RE: Current Steemit Problems and Solutions by stellabelle

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @arama/current-steemit-problems-and-solutions

· @stellabelle ·
I think you are onto something. The reward payout structure is based on Zipf's law. Once people realize that they're basically worthless in a scenario of 80% of the people being the "short-tail", then they leave. This really is the CENTRAL problem that Steemit users continue to leave. That and the fighting over content wars. I think the content wars would evaporate if the whale's absurd amount of power over what trends would be abolished. It really is a centralization of power that needs to be addressed. If your ideas are refined, and worked out, I think good creators would be attracted to Steem. Zipf's law is the wrong model to follow when dealing with human emotions.
๐Ÿ‘  ,
properties (23)
post_id1,763,133
authorstellabelle
permlinkre-arama-current-steemit-problems-and-solutions-20170115t191050901z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-01-15 19:10:51
last_update2017-01-15 19:10:51
depth1
children7
net_rshares2,129,342,569
last_payout2017-02-15 16:19:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length677
author_reputation436,515,832,240,166
root_title"Current Steemit Problems and Solutions"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@noisy ·
we will not convince people by giving them money. Our authors have to convince their readers, that this is good place to be.
๐Ÿ‘  ,
properties (23)
post_id1,763,630
authornoisy
permlinkre-stellabelle-re-arama-current-steemit-problems-and-solutions-20170115t201529113z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-01-15 20:15:27
last_update2017-01-15 20:15:27
depth2
children2
net_rshares13,083,975,081
last_payout2017-02-15 16:19:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length124
author_reputation54,116,952,654,646
root_title"Current Steemit Problems and Solutions"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@stellabelle ·
agreed.
๐Ÿ‘  
properties (23)
post_id1,769,639
authorstellabelle
permlinkre-noisy-re-stellabelle-re-arama-current-steemit-problems-and-solutions-20170116t174034083z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-01-16 17:40:33
last_update2017-01-16 17:40:33
depth3
children1
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-02-15 16:19:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length7
author_reputation436,515,832,240,166
root_title"Current Steemit Problems and Solutions"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@ackza ·
Hey whats up! nice seein u round here! Just got a surprise upvote from @arama and wanted to come check through their old posts and Thank this Arama Entity :D I love you steem whales youre all so inspiring! These cryptocurrency rewards are always so inspiring!
properties (22)
post_id45,322,651
authorackza
permlinkre-stellabelle-re-noisy-re-stellabelle-re-arama-current-steemit-problems-and-solutions-20180425t102506915z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["arama"], "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2018-04-25 10:25:09
last_update2018-04-25 10:25:09
depth4
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2018-05-02 10:25:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length259
author_reputation194,984,459,975,804
root_title"Current Steemit Problems and Solutions"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@barrydutton ·
If you have a minute, please look at my comments here in the thread Stella.   I have had the same  days on here, same issues, bumming me out a lot of the time, how odd is it like I said about @klye here earning less on a post than me, -- 95% of my days here like I was saying, I earn about 50ยข or $1 a day and I work super hard on a lot of my content.
properties (22)
post_id1,764,943
authorbarrydutton
permlinkre-stellabelle-re-arama-current-steemit-problems-and-solutions-20170115t235048114z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["klye"], "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-01-15 23:50:48
last_update2017-01-15 23:50:48
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-02-15 16:19:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length351
author_reputation333,682,425,228,294
root_title"Current Steemit Problems and Solutions"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@professorx ·
Thanks for the Zipf's reference. I totally get the content wars, and even "content du jour". Stuff like TIL come and go. But they don't stick in any meaningful way.  We may need to restructure how rewards are allocated. I think reputation is very important, so why not factor that into the reward?
properties (22)
post_id1,766,271
authorprofessorx
permlinkre-stellabelle-re-arama-current-steemit-problems-and-solutions-20170116t053612927z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-01-16 05:36:06
last_update2017-01-16 05:36:06
depth2
children2
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-02-15 16:19:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length297
author_reputation2,326,305,067,153
root_title"Current Steemit Problems and Solutions"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@stellabelle ·
if we think about it, true virality means more people like a particular post. If we factored in reputation as a determining factor for reward distibution, instead of SP power holders, this could make a difference. Having SP doesn't mean you're a good curator or someone who knows about social trends. The problem of sybil attacks could be solved by having reputation as a determining factor for rewards.
๐Ÿ‘  
properties (23)
post_id1,769,650
authorstellabelle
permlinkre-professorx-re-stellabelle-re-arama-current-steemit-problems-and-solutions-20170116t174300239z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-01-16 17:43:00
last_update2017-01-16 17:43:00
depth3
children1
net_rshares7,752,035,869
last_payout2017-02-15 16:19:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length403
author_reputation436,515,832,240,166
root_title"Current Steemit Problems and Solutions"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@professorx · (edited)
Exactly! Since it's based on vests right now, I wonder if reputation could be a factor of some sort. I assume its based on a 100 scale (maybe I am wrong). But that would be a good place to start.
properties (22)
post_id1,772,372
authorprofessorx
permlinkre-stellabelle-re-professorx-re-stellabelle-re-arama-current-steemit-problems-and-solutions-20170117t003054931z
categorysteemit
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}"
created2017-01-17 00:30:45
last_update2017-01-17 00:32:12
depth4
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-02-15 16:19:21
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length195
author_reputation2,326,305,067,153
root_title"Current Steemit Problems and Solutions"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000