I did. Only to be told I was not focusing on ideas and principles, but people. My reply to @novacadian is about the fact that ISO is private property. I did not say there were no gray areas in regard to private property issues. It is not hard to understand. Thanks for your input.

Are you going to put efforts into improving the Wikipedia page? I agree with your perspective, I'm simply saying not everyone does and as evidence I give the encyclopedia.

Self ownership is a form or private property, yes. There are many forms of private property, many nuances to it (such as land rights and land disputes) which are not at all clear. Some people have views on those aspects of private property which you or I may not agree with, but they still hold to the NAP, self-ownership, and a "philosophy which holds that all forms of human association should be voluntary." I've met these people. I don't agree with them on everything, but I won't tell them what labels they are allowed to use based on nuanced private property disagreements. That was the point was trying to make, not that self-ownership isn't part of voluntaryism.

Ad long as each individual in the society voluntarily agrees to this system, sure.

I'm a business owner, and I plan to add more businesses to my list of assets.  Am I inherently evil for owning them?  I also plan to buy properties with houses or cabins on them to rent to people.  Does that make me evil?  According to some people here, I'm not "allowed" to have such things.  Having them makes me a tyrant in their opinion apparently.