Viewing a response to: @abit/re-liberosist-re-abit-re-liberosist-re-abit-benefits-of-pure-linear-reward-distribution-20170303t131711858z
If upvotes get curation rewards then maybe downvotes can get curation charges :) This disincentivises overuse of this, and shifts its use more towards negating clique-voting. Yes, and invert the sense of the scaling of the share of the curation charges. The most accurate downvotes get charged the least. I am not really up for making a post about this, I think that the curves for reward distribution become irrelevant when Steem's value goes up instead of down. Which may mean @abit's idea of a flat distribution may be superior, in the sense that it reduces complexity, which lowers administrative cost, leaving more for rewards. We just have to have a Steem asset that tends towards being deflationary, rather than as it is now, distinctly inflationary.
post_id | 2,078,842 |
---|---|
author | l0k1 |
permlink | re-abit-re-liberosist-re-abit-re-liberosist-re-abit-benefits-of-pure-linear-reward-distribution-20170303t174707704z |
category | curation |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["abit"], "tags": ["curation"]}" |
created | 2017-03-03 17:47:09 |
last_update | 2017-03-03 18:36:54 |
depth | 5 |
children | 2 |
net_rshares | 28,050,146,987,839 |
last_payout | 2017-04-03 20:55:33 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 4.417 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 1.472 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 759 |
author_reputation | 94,769,080,451,415 |
root_title | "Benefits of Pure Linear Reward Distribution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
abit | 0 | 28,025,715,037,878 | 100% | ||
reddust | 0 | 24,431,949,961 | 30% |
Now that's an interesting idea! 😄 Idea for next post maybe?
post_id | 2,079,017 |
---|---|
author | personz |
permlink | re-l0k1-re-abit-re-liberosist-re-abit-re-liberosist-re-abit-benefits-of-pure-linear-reward-distribution-20170303t181914608z |
category | curation |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["curation"]}" |
created | 2017-03-03 18:19:15 |
last_update | 2017-03-03 18:19:15 |
depth | 6 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 175,067,978,467 |
last_payout | 2017-04-03 20:55:33 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 61 |
author_reputation | 42,440,234,781,798 |
root_title | "Benefits of Pure Linear Reward Distribution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
l0k1 | 0 | 174,764,472,350 | 100% | ||
johnthehoan | 0 | 303,506,117 | 100% |
Great exchange guys. I think the inherent risk that comes with downvoting are enough of a disincentive against downvoting abuse.
post_id | 2,080,910 |
---|---|
author | teamsteem |
permlink | re-l0k1-re-abit-re-liberosist-re-abit-re-liberosist-re-abit-benefits-of-pure-linear-reward-distribution-20170303t235244597z |
category | curation |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["curation"]}" |
created | 2017-03-03 23:52:21 |
last_update | 2017-03-03 23:52:21 |
depth | 6 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 179,581,422,139 |
last_payout | 2017-04-03 20:55:33 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 128 |
author_reputation | 284,009,804,791,421 |
root_title | "Benefits of Pure Linear Reward Distribution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
l0k1 | 0 | 178,974,387,839 | 100% | ||
johnthehoan | 0 | 607,034,300 | 100% |