RE: Potential problems with App beneficiaries by macron

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @tarazkp/potential-problems-with-app-beneficiaries

· @macron ·
$0.13
Hey guys, I think there is a debate for sure on how to find the right mix between rising the reward for creators and platforms taking a cut to boost their development. I think mainstreaming Dapps would be the best for the whole steem ecosystem as it will bring more curators, hence more rewards. As someone said in the comments here, the question would then be: will the reward pool be large enough to reward larger audiences? Probably not and that's why SMTs are coming up (hopefully as soon as possible).
About curation rewards I think it is wrong to view it as a "commission" stolen from creators, it is on the contrary one of the main features of the steem vision i.e to reward the community for their work of detecting and "flagging" the quality content for others. To me this vision aims at establishing a new paradigm to the targeted advertising business where users personal data is indeed stolen to make massive profits for the GAFAM.
Finally about DTube, there is a misunderstanding here which is too bad as most of the article focuses on it (even though as you said it is just an example).  DTube does not take the beneficiary reward anymore, in fact it takes the cut but redistribute it to curators which was a move to test a new redistribution scheme in order to attract more curators hence more voting power to the benefit of creators, all the details are in DTube last post: https://steemit.com/dtube/@dtube/curation-and-economic-update
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id55,728,872
authormacron
permlinkre-tarazkp-potential-problems-with-app-beneficiaries-20180707t112655996z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit\/0.1","links":["https:\/\/steemit.com\/dtube\/@dtube\/curation-and-economic-update"]}
created2018-07-07 11:27:03
last_update2018-07-07 11:27:03
depth1
children2
net_rshares63,267,411,171
last_payout2018-07-14 11:27:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.095 SBD
curator_payout_value0.030 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,451
author_reputation36,869,450,645
root_title"Potential problems with App beneficiaries"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@tarazkp ·
I will get to this later if you don't mind, (away at the moment). It is good to know about @dtube however it doesn't really change much from what this post talks about. Many posters still don't know and for a highly rewarded organic poster, they are in the same boat. It is good if it attracts more organic voters through @dtube though but, even that isn't necessary is it? One will still get the curation bonus if voting through steemit.com or the like?

thanks for the reply.. i will return to it when back in the city :)
properties (22)
post_id55,818,198
authortarazkp
permlinkre-macron-re-tarazkp-potential-problems-with-app-beneficiaries-20180708t081416272z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["steem"],"users":["dtube"]}
created2018-07-08 08:14:00
last_update2018-07-08 08:14:00
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-07-15 08:14:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length523
author_reputation1,394,583,249,195,743
root_title"Potential problems with App beneficiaries"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@personz ·
> One person who was onboarded by a friend recently [...] didn't realize that it costs to use the apps, they didn't know what beneficiaries were at all.

This is the biggest problem, not that there is a cut taken, but that the information on it is not clear enough. In my view almost all apps are guilty of this, it needs to be much more prominent.

> DTube does not take the beneficiary reward anymore, in fact it takes the cut but redistribute it to curators which was a move to test a new redistribution scheme in order to attract more curators hence more voting power to the benefit of creators, all the details are in DTube last post

No, DTube _does still take the cut_ but it claims to redistribute it. DTube is still handling this cut, and the policy can change at any time. Be clear.
properties (22)
post_id55,956,384
authorpersonz
permlinkre-macron-re-tarazkp-potential-problems-with-app-beneficiaries-20180709t121437362z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2018-07-09 12:14:36
last_update2018-07-09 12:14:36
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-07-16 12:14:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length792
author_reputation42,440,234,781,798
root_title"Potential problems with App beneficiaries"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000