![](http://www.mrtru.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/mrt-vsego-tela.jpg)

Continuation, [beginning](https://steemit.com/system/@le0nid/medicine-and-physics)

Conventional - meets the requirements in connection with the views adopted in this period of time on its role and tasks.
It is believed that conventional medicine is purely scientific and therefore we know almost everything about the human body and its pathological processes. All other types of medicine are empirical, that is, not scientific, and we do not know what happens in the body during treatment, although a favorable therapeutic effect is noted. This is because the knowledge of all non-conventional types of medicine was collected empirically, but a scientific analysis was not carried out.
Generally speaking, there should not be such a division into different types of medicine. If something has a curative effect, it must be studied (subjected to scientific analysis), proven and included in the composition of conventional medicine. However, due to the lack of study of many effects, separation into different types of medicine is still taking place. Perhaps in the future there will be a merger of all types of medicine into one large effective and universal conventional medicine.
Conventional medicine in its nature and origin is European, recently strongly modernized American influence. We remember still German medicine with its specific hierarchical ladder. But where is the paramedic today, and who in general remembers what kind of post is this, even if in Germany the medicine is subject to American standards? The scientific nature of European medicine is explained only by the high development of Western technology. If, for example, China was ahead of Europe in scientific development, today, probably, Chinese medicine would be more scientific, ie, conventional and accepted for the main in most developed countries.
The reason for the absence of analytical medicine is the complexity of the object of our attention, which without the theory of systems can not be understood. It is in the incredible complexity of the body that the weakness and imperfection of modern medicine lies. Today, research methods of the patient's organism are extremely simple and primitive, although they use the highest technologies of modern science and technology. We just think that our opportunities are greater than they are. Many people think that by "glancing" with the help of ultrasound or computed tomography in the heart, we will see everything and eliminate all the problems. But "looking" in the heart, we will see only its anatomy, which in a living organism differs little from a corpse. And even if we "look" inside myocardiocytes, we will also see little that is significant that will help us to assess the causes of heart failure. For this, "look" is not to the anatomy of the organs, but to the function of the body systems, because even before anatomical changes, functional shifts primarily occur.
What does, for example, computer tomography give, even high-resolution? Just information that there is a defect in such and such an organ (infiltration, destruction, tumor, etc.), that is, information that many millions of cells are affected. But they are already amazed! And why they are amazed and what led to this defeat, computed tomography does not answer. In such cases, the doctor can only guess (to speculate), what could be the cause of this defeat. In this case, sometimes two doctors can give two different and even mutually exclusive conclusions. **This is intolerable...................................................................**