RE: It's Time to Decentralize by remlaps

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @dhimmel/re-argsolver-q7eyy5

· @remlaps ·
$0.27
I have long thought that implementing something inspired by a [2nd price auction](http://www.gametheory.net/dictionary/auctions/secondpriceauction.html) for rewards in conjunction with a superlinear rewards curve (to discourage stake-splitting) would go a long way towards solving the valuation problem.

Unlike today's system where a voter can maximize curation rewards by voting at maximum strength, an algorithm inspired by a 2nd price auction could drive high-powered voters to self-limit their own voting strength to accurately match the perceived value that they place on a post.  Otherwise, they'd wind up wasting their voting power.

Among other places, I wrote about that in [Simulating a Steem curation rewards distribution that is modeled after a 2nd price auction](/@remlaps/simulating-a-steem-curation-rewards-distribution-that-is-modeled-after-a-2nd-price-auction)
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id85,298,206
authorremlaps
permlinkre-dhimmel-q7f536
categoryhive
json_metadata{"tags":["hive"],"app":"steempeak\/2020.03.6"}
created2020-03-19 02:18:42
last_update2020-03-19 02:18:42
depth3
children0
net_rshares1,569,578,646,402
last_payout2020-03-26 02:18:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.136 SBD
curator_payout_value0.135 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length878
author_reputation284,737,353,688,347
root_title"It's Time to Decentralize"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)