Ideally we might all begin/start at any family-of-origin-home with actual first words, however even in a best-case-scenario distant future with far better computers, there will be a theoretically standardizable Personally Hard Problem of Consciousness of words fading from memory, and memories not put into words on record well enough. 

(Sidenote: Do we need a PsyoSphere (Biosphere? Psybiosphere? Scipsyship? Err, PsyShip? A spaceship by another name, to track every word? To test if Realityl works if asked and recorded, and should everyone be at a Mac or a PC first, will it depend on if your mom or your dad or another person said a word first, whether or not you are given a Linux, PC, or iMac? Does the parent(s) get an eject button on the space Psychology ship, or do they have to listen up and write down that as part of the scientific NASA experiment studying the gravity of a Really~~/Extremely/Intelligent/Psychosociopathiclogically~~ Deep Home, too?)

Should your mom and dad and other people be on their own space ship during marital issues, will there be a dividing line wall, is it instant or gradually lowered, and does the Eject Button in the kid room lower a secure barrier around them immediately, just in case of the other people on the spaceship, what about if the parent(s) is smiling at the same time and is follwing Quora.com's "Be Nice Policy" to a T, and the child still pressed the Eject Button?

Should the spaceship's secure barrier activate 911 and does the parent get a passcode override, for the `Parent-Child('Eject Barrier', {parent , child, other})` psychology programming psych()logy routine function? Is the Eject Button on the ADT console (next to the 911 button) at adult and/or kid height?

I do not usually blog paragraphs but I always was chatting and writing, I do not think Psychology has gone that far, actually remembering what you spell by single alphanumeric letter a record per each line, if I am on a question & answer site like Quora.com and people are guessing, because they're not able to scross my public posts in full and do not have the technical literacy to describe that's not called "reading" me, and you can tell how long each indvidual had "reading" me before pressing a fancy button.

I am being judged for my writing by people who are heavily editing what they're writing before posting their first version. If I say input, I am counting from the first input of information, and we can argue if we start with physics or neurons or just value the part about how I am inputting early and inputting realer data, about how I think, about how I type, addressing issues which are not clearly resolved by any scientific community just by talking about Technology if not Psychology alone in terms of a record as proof of self and identification of speaking as a function not accomplished by grammatical proofreading.

I think a feeling generally would be that if we want to count people who are willing to talk about any issue at length on permanent record non stop, and start to value that predicament as a partial reality in general, depending how much we value recording as memory.

So in my mind *(~privileged? "Privileged intellectual function", said the Ph.D. psychologist's assessment I saved in my original Gmail account still provable. I added the approximation_sign myself, I think their evaluation should have been more pages and would have had an about_sign if written deeper but there were geopolitical systemic constraints. Geopolitical was their word, along with P.I.F. I am coining that PIF myself that does not have any meaning and is now a selfconlang jargon you can choose to evaluate deeper if that is your intent and motive we can ask why I only capitalized the first letter too. Wait, the email in Gmail says "privileged defense mechanism" I think the paper version said what I remember but can only prove the "PDM" part. I swear "intellectual" was said by them and others as well, how can I prove that part now, what if you only believe PDM and not PIF I want to full score that is not enough for Realityl record-keeping purposes, almost as terrible as not having my Realityl.info receipt from Pre-K where I cried my parent(s) name and was not taken seriously, I will find the Realityl receipt for the Pre-K part just wait.)* mind, well my thought_process, I'm starting with not making money as the issue, while somehow the first log entry about money being my comment placed here is about making some for a first, for a change, longer-term becoming clearer to predict my source of income, which has been steadier with donating blood plasma for a year before the IRS stimulus checks gave me another booster stage and now with just several thousand dollars I can prove I never made so much money before, and I survived because the internet is free and cheaper than a car, but somehow donating blood was my first regular salary and Jury Duty my first government job, yet I made alot (I could stretch $100 I did not pay rent yet just had parents) per site a few times before I graduated early from a Washington, D.C. high school ("prestigious" in "The Village" and became "popular" with "adults" who were "appropriate" given their "authority" who did not need to "ask" me about that whole time I wrote like that straight-edge sober never leaving far everyday same exact linguistic/behavioral patterns every day in school) with a "3.69 GPA" at age 15 (exactly 15 years old, notice the part where I graduated early at 15 years old?), so should I start with that?

I do not like beginning logging just at some random point (I already know Oath.com is willing to bank their thesis on me timestamping the "37" Danish Film Board reference about 37 people who did not know much and were terrible witnesses who became immortalized on contact, like me, who whereas now for me has eventfully given to Oath.com Officers who say love to highly-frequently say "Hello" to me by giving me a "37" mark in every minute hexcode/hashcode event), but what mark is good to start at linearly? I graduated early at 15 how? Okay so now adding me here, all my first posts have me as first comment so I do not need to worry as much about being accosted by the order shown if questions are fancy it just shows me first now, which might make better sense if you were me and not just judging "grammar style".

Did I mention I was 15, sober, straight-edge, and wrote the same exact way? Did you get the part where I was graduated early at age 15 somehow, who wants to be the first to ask a mature question on record about that, oh is that me now, me again asking the question first on public record for the first time anyone figured how to say that in any English words on permanent public record, period?

So while I often remark about not being financially independant, I may be financially literate, and that discrepancy is complicated to simplify evenly. I am iGabe.com fully, so I could have invested in Apple iMac but that part was not my world (and I did not like accentuating money making with my religious background that's too superstite and stereotypos I avoid going that deep I got enough attention at age 15, I do not need that attention, I got that attention around the issue of me being able to graduated there at age 15, I'm repeating that now so I do not need to watch other people guess for facts, I encourage you to notice the "age 15" and "15 years old" part if you need to start with facts), even though I had a regular MacWorld magazine through family really, stock was never my interest, but cryptocurrency/blockchain is leveling and brought me into thinking about my actual $alphanumerical value and worth.

As I was saying, where was I explaining talking like that, my chat is all just me, and articulates how I often remark(ed) about family and money and my age in a frequency that is apparently conscious, if you mean to ask. I did not really get asked questions in any adult way til I began to ask myself in writing (well, that makes it a provable start point)     .

So here'a a draft, sorry I keep thinking about the draft is for the chat but then worry about the timing and giving significance and meaning and not any context or input (like before being shh.Quora.com'ed, because I said and was repeating the word `Psychology` and `Psychologists` with the word `Family` and `Parent` too many times to count that part too?), of my mature thinking ~how exactly did I, I graduated early at 15, people/adults were calling me "mature" and "mature for my age" constantly, me talking exactly the same as now like that, sober straight-edge blood-tested never used golden and graduated with Latin and English with that number grade?~~ from a chat I wrote, all by myself, all the lines are my own, my words alone, I could have just written and not mentioned it was my chat first, but I want to show how I think in text (the setting is I did some WebAdverts (1998, one-page Perl script, I changed a variable and it still worked somehow) / AdWords (2002, I wrote "Professional" and hit a good nerve apparently I was good at keywords, Go) n' web design and oddjobs paid commission only rarely full salary and am not a breadwinner and survived with family/hush money before relying on shelters/friendships between homes as an adult and as a kid too, I had multiple computers and web hosts and stll have not crossed the poverty line if I understand correctly is what I've been told that makes me original too, and waited to invest in cryptocurrency due to not being a priority):

From 2021.6.21 (yesterday, so as not to influence the price of CVC too much, if that becomes an issue):

> Priorities. Civic and Bitcoin are equally crashing (good volatility), so I have roughly 5% incremental hedges for each level.
>
> I really just wanted to write on Quora, what if BTC was used for a nuclear bomb attack, then I'd have even less chance of getting back on Quora.
>Sun 10:23am

> I had the time to read https://finance.yahoo.com/news/jpmorgan-analysts-ethereum-trading-1-094403762.html / https://markets.businessinsider.com/currencies/news/ether-price-outlook-much-lower-network-activity-ethereum-jpmorgan-2021-5-1030408388 and balance that with analyzing the other hyperbolic news suggestions, did my own Sentiment Analysis. 
> 
> Am I learning to read better in terms of money? I just never cared to read about money before. 
> 
> Either that or G-d told me to sell at $4k, I can use either story.
> 
> Oh and "Bukele had been tinkering with the cryptocurrency even before winning office in 2019. The millennial politician and members of his Nuevas Ideas political party have owned Bitcoin for years, according to two people in the government who didn’t want to be quoted commenting on the president’s finances. B" https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2021-06-17/world-s-biggest-bitcoin-experiment-is-a-surf-town-in-el-salvador?sref=BWbpWjRm ...so that's now Snowden and El Salvador's president who apparently were not as paranoid about Bitcoin being crushed, and bankrolled their operations by not worrying as much as me.
> 
> I thought I would make my money by writing Quora questons.
> 8h

> If JP Morgan knows Ethereum is only worth $1000, and the rest is pumping, then I'm learning to read about money. But I really thought Quora was money, so how good is my reading?
>
> Does JP Morgan call the CEO of Coinbase and secretly ask how much is Leverage?
> 8h

> I say because it just crossed $2k, which was a "resistance" level.
> 
> And it can not possibly go higher before an 18 hex.... is my theory.
> 8h

> So, 8/1 it might cross above again.
> 
> Okay, if I say it to out loud, I can say it on Twitter, maybe.
> 8h

> And writing today that on the 6/21 is a good superstitious timing (dainty 1 2 3, and a terrible six) - to be making an 18 mark and talking about crossing the price line which is based (superstitiously en masse) on other, lets call it, um, symbolism.
> 
> That and JP Morga calling the Coinbase CEO secretly and saying the actual Leverage leads to a $1k price target.
> 
> And I being serious enough qualifying the superstitions along with the math?
> 8h

> I need to frame it in the context of me not understanding why it went up in 2017 and did not wait til 2018 and went down in the 18 how did that happen, my superstitious math did not function.
> 
> Maybe reading about JP Morgan helped.
> 8h

In case you wonder if I really talk like that, I do talk at that speed talking and also I am quite quiet and shy at the same time, I'm used to being told I look like I'm thinking because I'm not talking, because I wait/waited to type with a keyboard if I want to talk, but I do get told "You look like you're thinking." alot, in real-life since forever really, in which case I smile back silently and do not care to repeat that I can talk too, generally in response to questions I definitely talk, but will be quiet if there are not any questions.

Interestingly, Quora (https://www.quora.com/Prosody-Vereable-Context) did not ask me any questions (I am not counting random people messaging me their opinion in not a totally official capacity, which I did not respond to, thinking that could not really be their only official communicaton, that there would have to be a legitimate process, instead of the secret admin-only chat rooms behind what looked like a publicly administered community, assigning people to mock me by private message, I kept waiting for a comment that said anything official, while being corrected with single-letter changes) before severely judging me for how I talk. I had a bunch of people suddenly all at once message me about how I reminded them of someone and then Quora punched from behind.

Before I wrote my most serious paragraphs here/Google+/Facebook, I wrote my most serious paragraphs and questions at Quora.

So my chat shows the issue comes to mind like a serious relationship only it is a site called Quora, where I was writing about how good their audit trail system is, and then ("ironically") found after being punched by Quora that Quora was not following any standardized procedure and was not wearing a bodycam.

Which reminds me how Oath.com Officers (where is a single badge number?), and U.S. undercovers (should be required to do their work on CCTV at least) do not wear bodycams, like Quora (which had a log but does not show the part where I got punched by the superadmins while Oath.com said nothing).

Did I mention my priorities writing while being punched at the same time, and how they're not using badge numbers while punching people for policy?

By beginning Rublic-Record-Style reposting my own chats, with just my own words here (I used to post IRC with other's names, but that's just okay for Matrix.org and Internet Relay Chat), again only writing I wrote myself, so I can invite people to relate to my writing and speaking style otherwise, on record for a change. Maybe one day Quora will have to answer for how I was not asked any questions, while being verbally taunted by supers about a "Be Nice" policy and my "style" in coordinated attacks that lacked any due process, which were chats/emails made through Quora and definitely recorded.

Which as I was saying about where to start the storyline/timeline, the overlap between Quora and Real Life is a special relationship to describe, because it's also about judging how I speak and the words I said, while not being asked any modicum of due diligence questions or for my input.