Very Interesing  blog Thanks @larkenrose

Great, upvoted and shared to almost 7000 people on twitter, hope this helps spread the word? Peace!

Thanks.  Great memes.  I am always one to add my dig in the ribs of big government.  The best way we all can do so is crypto!  I would donate but I am not paying a $30 fee to give you ten of fifteen bux 

Bitcoin = broken  (not fast, free and instant)

It is still hard to throw off the thoughts that the police are here to protect me.  Even though I have never seen that happen, and I have personally, or indirectly seen the abuses of police power.

I have been taught to believe in a system.
Its like I have been taught that geese lay golden eggs, when what really comes out of that hole is shit and more shit.  And logically there is nothing else that a govern-cement can do.  Even with the best intentions and the best people in charge.


Oh how I have been hoodwinked!

Great post!
Everybody should read this.
Upvoted and resteemed.

Unfortunately most of the people are brainwashed and they can't understand such things. Some of the disadvantages of watching alot of t.v.
Great insight about our society.

Shuts down 😂

Great article, with all the agencies and enforcer in place what would be a better solution to them? I believe anarchy has a place in our future but I feel there is transition time of libertarianism and transparency. Maybe a communities of tribes that agree to work together for a better life of more freedom and liberty. All voluntary of course. Any other ideas of how we could take responsibility and reinvent the way we live? @larkenrose

claim by larken, or presented by him: Ted Bundy; Responsible to 1 10 000th of the civilian deaths caused by the avarage US President.

Now why is that false? because the President does NOT do the actual killing, its the order followers that does it, as thus is the true issue here. Being something Mark Passio strongly points out.

The false belief, that there is sutch a thing s authority, comes secondary or in parrallel to that. Unless you choose to view both as being the same. (something it is to a sertain degree)

Qute from the article: "In fact, it would happen to you too, if you were given power over others, and were convinced that you had the absolute moral right to exercise that power"
Just as a point here, now what position deos this then put you @larkenrose in as someone  manny people listen to and regard as a form of authority? Because you say alot toa makes snes and is relevant, thus manny wil, based on that, and the fact that you do ahve a "following", deem most of not all of what you say as valid, even if some is not.

Something to keep in mind. (Im curious to see if Larken whould respond to this comment with that point fully in mind)

It's amazing how ignorant the masses are of history. Not even in the case of ancient history but most people don't have much knowledge of modern history. I guess they're just going to have to keep repeating it...

the government is silently responsible for rotting society

Good post. I lived in England for many formative years, and when I came to Australia it was a genuine shock to see a revolver strapped to the hip of an officer and have a wave of fear wash over me instead of what I was used to.
I think the LACK of firearms made them more human and approachable and more like they should be, peacekeepers. In turn, not having the firearm at their side made them less oppressive in their approach to a situation. 

I think ultimately we must recognise we all have one life to live with no-one having the right to oppress anyone else. Common law, a jury of peers and treating others as one would wish to be treated is all that is needed here for true innovation in society to be reborn.

You have a new follower, great write-up! Resteemed.

RESIST!

OK guys you talk about the police been brutal, now the most important and a bit aggressive question. Will you take responsibility for the safety of those who resist arrest? It is much more prudent not to resist the officer and then have your day in court. That advice is much more reasonable when explaining to folks that have never encountered a police situation. I explained to people that sometimes they may encounter a situation where a police officer has been called to investigate a complaint and the start of it is to respond, observe and interview people to see if there is a need for police action. Sometimes it is obvious and sometimes it isn't and may not involve the person being questioned. For the police officer to do the job they need an assessment. I would explain that the best course is to stay calm and answer the inquiries. If you were not a problem you most likely will not have a problem.

Well said. That's pretty much all they do...

Congratulations @larkenrose! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

[![](https://steemitimages.com/70x80/http://steemitboard.com/notifications/votes.png)](http://steemitboard.com/@larkenrose) Award for the number of upvotes

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click [here](https://steemit.com/@steemitboard)

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word `STOP`

> By upvoting this notification, you can help all Steemit users. Learn how [here](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/http-i-cubeupload-com-7ciqeo-png)!

I believe you're choosing the wrong responsable to blame but you're totally right about everything you say. Government as a type of political organization exists since Renaissance but every single type of organization before that went through similar corrumption. Civilizations are creating their own normes and punishes those who refuse to respect. We can also see that  in various primitive ones and trust me their values sounds even crazier. 
Social Contract written by Jean-Jacques Rousseau in 1762 shows us that every single type of human collective does that compromise we call social convention to live in "harmony". So I think the question should be if today's society's values are really compatible with our legislation and the way it's applied. 
Capitalism favors power gained from pecuniary interets and to preserve that for their own personal or oligarchic interests governments and their agents are becoming more and more oppressive. And it's indeed contradictory with it's own foundation because it's supposed to be most liberal and egalitarian way to acquire power. 
But I also have to admit that it's scares the hell out of me to go out of this secure zone because governments might be oppressive but who knows what would happen if we didn't "compromise" with governments "oppression". Either way let’s hope liberal economy and it’s « laissez-passer » (let them do) philosophy will evolve into something better then pure chaos for humanity !

While reading every word of your article, I was nodding yes with a smile, translating into how damn true this is.
I am wondering if psychologists are making the link between a politician and a psychopath...

Amen! I thought this didn't even need to be said! The state is nothing more than a gang of thugs forcing us to pay them for living. Expect existance, or expect resistance!

Scrolled pass the "this is government" crap that your post is Larken. 

Hey, no honey here?

How about the fact that Government and the Corporation masquerading as government are two different things?

http://www.annavonreitz.com/annavonreitz.pdf

AKA republican form of government, aka consent of the governed, aka sovereign, free and independent, aka anarchy that America was built on.