reality is that we cannot defend any ideas. The only thing copyright grants to the creator is ownership of the distribution of a particular creation (not idea). Copyright is limited, and if one wants to extend that defense they might need to ask for trademark.  However, I'm not sure i understand your position clearly... are you in favor of stronger copyrights or are you in favor of limiting them to 20 years for the sake of benefiting society?
👍  
properties (23)
post_id82,373,377
authorankapolo
permlinkq2681v
categoryinformationwar
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-12-08 01:56:21
last_update2019-12-08 01:56:21
depth3
children3
net_rshares49,502,252,310
last_payout2019-12-15 01:56:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length450
author_reputation6,150,195,042,752
root_title"To win the information war we must have ZERO-CENSORSHIP"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@logiczombie ·
I'm suggesting that if you write a book or a song or a movie, 20 years is more than enough time for you to make a reasonable profit.

And the copyright or patent should only apply to the individual creator (as originally intended).

Corporations don't need copyrights or patents, because they can simply out-produce or out-distribute their competitors (free-market-economics).

Copyrights and patents were intended to protect the "little guy", they were never intended to be a Weapon of the Fat Cats.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id82,413,430
authorlogiczombie
permlinkq2901j
categoryinformationwar
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-12-09 14:06:54
last_update2019-12-09 14:06:54
depth4
children2
net_rshares464,938,526
last_payout2019-12-16 14:06:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length500
author_reputation3,686,945,064,519
root_title"To win the information war we must have ZERO-CENSORSHIP"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars0
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)