<img src="https://www.steemimg.com/images/2016/08/19/hipwee-how-to-do-a-flat-lay-2-750x42217ae2d.jpg" alt="hipwee-how-to-do-a-flat-lay-2-750x42217ae2d.jpg" border="0">


The emergence of the container to write on the Internet has become its own independence for writers (both amateur and professional). With the container as Steemit, or the official website has received the contributors, of course it helps writers to express their thoughts, as well allowing their thoughts read by a wider audience.

The extent of the circulation of writing, is directly proportional to the extent of the various responses by the readers. Often encountered the writings that seem provocative. For example, from the title; The President is a puppet Pinocchio Geppetto, Alien Earth Because Destructive Human No Longer believe god. It could also be from the fact that refineries are mixed with opinions that do not correspond to the portions. Example; the fact that fish swim in the water but there is also a fish that can fly, then came the opinions fish now fly for society of a nation like this and like that (taken based on facts but not related to the initial premise), then entered again math, chemical formula, quotes scriptures, and so with the aim of strengthening the argument writers to influence readers. Boom!


 
Readers need to know that sometimes (perhaps now a frequent), I did it because many other factors;
(1). The author experienced the scene in person so I ask for the support of readers.
(2). Environmental writers like that, the author felt pity or hatred that affects the reader feel the same way.
(3). The author was asked by the agency or even tolannya to write like that.
(4). The author deliberately twist facts, making the image to influence the reader that will be sampled in of process data for subsequent writings.
(5). Requests the reader itself.
(6). And much the author's purpose, coupled with the fact that impressed close to the segmentation, the readers will be more interested in the author's discussion.

Will arise the question, "why did the author trap?" Wait a minute! Some writers do as well as it could be entertainment, tablets. Readers are selectively realize how 'funny' writings were eccentric. The reason could be because, the reader is very smart if they have to understand the intent of the article (the title, the sentence beginning and end of the text) aligned.

Actually, the writers realized ethics writing, both internet media what the print media. Each author also has the idealism of each, as well as readers who would have the idealism of his life, had the option of writing what you want to read or not. Funnily enough, the authors present (especially the author's website) gave the title or the opening sentence that impressed pro at A but guided for the reader to be a pro to B, without the reader noticing. Or put it this way, the author uses the phrase sarcasm and satire so that readers who do not pay attention very well be provoked into sympathy or antipathy precisely. Because often times, the reader will share (share) writings closely with life. Here, the author (article) serves as a medium of communication between the reader with the domain of the reader. Readers certainly choose topics according to the needs / her eyes, and how the fate of writers who have different viewpoints and wanted his thoughts conveyed? Yes, some writers might do the examples span the 'hierarchy in this paragraph.

<img src="https://www.steemimg.com/images/2016/08/19/635964208125618363-1839861109_td6b7d8e8.jpg" alt="635964208125618363-1839861109_td6b7d8e8.jpg" border="0">

But how should the reader to consume that information? Easy, simple, and fun. The trick;
(1). Read anything that looks interesting to the reader.
(2). Read from the early-mid-to late (if necessary repeated).
(3). Always open-minded.
(4). Locate, read the article that discusses aligned from various sources (another source).
(5). Conscious (uphold) with idealism readers.

Be perceptive reader, not just sentiment. Readers sentiment that allows the conflict to the parties concerned. If necessary, the authors monitored by the way;
(1). If the article does not correspond to the fact that natural readers, please ignore.
(2). If the writing was little or partially involves the reader's experience, please clarification.
(3). If the writing was very similar to what was experienced readers, please appreciation.

Because, basically, human (author) is a social creature who is always growing, learning to be a better person. Apparently, no man is a race / proud to be bad, it's just that every human being has a background that influences the actions he did. Good or bad is just a concept agree or disagree. For example; number 4 is the number of poor in Asia, whereas in Italy bad numbers are 17 different again with the West which considers bad numbers are 666. As we invented the date that became a good number for me.