<blockquote>Love becomes complete only when the two do it.” </blockquote>
<p>These words have been around since I was young when I didn&#x27;t know love. And since then, despite the years that have passed, these words still stand. But more important than this is that no one has a disagreement with this idea. Then, does the perfection of love really start with the two? <br/></p>
<p>Regardless of the reality and the media, love always starts with the two. Of course. Whether women or men, they always need something to love. Therefore, no matter what the shape of love is, the contact between the two is inevitable. </p>
<p>But there are facts that people sometimes forget. That is, that the beginning of love is always&#x27;from alone&#x27;. Human love doesn&#x27;t come out suddenly from the first moment of encountering the light of the world. </p>
<p>In this way, someone might rebel against my argument, taking&#x27;Romeo and Juliet&#x27;, which can be said to be the only couple who have never experienced love alone. But they too are coincidences anyway. </p>
<p>If there wasn&#x27;t one in the space where the two first met, or even if both were in one place, if they couldn&#x27;t find each other because of their narrow vision. They too may have gone through the process of&#x27;alone love&#x27;, that endurance.</p>
<p><img src="https://t1.daumcdn.net/thumb/R1280x0.fjpg/?fname=http://t1.daumcdn.net/brunch/service/user/bqd/image/10A93Rprfdc4QV-COyx1UCYLjYA"/>Romeo and Juliet (1996) still cut. Maybe the two&#x27;s fateful love was just an instant. Source = Naver Movie</p>
<p>The love of two. The sum is truly beautiful, but if you look at it, the fruit of that beauty is also because there was a process of loving someone desperately. Of course, our lives cannot turn back time like in the movie <strong>About Time,</strong> so the end of desperate love may not end with beauty. Even so, can&#x27;t you think that loving someone is just as beautiful?</p>
<blockquote>Love anyway. It must have already been completed... .” <br/></blockquote>

<p>The notion that love alone is foolish and foolish may be the fault of those who have standardized the perfection of love in the form of their own. It is a tremendous contradiction to judge and condemn someone for such a mistake. That&#x27;s inevitably contradictory because no one knows how big the love is. </p>
<p>I also meet <strong>&lt;a fool in unrequited love&gt;</strong> among the people I know . The reason they call me a fool is because they point to me as a fool, and every time I say this. </p>
<blockquote>I support your foolishness.” <br/><br/><br/></blockquote>
<p>There are many people in the world. They all look different, have different thoughts, and even have different habits. How do you try to define the form of love in the same way as if everything else says you should respect individuality?<br/></p>

<p>I hope you love it to your heart&#x27;s content. Even if the weight of that love is light like dust, even if the object changes tomorrow. I hope I love you so deeply that there is no regret today. </p>

<p>And one more thing, I hope you don&#x27;t forget that love starts from alone.</p>
</html>