![soleildore.JPG](https://steemitimages.com/DQmR5a2BP59knx9bpfnT9VynfReb6W6WmCEZEPqYJzhL3ch/soleildore.JPG) In his long but interesting article « [The fallacy of endless economic growth](https://psmag.com/magazine/fallacy-of-endless-growth) », Christopher Ketcham recaps the arguments why we cannot continue business as usual. Solar coach is preparing an ICO to promote solar energy. You can participate to the pre-launch of TOPSOL on the Bitshares market. https://bitshares.openledger.info/market/TOPSOL_BTS We need more money to finance our marketing campaign until the beginning of the ICO, October 1st. What can I say to promote TOPSOL ? That it is more profitable to buy TOPSOL than to buy the shares of an oil company ? Of course, it is not. But what will become the profitability when the last tree will but cut, when the last river will be polluted, when the last fish will be catch up. You cannot eat money. It is correct to use ICO to finance solar projects ? When someone buy new tokens, of course he is expecting that the token will rise up. Should we use the tools of capitalism to fight capitalism ? The market of solar energy is huge, it will continue to increase. We use 24,000 TWh of electricity each year. Which arguments would you like to hear to buy TOPSOL ? * [Solar coach get fundings from a group of VIVA Crown holders](https://steemit.com/business/@chrisaiki/solar-coach-get-fundings-from-a-group-of-viva-crown-holders) * [Solar coach white paper V0.93 pre-launch progress](https://steemit.com/funding/@solarcoach/solar-coach-white-paper-0-93-pre-launch-progress)
post_id | 9,847,028 |
---|---|
author | chrisaiki |
permlink | should-solar-be-profitable |
category | ico |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "format": "markdown", "links": ["https://psmag.com/magazine/fallacy-of-endless-growth", "https://bitshares.openledger.info/market/TOPSOL_BTS", "https://steemit.com/business/@chrisaiki/solar-coach-get-fundings-from-a-group-of-viva-crown-holders", "https://steemit.com/funding/@solarcoach/solar-coach-white-paper-0-93-pre-launch-progress"], "image": ["https://steemitimages.com/DQmR5a2BP59knx9bpfnT9VynfReb6W6WmCEZEPqYJzhL3ch/soleildore.JPG"], "tags": ["ico", "business", "solar", "solarcoach"]}" |
created | 2017-08-11 10:03:33 |
last_update | 2017-08-11 10:03:33 |
depth | 0 |
children | 4 |
net_rshares | 861,700,479,802 |
last_payout | 2017-08-18 10:03:33 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 2.367 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.604 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 1,597 |
author_reputation | 19,005,919,649,684 |
root_title | "Should solar be profitable ?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
teamsteem | 0 | 371,001,067,698 | 2% | ||
kooshikoo | 0 | 67,543,137,286 | 100% | ||
oliverstoney | 0 | 2,193,174,210 | 45% | ||
anotherjoe | 0 | 24,868,502,597 | 2.4% | ||
cryptomancer | 0 | 35,656,546,433 | 13% | ||
okean123 | 0 | 11,981,482,102 | 45% | ||
lighteye | 0 | 7,039,764,848 | 15% | ||
steemprentice | 0 | 25,846,204,229 | 10% | ||
tradeqwik | 0 | 263,814,739,870 | 12% | ||
taskmanager | 0 | 29,375,062,401 | 45% | ||
fisteganos | 0 | 18,860,728,828 | 45% | ||
prizeportal | 0 | 1,962,294,074 | 45% | ||
solarcoach | 0 | 796,520,233 | 100% | ||
crown-holders | 0 | 111,826,729 | 45% | ||
head10 | 0 | 155,012,642 | 100% | ||
akareem | 0 | 221,426,996 | 100% | ||
kobiglow | 0 | 272,988,626 | 100% |
It is upvoted.
post_id | 9,847,081 |
---|---|
author | head10 |
permlink | re-chrisaiki-should-solar-be-profitable-20170811t100423519z |
category | ico |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["ico"]}" |
created | 2017-08-11 10:04:24 |
last_update | 2017-08-11 10:04:24 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 23,807,137,328 |
last_payout | 2017-08-18 10:04:24 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.077 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.002 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 14 |
author_reputation | 9,356,450,215,595 |
root_title | "Should solar be profitable ?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
chrisaiki | 0 | 23,807,137,328 | 100% |
Thank you.
post_id | 9,847,256 |
---|---|
author | solarcoach |
permlink | re-head10-re-chrisaiki-should-solar-be-profitable-20170811t100715848z |
category | ico |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["ico"]}" |
created | 2017-08-11 10:07:15 |
last_update | 2017-08-11 10:07:15 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-08-18 10:07:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 10 |
author_reputation | 2,137,962,089,502 |
root_title | "Should solar be profitable ?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
great informative post *upvoted*
post_id | 9,854,487 |
---|---|
author | akareem |
permlink | re-chrisaiki-should-solar-be-profitable-20170811t115953549z |
category | ico |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["ico"]}" |
created | 2017-08-11 11:59:54 |
last_update | 2017-08-11 11:59:54 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-08-18 11:59:54 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 32 |
author_reputation | 709,759,331,542 |
root_title | "Should solar be profitable ?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
Endless economic growth is actually normal thing, it is just not possible with the rates dictated by the capitalism-created archgreedy plutocracy crazed with profit.
post_id | 9,856,829 |
---|---|
author | lighteye |
permlink | re-chrisaiki-should-solar-be-profitable-20170811t123305697z |
category | ico |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["ico"]}" |
created | 2017-08-11 12:33:06 |
last_update | 2017-08-11 12:33:06 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 156,092,054,956 |
last_payout | 2017-08-18 12:33:06 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.399 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.133 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 165 |
author_reputation | 128,167,460,043,555 |
root_title | "Should solar be profitable ?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
photo-trail | 0 | 156,092,054,956 | 100% |