RE: Why whales are needed - and a proposal to insure the massive success of steemit, ie Subtractive Upvoting Gradient by jl777

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @aaseb/re-jl777-why-whales-are-needed-and-a-proposal-to-insure-the-massive-success-of-steemit-20160723t135300379z

· @jl777 ·
$1.29
most all the whales want what is best for the long term and my proposal will lead to a much better outcome than whatever short term gains they can get by self-upvoting within the whalepod

The more the whales giveaway, the more they will end up with. @berniesanders understands this and he is already creating a strange and wonderful galaxy around his "crazy" upvotings
👍  , , , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id215,410
authorjl777
permlinkre-aaseb-re-jl777-why-whales-are-needed-and-a-proposal-to-insure-the-massive-success-of-steemit-20160723t140329773z
categoryupvoting
json_metadata"{"users": ["berniesanders"], "tags": ["upvoting"]}"
created2016-07-23 14:03:30
last_update2016-07-23 14:03:30
depth2
children2
net_rshares937,999,897,132
last_payout2016-08-25 12:00:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.994 SBD
curator_payout_value0.294 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length369
author_reputation14,981,508,863,374
root_title"Why whales are needed - and a proposal to insure the massive success of steemit, ie Subtractive Upvoting Gradient"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (7)
@aaseb · (edited)
$0.06
I was thinking about another idea, give an upvote bonus to new comers or people who never won much and decrease that bonus for people who have already good earnings. In a way it's more or less the same.
👍  , , ,
properties (23)
post_id215,679
authoraaseb
permlinkre-jl777-re-aaseb-re-jl777-why-whales-are-needed-and-a-proposal-to-insure-the-massive-success-of-steemit-20160723t142507019z
categoryupvoting
json_metadata"{"tags": ["upvoting"]}"
created2016-07-23 14:25:21
last_update2016-07-23 14:26:36
depth3
children1
net_rshares52,387,072,185
last_payout2016-08-25 12:00:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.058 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length202
author_reputation470,134,608,167
root_title"Why whales are needed - and a proposal to insure the massive success of steemit, ie Subtractive Upvoting Gradient"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@jl777 ·
$0.06
some sort of pool that gets posts with the minimum amount of positive feedback at least a "minimum wage" level payout, yes this sort of thing. But the primary source of upvote revenues are the whales, so by preventing whale for whale upvoting, it would force them to upvote for non-whales.
👍  , , ,
properties (23)
post_id215,744
authorjl777
permlinkre-aaseb-re-jl777-re-aaseb-re-jl777-why-whales-are-needed-and-a-proposal-to-insure-the-massive-success-of-steemit-20160723t143031355z
categoryupvoting
json_metadata"{"tags": ["upvoting"]}"
created2016-07-23 14:30:30
last_update2016-07-23 14:30:30
depth4
children0
net_rshares52,408,263,098
last_payout2016-08-25 12:00:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.058 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length289
author_reputation14,981,508,863,374
root_title"Why whales are needed - and a proposal to insure the massive success of steemit, ie Subtractive Upvoting Gradient"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)