RE: "Sounds Good So it Must be Accurate" - My Scientific Mind by baah

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @kyriacos/re-baah-baah-re-kyriacos-hard-sciences-are-successful-because-they-deal-with-the-soft-problems-soft-sciences-are-struggling-because-they-deal-with-the-20181110t054838855z

· @baah ·
Vaccines have no hard science to back them up. More than 90 percent of our biology is bacterial, fungal and viral DNA. The numerous viruses that are in our bodies fly in the face of how the immune system with its lock and key anti-bodies and "information on viruses" is postulated to work.


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4160575/

What I mentioned about polio being isolated 20 years before we could even begin to DREAM of doing so flies in the face of any rational person. Only delusion explains your brushing it off as if I'm speaking in tongues.

>A serious consequence of these facts is that an antibody against a defined antigen, e.g., a whole purified protein or a peptide, could bind to structurally related antigens that have a completely or partially different amino sequence (molecular mimicry). This means that, predicting an antibody has high affinity for the immunizing antigen is extremely difficult if not impossible.

As for the article your arrogance won't let you read, let alone consider I could quote entire sections that bring the cynicism you have to its knees, but it's there for your digestion whenever you think less of yourself.

Posted using [Partiko Android](https://steemit.com/@partiko-android)
properties (22)
post_id65,788,070
authorbaah
permlinkbaah-re-kyriacos-re-baah-baah-re-kyriacos-hard-sciences-are-successful-because-they-deal-with-the-soft-problems-soft-sciences-are-struggling-because-they-deal-with-the-20181110t061044088z
categorysteemstem
json_metadata{"app":"partiko"}
created2018-11-10 06:10:45
last_update2018-11-10 06:10:45
depth3
children9
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-11-17 06:10:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,240
author_reputation12,429,236,291,513
root_title""Sounds Good So it Must be Accurate" - My Scientific Mind"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@kyriacos · (edited)
There are plenty of studies with hard evidence to back vaccines. Just not all of them. 

I have the read the article and others that are similar. It all comes down to the same thing. Intellectual sophisms that might get a naive girl wet from an arm-chair philosopher that hasn't gotten laid for a while.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id65,789,666
authorkyriacos
permlinkre-baah-baah-re-kyriacos-re-baah-baah-re-kyriacos-hard-sciences-are-successful-because-they-deal-with-the-soft-problems-soft-sciences-are-struggling-because-they-deal-with-the-20181110t070159543z
categorysteemstem
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["steemstem"]}
created2018-11-10 07:02:00
last_update2018-11-10 07:02:18
depth4
children8
net_rshares12,791,034,589
last_payout2018-11-17 07:02:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length303
author_reputation150,969,386,046,457
root_title""Sounds Good So it Must be Accurate" - My Scientific Mind"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@baah ·
Please show us some of the plenty.

You read an article that takes at least a good half an hour to read and minimum some couple of hours to follow through the references in turn even though you dismissed it entirely by not saying anything about it and then when mocked to read it you answered right after I replied that you've read it, lol and dismissed it with "all comes down to sophism." in effect avoiding making any specific or substantiative claims for a double dismissive generalization. Lol, what an intellectual phony.

I provided a study that demonstrated how impossible or outright unbelievably hard it is to create a vaccine based on the interaction between antibodies and viruses/the body and you haven't anything to say about it. I also brought up the fraud of vaccines by pointing out the isolation of polio decades before the electron-scanning microscope which obviously didn't raise an eyebrow.

Posted using [Partiko Android](https://steemit.com/@partiko-android)
properties (22)
post_id65,815,135
authorbaah
permlinkbaah-re-kyriacos-re-baah-baah-re-kyriacos-re-baah-baah-re-kyriacos-hard-sciences-are-successful-because-they-deal-with-the-soft-problems-soft-sciences-are-struggling-because-they-deal-with-the-20181110t172328906z
categorysteemstem
json_metadata{"app":"partiko"}
created2018-11-10 17:23:30
last_update2018-11-10 17:23:30
depth5
children7
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-11-17 17:23:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length981
author_reputation12,429,236,291,513
root_title""Sounds Good So it Must be Accurate" - My Scientific Mind"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@kyriacos ·
I don't reply to nonsensical jargon. 

If you want specific replies to that article then you have to do it using your own words. Be precise. Anyone can throw links around.

In science, and what happened with polio, was done under systematic observation even if we did not completely understand the mechanism. 

The study you provided does not say that vaccines do not work. It simply says that the mechanism is more complicated than previously thought. 

A vaccine in general triggers the immune system to create antibodies. In other words, the composition doesn't have to be that specific but rather encompass a range in which the body can react to it. 

Also stop bringing anti-vax debates to different forums to make a point. You clearly don't understand biology either and you try to play smart ass because you saw some other idiot pointing this out as evidence. 

Steemit has enough anti-vaxxer morons. We don't need more.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id65,826,323
authorkyriacos
permlinkre-baah-baah-re-kyriacos-re-baah-baah-re-kyriacos-re-baah-baah-re-kyriacos-hard-sciences-are-successful-because-they-deal-with-the-soft-problems-soft-sciences-are-struggling-because-they-deal-with-the-20181110t223855242z
categorysteemstem
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["steemstem"]}
created2018-11-10 22:38:57
last_update2018-11-10 22:38:57
depth6
children1
net_rshares12,536,721,353
last_payout2018-11-17 22:38:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length927
author_reputation150,969,386,046,457
root_title""Sounds Good So it Must be Accurate" - My Scientific Mind"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@replichara ·
Dude, just study biology, join a lab, and perform experiments yourself. Then start teaching the biomedical community about how antibodies don't work.
properties (22)
post_id65,870,266
authorreplichara
permlinkre-baah-baah-re-kyriacos-re-baah-baah-re-kyriacos-re-baah-baah-re-kyriacos-hard-sciences-are-successful-because-they-deal-with-the-soft-problems-soft-sciences-are-struggling-because-they-deal-with-the-20181111t191417675z
categorysteemstem
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["steemstem"]}
created2018-11-11 19:14:18
last_update2018-11-11 19:14:18
depth6
children4
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-11-18 19:14:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length149
author_reputation2,623,547,241,873
root_title""Sounds Good So it Must be Accurate" - My Scientific Mind"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000