The debate was ok but I was disappointed with this debate. **Roger lost** but I would of liked it to be more pro. At this point they are so invested in there respected fav coins that their emotions run high. **Tony made good points and did win the debate** but the tone if you can hear became more like an argument.  I think most of us can agree-that Roger is trying to seek attention. And we make fun of him for it?**But are we doing anything to prevent that?** The more we respond to him the more relevance he has.  When will we just learn to ignore him? Then again we know CSW is not Satoshi and almost of all of us just want to ignore him but what you know-he "relevant" again-FU Calvin/Coingeek. I just want the freaking drama to end. BCH is not Bitcoin-it an altcoin that pretty ok ignoring some of the people. BTC is bitcoin and it wants offchain scaling-just let it happen. It can work-just let the coins experiment. **The "which coin is better" will never stop-free market makes sure of it-but atleast end the scaling war feud. It over. Each side is not helping to end. Roger doesn't like BTC-fine don't list. Call Btc-bitcoin and BCH a better bitcoin-Bitcoin 2.0 or whatever. I love BTC and will never use BCH but I done with this dumb type of shit. I doubt one side will ever back down. I however feel the BCH side is doing more of the physical wounds that are not letting the wound scar.
#selfupvote to put this comment above...