<center><a href='https://d.tube/#!/v/mediahousent/fq7zo2ek'><img src='https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmRT5cV9RrgZno3oJbuYTBFFbiUejjyEZP7TpC3eYXEJQQ'></a></center><hr>

It is a long-aged clash between Law and Morality. Nevertheless, they are two sides of the coin which co-exist as long as the human society is in existence.
The philosophy of Law in the real context won't be complete without the touch of morality.

Law is inconclusive, that is it is not capable of one definition or it does not have a single perspective or view to its approach.
Meanwhile, there are guidelines to which a society is organized or conducted. Hence, every society has its own moral standards and rules.

> ***According to Phil Harris, he defined morality as a code of beliefs, values, principles, and standards of behavior, which are visible among the social groups.***

Note however that, the concept of morality has been previewed as a different perspective of individuals about the rightness or wrongness of a particular form of behavior.

https://youtu.be/gjYLJAm9mrA
<sub> *a public nudity photo shoot by Spencer Tunick*</sub>

Technically, this video you just watched was repeated by the same photographer Spencer Tunick on the 9th July 2016. 
Well, I checked my casebook and I saw the fact of this present case to be in tandem with the case of Shaw v DPP [1962] A.C. 220. Where shaw was convicted for promoting sexual offenses amongst several charges which contravene Sexual Offences Act.


Whether the people in this video have practically lost their sense of dignity and respect for the human hood or they are just high on vodka, let's hear from you guys what you think?

Thanks for watching,
Best regards,
Sam.

<hr><a href='https://d.tube/#!/v/mediahousent/fq7zo2ek'> ▶️ DTube</a><br /><a href='https://ipfs.io/ipfs/QmdqnnPB8PLhJD9C9B8THYERNAuXAB5dWuPEJScRCGFhFE'> ▶️ IPFS</a>