RE: What is property? Is it defined by consensus? by epic-fail

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @lukestokes/what-is-property-is-it-defined-by-consensus

· @epic-fail ·
If said "property" was acquired by ill-gotten means and unethical behavior ("Ninja Mine" ) then they are simply trying to find a way to "launder" STEEM into Tron. History will not be kind to Ned.
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id84,664,216
authorepic-fail
permlinkq66mem
categorysoftfork222
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.2"}
created2020-02-24 01:20:45
last_update2020-02-24 01:20:45
depth1
children2
net_rshares34,668,240,771
last_payout2020-03-02 01:20:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length195
author_reputation7,337,625,723,461
root_title"What is property? Is it defined by consensus?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@lukestokes ·
That's possible, but participation within Steem has always been voluntary. Those who didn't like the ninja mine chose not to participate.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id84,665,011
authorlukestokes
permlinkq66onv
categorysoftfork222
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.2"}
created2020-02-24 02:09:30
last_update2020-02-24 02:09:30
depth2
children1
net_rshares33,879,105,875
last_payout2020-03-02 02:09:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length137
author_reputation395,063,281,398,324
root_title"What is property? Is it defined by consensus?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@epic-fail ·
Yes, I see your point. Of course none of us are being forced to be here. However many people did not know about the Ninja Mine or are even savvy enough to understand it. Many just wanted to post their art, photos or stories and were marketed to by Steemit to post and get rewarded for their content. Stinc figured all of their deviousness would fade into the darkness and be forgotten. Stincs actions moving forward have been consistently misleading, full of mis representations, false timelines, false excuses and of course either very vague communication or no communication at all. 

I believe of the above infractions certainly justify the softfork and I'm glad you have agreed to support it while at the same time discuss the finer details of how this decision affects the integrity of our Blockchain. Our hand is forced by their lack of communication and lack of credibility and trustworthiness.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id84,665,518
authorepic-fail
permlinkq66pv0
categorysoftfork222
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.2"}
created2020-02-24 02:35:24
last_update2020-02-24 02:35:24
depth3
children0
net_rshares33,201,035,947
last_payout2020-03-02 02:35:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length901
author_reputation7,337,625,723,461
root_title"What is property? Is it defined by consensus?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)