*The debt based banking system (lets say 1913 for arguments sake) will always end up where we are now. 1% -99%.
It's a mathematical certainty.*

Mistake. But that's a complex subject, perhaps another argument we may take up later

*Usury (not compound interest), is a healthy market mechanism to work out the value of money and goods*

**Now you are actually getting to the core.**

Goods (and services) have value. Money in fact has no value. Neither does gold, other than when it is made into shiny jewelry, or electronic components. 
Money is an abstract concept. Its value only holds as long as the bargaining parties continue to have faith that it will be redeemed for something of real value. 
When I go to the bank and get a $10,000 loan, your  bank account doesn't suddenly go down by $10,000.
Nor does anybody elses, not even the bank's. 
Instead they create that amount with a few keyboard strokes. Money created out of thin air. 
And more importantly, debt created out of thin air. 
The capitalist banker will not have to actually work to validate that sum,but the profit  will accrue in his offshore account nevertheless. 
It is the I worker, the victim of that fiat creation, who will have to work it off, by painting cars or digging ditches or shooting Syrians or baking bread or whatever. 
The only real connection is that the banker will eat the bread that I bake, even though he has contributed zero towards it. For which he will pay me with a fiction once again.
Paycheck slavery, defined.

Since you know about Jekyll island, you know more than most.
Root around some more in that vicinity (not that particular event, but the related creating/affecting tangents and principals).

@wordsword, ideally in a socialist system the producers of the 'something', the workers, voluntarily pooled the "something" (the true wealth), and you are distributing it, not 'taking' it. As stated by @lucylin, “we all work together for the common good.”

The difference is that in socialism you distribute the wealth equally to all whereas in capitalism you distribute it equally in your own pocket - with enough crumbs to the workers (trickle down) to keep them working. In practice too often even that doesn't happen which is why we have strikes and riots and starvation. After all, the basis of capitalism is maximizing profit.

In both systems it is the “you”, the allocator (controller) of the wealth which is the power point, and therefore the point that attracts actus reus; the point where the 'ideal' is corrupted. 

Ultimately the only salient point is, as lucylin said, “is altruism real... or not?”

lucylin argues 'not'.

He's wrong. If he were right, the world would be universally controlled by Thrasymachus (might makes right).

In reality, thankfully, that is not yet universal.