Thank you :-)

> _Seems like you don't post too much :)_

I can spend time either on doing something or posting about doing something. I usually chose the former.

Thank you for conscious votes. :-)

What do you mean by "witnessed you"? :-)
If you mean by that: voting for me as a witness, then no, you didn't.

Steem is not an easy platform for newcomers, that's for sure. We, as a community, are making our efforts to improve on-boarding process but there's still a lot things to do.
You need to learn a lot before you will be able to use the platform and it's full potential but I think it's worth it.

As for voting for witnesses. No, you are not voting for me as a witness yet. You can do that by going to: https://steemit.com/~witnesses page.
Currently you are voting for @good-karma.
You can chose up to 30 witnesses if you like, but first I would encourage you to learn more about the platform and about witnesses to make a conscious votes. 

Good luck.

I think I would have few suggestions to add... and to remove :-)
Lets gossip on that on a steem.chat ;-)

<center>![best line of potatoes](https://steemitimages.com/DQmbGnY4VXMLcLkfojrS441AXQV1jLmHcMUQgkCUqQ6kyjC/potatoes.jpg)</center>
Do not be mistaken: having even the best line of potatoes ever doesn't make it a server-farm ;-)

Yes, of course, they are rewarded for the block production.
Please note that Steem =/= Steemit. That's important especially in this context. :-)

Yes, of course, reviewing witness votes is in each user best interest.

I disagree however that posting/voting is anything that distinguish good witnesses from bad witnesses. Tust me, I'm actually much more useful to the platform when I'm not posting :-)

But on the other hand I get the need of keeping touch with reality, and thus with community as a part of what is expected from witnesses on the social platform.

Main witness role is to produce blocks reliably. They really don't need to do more. The other question is whether those witnesses that don't do more than minimum should be voted higher than those who do.
But that's not the question for the witnesses.
That's the question that each user should ask himself.

> _But most certainly if you have the resources to fund or help the community, do it. The more you help the faster your funds grow as well. This is like helping the community and also helping yourself._

That's very true.

I have to agree there with both of you guys. If anyone is concerned with the stability and reliability (does availability fit into there somewhere?) of the network then some of you may be interested in helping me get some witness votes for <a href="https://steemit.com/witness/@justinadams/who-really-owns-your-steemit-data-the-community-seed-nodes-project-forever-nodes">my project</a>. It's aim is to establish more full rpc/consensus nodes for the steemit network to help reduce some of the strain by providing more resources and simultaneously decentralizing from all those privex nodes. No offense and i'm not saying anything meant to slander or subject myself to libel,  but most of the network's hardware is owned and operated by the top 50 witnesses and that's being modest. It's not my aim to compete. It'd honestly be in mine and everyone's best interest to play ball when it comes to things that I'd consider platform essentials (Nodes And Witnesses).  It's just simple decentralized load balancing. In my opinion, those things should be separated from the politics involved with high level witnessing even though it is essential that we all participate in some way whether we vote, or simply donate to projects that strengthen the community in this manner.  I'm fairly new to steem, but I have set up a few nodes as well as a witness without issue. It seems that the people that should be batting for projects like mine the most either will never hear about them, or try to silence them with a nice conservative downvote. Unfortunately, ignorance will not win out in this case and many have already begun to see the negative effects of a growing blockchain without proper contingency. I established my witness with the sole agenda of using it to finance  <a href="https://steemit.com/witness/@justinadams/who-really-owns-your-steemit-data-the-community-seed-nodes-project-forever-nodes">my project</a>  as I cannot maintain nodes on my salary however the necessity is plausible and duty calls.  I usually don't do these types of post response (forgive me if I'm longwinded) and writing is not my forte, but I read @yuriks2000 's reply and since @gtg concurred , it felt relevant. I don't use steemit to make money for my family. That is not what this is about for me. . . Yet. . .. Besides, I hate to say it, but It's been easier for me to make a living off of other treacherous, censored social media platforms that bring their own issues, but at the end of the day, they have overcome many of the core fundamentals that we have not from a technological standpoint including high redundancy. Even more importantly, they make it easy to obtain an account for new users making it easy for me to convert my current followers from one platform to another. . That in itself has been my biggest limiting factor here on steemit as it has made it thus far nearly impossible for me to make anything substantial using my current highly supportive (and paying) user base from those other networks. I do see other ways i'd like to help this network grow in the future and in the process perhaps earn the opportunity to become cash flow positive on it. But the technology and accessibility issues need to be addressed first indeed and I'm here to help. In fact, I'd LOVE to help. .  I have a background in software engineering, robotics, game development, web design, server admin. . It seems to me that the premise of steemit is to "break-out" from the norm when it comes to social platforms. They did that by making monetization more accessible but it doesn't stop there and this is evidenced by the many third party add-ons and adaptations made in it's favor. Many of them modifying it beyond just blogging (i.e. blocktrades, dtube, dsound).  I'm already here and i've already started to play my part but as @gtg said "if you have the funds or resources to help the community then do it". . I don't have the funds but i'm doing it anyways. I'm already vested with my time and my money so I'm not going anywhere, and hopefully with community support I can be as successful as you have been on this platform :P Again, it's not my intention to spread any rhetoric or knock anyone about the job they are doing or not doing. You were one of the first witnesses I voted for @gtg. Even though you are a top witness, I definitely have been unable to escape the massive contributions you have made to this network. Hats off to you!  But tell me something, @pumpkin ? 
![how come.gif](https://steemitimages.com/DQmYxCKJ3yENrmVh6aoSKuxZR1RMtpj34264qJgP5PH8khz/how%20come.gif)

Reciprocal?
Security and reliability of the platform you are using.
But no, you haven't voted for me as a witness.

Thank you :-)

Thank you :-)

Thank you :-)

I'm glad to hear that...
but are you aware that you are actually not voting for any of the witnesses?
Votes for witnesses is something entirely different than votes for their posts. Please refer to [Frequently Asked Questions](https://steemit.com/faq.html) to get some better idea about Witnesses and [voting for witnesses](https://steemit.com/~witnesses).

That's not really something witness related.
Witnesses are not in any special position to address such issues.

If highly staked  users are hurting the platform by their actions they are hurting themselves the most.

Oh Lord, thank you :-)