RE: HF20 Update: Operations Stable by nonameslefttouse

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @smooth/re-nonameslefttouse-re-smooth-re-rest100-re-steemitblog-hf20-update-operations-stable-20181002t065944300z

· @nonameslefttouse ·
Creating the illusion of popularity is easy to see through.  

The creation of a new section:  *Peoples Choice*

When accounts voting match a certain criteria, the post moves up the ladder.  Minority accounts like those with the highest SP can vote, but their vote wouldn't count towards positioning, only rewards.  Small accounts virtually inactive aside from upvoting wouldn't count towards positioning.  Paid for votes wouldn't count towards positioning.  Only proven curators showing human behavior could contribute to positioning.  

Remember the 'active' tab?  That would be a nice feature to have back as well.  I don't think I'm the only one here who can have over 100 legitimate comments under posts and still go virtually unnoticed.
properties (22)
post_id63,507,039
authornonameslefttouse
permlinkre-smooth-re-nonameslefttouse-re-smooth-re-rest100-re-steemitblog-hf20-update-operations-stable-20181002t074930446z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["steem"]}
created2018-10-02 07:49:33
last_update2018-10-02 07:49:33
depth5
children2
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-10-09 07:49:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length742
author_reputation304,321,988,710,771
root_title"HF20 Update: Operations Stable"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@smooth ·
> Minority accounts like those with the highest SP can vote, but their vote wouldn't count towards positioning, only rewards. Small accounts virtually inactive aside from upvoting wouldn't count towards positioning. Paid for votes wouldn't count towards positioning. Only proven curators showing human behavior could contribute to positioning

Sounds good in theory but probably not one of those things can be reliably detected by an algorithm without people figuring out how to spoof it.

> Remember the 'active' tab?

Yes it got removed because it was so obviously manipulated.
properties (22)
post_id63,507,194
authorsmooth
permlinkre-nonameslefttouse-re-smooth-re-nonameslefttouse-re-smooth-re-rest100-re-steemitblog-hf20-update-operations-stable-20181002t075342700z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["steem"]}
created2018-10-02 07:53:45
last_update2018-10-02 07:53:45
depth6
children1
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-10-09 07:53:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length579
author_reputation119,002,354,889,508
root_title"HF20 Update: Operations Stable"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@nonameslefttouse ·
I could counter that, break things down and offer more solutions; since I can't build them, I guess it's all talk, no action.

You have yourself a good day, @smooth.
properties (22)
post_id63,507,644
authornonameslefttouse
permlinkre-smooth-re-nonameslefttouse-re-smooth-re-nonameslefttouse-re-smooth-re-rest100-re-steemitblog-hf20-update-operations-stable-20181002t080431068z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["steem"],"users":["smooth"]}
created2018-10-02 08:04:33
last_update2018-10-02 08:04:33
depth7
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-10-09 08:04:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length165
author_reputation304,321,988,710,771
root_title"HF20 Update: Operations Stable"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000