RE: HF20 Update: Operations Stable by smooth

Viewing a response to: @rest100/re-steemitblog-hf20-update-operations-stable-20181001t214043653z

steem · @smooth · Oct 1 '18 (edited)

$0.25

Those are issues not of resource use but of voting consensus. If people don't like those contributions being rewarded they need to downvote them (and/or upvote other things)

👍 pfunk, whatsup, bitcoinparadise, pjau, lextenebris, artisticscreech

`post_id`	63,485,022
`author`	smooth
`permlink`	re-rest100-re-steemitblog-hf20-update-operations-stable-20181001t215441900z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2018-10-01 21:54:45
`last_update`	2018-10-01 21:55:15
`depth`	2
`children`	11
`net_rshares`	143,515,905,374
`last_payout`	2018-10-08 21:54:45
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.209 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.042 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	173
`author_reputation`	119,002,354,889,508
`root_title`	"HF20 Update: Operations Stable"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (6)

voter	rshares	pct
pfunk	47,752,194,899	1%
bitcoinparadise	26,852,823,006	100%
whatsup	40,086,941,957	11%
pjau	15,036,391,777	100%
lextenebris	8,052,995,872	33%
artisticscreech	5,734,557,863	100%

@kabir88 · Oct 1 '18

$2.24

What if you downvote those things and end up with a -12 reputation?

👍 jaki01, cardboard, dramaking

`post_id`	63,488,189
`author`	kabir88
`permlink`	re-smooth-re-rest100-re-steemitblog-hf20-update-operations-stable-20181001t232111950z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2018-10-01 23:21:12
`last_update`	2018-10-01 23:21:12
`depth`	3
`children`	1
`net_rshares`	1,156,139,510,876
`last_payout`	2018-10-08 23:21:12
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	1.680 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.555 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	67
`author_reputation`	9,428,539,925,480
`root_title`	"HF20 Update: Operations Stable"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (3)

voter	rshares	pct
jaki01	538,487,315,535	25%
cardboard	1,485,368,404	100%
dramaking	1,273,985,146	100%

@cardboard · Oct 2 '18 (edited)

You can always use bots to get the rep back. Or fellow users :)

👍 experiment

`post_id`	63,490,390
`author`	cardboard
`permlink`	re-kabir88-re-smooth-re-rest100-re-steemitblog-hf20-update-operations-stable-20181002t002340753z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2018-10-02 00:23:39
`last_update`	2018-10-02 00:23:57
`depth`	4
`children`	0
`net_rshares`	629,739,917
`last_payout`	2018-10-09 00:23:39
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	63
`author_reputation`	11,779,072,940,600
`root_title`	"HF20 Update: Operations Stable"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
experiment	0 B		629,739,917	1%

@nonameslefttouse · Oct 2 '18 (edited)

$0.16

Even the most popular accounts on Youtube would find it nearly impossible to trend twice in one day.  Some of them are multimillionaire recording artists known all over the planet.  

I've suggested this before: Steemit should be limiting trending slots to ONE per account.  That same publisher can still consistently trend, but only their most popular post at the time should appear on the trending list.  Everyone can still work towards maintaining their spot, trying to one up themselves with each publication, but a limit to one per account would open up far more slots for everyone else to have a chance at.  This doesn't hurt anyone.  Having more of a variety on that page would encourage more eyes to focus on it.

👍 jaki01, whatsup, insaneworks, feuerbolt

`post_id`	63,500,204
`author`	nonameslefttouse
`permlink`	re-smooth-re-rest100-re-steemitblog-hf20-update-operations-stable-20181002t045007055z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2018-10-02 04:50:09
`last_update`	2018-10-02 04:50:39
`depth`	3
`children`	8
`net_rshares`	84,167,096,320
`last_payout`	2018-10-09 04:50:09
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.121 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.039 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	720
`author_reputation`	304,321,988,710,771
`root_title`	"HF20 Update: Operations Stable"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (4)

voter	rshares	pct
whatsup	15,231,108,021	4%
jaki01	64,272,413,778	3%
feuerbolt	141,093,015	100%
insaneworks	4,522,481,506	100%

@whatsup · Oct 2 '18

Good idea!

properties (22)

`post_id`	63,501,951
`author`	whatsup
`permlink`	re-nonameslefttouse-re-smooth-re-rest100-re-steemitblog-hf20-update-operations-stable-20181002t053935059z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2018-10-02 05:39:39
`last_update`	2018-10-02 05:39:39
`depth`	4
`children`	0
`net_rshares`	0
`last_payout`	2018-10-09 05:39:39
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	10
`author_reputation`	404,265,487,362,343
`root_title`	"HF20 Update: Operations Stable"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000

@smooth · Oct 2 '18

$0.09

The aggressive manipulators, including the one being highlighted here, would certainly use multiple accounts to fill up the trending page that way.  You would get the illusion of diversity, but no real substance.

In truth, I don't see anything all that bad about limiting trending slots to one per account, because as you say (and I agree) it should almost never happen organically. However, I have little to no belief it would make a substantive difference.

👍 nonameslefttouse

`post_id`	63,505,148
`author`	smooth
`permlink`	re-nonameslefttouse-re-smooth-re-rest100-re-steemitblog-hf20-update-operations-stable-20181002t065944300z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2018-10-02 06:59:45
`last_update`	2018-10-02 06:59:45
`depth`	4
`children`	3
`net_rshares`	48,198,315,338
`last_payout`	2018-10-09 06:59:45
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.068 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.023 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	459
`author_reputation`	119,002,354,889,508
`root_title`	"HF20 Update: Operations Stable"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
nonameslefttouse	0 B		48,198,315,338	6%

@nonameslefttouse · Oct 2 '18

Creating the illusion of popularity is easy to see through.  

The creation of a new section:  *Peoples Choice*

When accounts voting match a certain criteria, the post moves up the ladder.  Minority accounts like those with the highest SP can vote, but their vote wouldn't count towards positioning, only rewards.  Small accounts virtually inactive aside from upvoting wouldn't count towards positioning.  Paid for votes wouldn't count towards positioning.  Only proven curators showing human behavior could contribute to positioning.  

Remember the 'active' tab?  That would be a nice feature to have back as well.  I don't think I'm the only one here who can have over 100 legitimate comments under posts and still go virtually unnoticed.

properties (22)

`post_id`	63,507,039
`author`	nonameslefttouse
`permlink`	re-smooth-re-nonameslefttouse-re-smooth-re-rest100-re-steemitblog-hf20-update-operations-stable-20181002t074930446z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2018-10-02 07:49:33
`last_update`	2018-10-02 07:49:33
`depth`	5
`children`	2
`net_rshares`	0
`last_payout`	2018-10-09 07:49:33
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	742
`author_reputation`	304,321,988,710,771
`root_title`	"HF20 Update: Operations Stable"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000

2 replies

@joeyarnoldvn · Oct 3 '18

Let me add, per account per tag, on trending. I'd like to see the top posts from different tags. Sometimes, the top ten posts may be using the #Steemit tag for example or something else. It might be better to see different tags, under the all trending page and like you said, one account per trending post in the specific trending pages. Beyond that, I'd love to see trending comments as well. Maybe even trending links, photos, videos, avatars, quotes, replies, memes, GIFs, etc, as well.

properties (22)

`post_id`	63,566,577
`author`	joeyarnoldvn
`permlink`	re-nonameslefttouse-re-smooth-re-rest100-re-steemitblog-hf20-update-operations-stable-20181003t075422181z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["steem","steemit"]}
`created`	2018-10-03 07:54:21
`last_update`	2018-10-03 07:54:21
`depth`	4
`children`	2
`net_rshares`	0
`last_payout`	2018-10-10 07:54:21
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	489
`author_reputation`	11,335,598,222,775
`root_title`	"HF20 Update: Operations Stable"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	0

@nonameslefttouse · Oct 3 '18

You can already view trending posts like that.  Simply select the trending tab, then select a tag on the left.  You can also click the tags at the bottom of any post and that will lead you to the trending posts of that tag.  You can do this with the Hot and New sections as well.

properties (22)

`post_id`	63,566,725
`author`	nonameslefttouse
`permlink`	re-joeyarnoldvn-re-nonameslefttouse-re-smooth-re-rest100-re-steemitblog-hf20-update-operations-stable-20181003t075854401z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2018-10-03 07:58:57
`last_update`	2018-10-03 07:58:57
`depth`	5
`children`	1
`net_rshares`	0
`last_payout`	2018-10-10 07:58:57
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	279
`author_reputation`	304,321,988,710,771
`root_title`	"HF20 Update: Operations Stable"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000

1 reply