RE: Two proposed HF policy change for countering reward based abuses. by kyle.anderson

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @steemreports/re-kyleanderson-re-ausbitbank-re-transisto-two-proposed-hf-policy-change-for-countering-reward-based-abuses-20170717t180447346z

· @kyle.anderson ·
They are iirc. 

That does not stop someone from having anonymous accounts do their work. Delegation smart contracts could provide this as a service. There is always a way to self vote with vests you own. - unless not all vests are worth the same. 

There is **no** way to detect or prevent self votes. Period.
👍  
properties (23)
post_id7,481,050
authorkyle.anderson
permlinkre-steemreports-re-kyleanderson-re-ausbitbank-re-transisto-two-proposed-hf-policy-change-for-countering-reward-based-abuses-20170717t212625229z
categorysteem
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}"
created2017-07-17 21:26:24
last_update2017-07-17 21:26:24
depth4
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-07-24 21:26:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length310
author_reputation8,981,178,609,606
root_title"Two proposed HF policy change for countering reward based abuses."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)