Viewing a response to: @sigmajin/til-the-best-strategy-for-reducing-rewards-disparity-in-defense-of-the-flag-part-i
This is a very good analysis and I would imagine this took you quite some time to create. Do you think creating a seperate symbol for reducing rewards, not the flag would be a good idea?
post_id | 1,650,854 |
---|---|
author | stellabelle |
permlink | re-sigmajin-til-the-best-strategy-for-reducing-rewards-disparity-in-defense-of-the-flag-part-i-20161230t164305112z |
category | til |
json_metadata | "{"tags": ["til"]}" |
created | 2016-12-30 16:43:03 |
last_update | 2016-12-30 16:43:03 |
depth | 1 |
children | 11 |
net_rshares | 146,211,672,453 |
last_payout | 2017-01-30 16:38:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 186 |
author_reputation | 436,515,832,240,166 |
root_title | "TIL the best strategy for reducing rewards disparity (in defense of the flag, part I)" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
sigmajin | 0 | 89,466,709,816 | 100% | ||
beanz | 0 | 49,371,876,619 | 100% | ||
tommycordero | 0 | 7,373,086,018 | 100% |
thats actually what im going into in part 2. The change from a down chevron to a flag was a terrible idea, IMO. The motivation behind it was to discourage people from using it like a right swipe. but it backfired. Theres two problems. One is that its bad to tell people how they should vote under any circumstances. If trump is running against clinton, and i alter the ballot to discourage people from voting for trump, I have done an injury to the proccess. Even if my discouragement is reasonable. For example, the whole fake news thing became a thing because some people thought that people voted for trump because they saw bad things about clinton that weren't true (and spread by russians i guess) But imagine we had found out about this a week earlier. Even if we could know with 100% certainty that russians really had spread dirty lies about Clinton, it would still be harmful to the democratic procces to post a warning on the ballot like "you may have heard this and that about Hillary clinton on the internet. Please disregard it when making your decisions." Also, just the way the flag is displayed, causes unnecessary butt-hurtedness.
post_id | 1,650,943 |
---|---|
author | sigmajin |
permlink | re-stellabelle-re-sigmajin-til-the-best-strategy-for-reducing-rewards-disparity-in-defense-of-the-flag-part-i-20161230t165511450z |
category | til |
json_metadata | "{"tags": ["til"]}" |
created | 2016-12-30 16:55:09 |
last_update | 2016-12-30 17:46:42 |
depth | 2 |
children | 10 |
net_rshares | 2,605,689,016,824 |
last_payout | 2017-01-30 16:38:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.091 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.029 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 1,160 |
author_reputation | 35,846,309,024,528 |
root_title | "TIL the best strategy for reducing rewards disparity (in defense of the flag, part I)" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
tinfoilfedora | 0 | 54,828,493,315 | 100% | ||
stellabelle | 0 | 1,748,956,722,707 | 100% | ||
sigmajin | 0 | 79,127,201,578 | 100% | ||
demotruk | 0 | 647,655,611,910 | 100% | ||
beanz | 0 | 49,371,876,619 | 100% | ||
tommycordero | 0 | 7,219,480,059 | 100% | ||
windmaster | 0 | 1,999,840,630 | 100% | ||
irah | 0 | 3,800,580,266 | 100% | ||
marojan | 0 | 4,341,170,500 | 100% | ||
yaman | 0 | 2,730,325,996 | 100% | ||
dreemit | 0 | 5,657,713,244 | 50% |
I think there should be a "reduce rewards" button that does not affect reputation score. The flag is connected to reputation damage, and I think that's bad when just trying to even out reward payouts.
post_id | 1,650,959 |
---|---|
author | stellabelle |
permlink | re-sigmajin-re-stellabelle-re-sigmajin-til-the-best-strategy-for-reducing-rewards-disparity-in-defense-of-the-flag-part-i-20161230t165837431z |
category | til |
json_metadata | "{"tags": ["til"]}" |
created | 2016-12-30 16:58:36 |
last_update | 2016-12-30 16:58:36 |
depth | 3 |
children | 4 |
net_rshares | 89,466,709,816 |
last_payout | 2017-01-30 16:38:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 200 |
author_reputation | 436,515,832,240,166 |
root_title | "TIL the best strategy for reducing rewards disparity (in defense of the flag, part I)" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
sigmajin | 0 | 89,466,709,816 | 100% |
The flag technically doesn't reduce your rep unless your post goes below $0.00 and becomes censored. The same way your post rewards don't belong to you until after the payout, any increase in your reputation is not yours until after the payout. So the downvotes only decrease your *pending* increase in reputation.
post_id | 1,651,186 |
---|---|
author | beanz |
permlink | re-stellabelle-re-sigmajin-re-stellabelle-re-sigmajin-til-the-best-strategy-for-reducing-rewards-disparity-in-defense-of-the-flag-part-i-20161230t174431882z |
category | til |
json_metadata | "{"tags": ["til"]}" |
created | 2016-12-30 17:44:39 |
last_update | 2016-12-30 17:44:39 |
depth | 4 |
children | 3 |
net_rshares | 89,467,294,420 |
last_payout | 2017-01-30 16:38:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 316 |
author_reputation | 68,303,733,730,210 |
root_title | "TIL the best strategy for reducing rewards disparity (in defense of the flag, part I)" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
sigmajin | 0 | 89,467,294,420 | 100% |
post_id | 1,650,994 |
---|---|
author | beanz |
permlink | re-sigmajin-re-stellabelle-re-sigmajin-til-the-best-strategy-for-reducing-rewards-disparity-in-defense-of-the-flag-part-i-20161230t170408064z |
category | til |
json_metadata | "{"tags": ["til"]}" |
created | 2016-12-30 17:04:18 |
last_update | 2016-12-30 17:04:18 |
depth | 3 |
children | 3 |
net_rshares | 141,502,773,370 |
last_payout | 2017-01-30 16:38:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 71 |
author_reputation | 68,303,733,730,210 |
root_title | "TIL the best strategy for reducing rewards disparity (in defense of the flag, part I)" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
sigmajin | 0 | 87,677,375,620 | 100% | ||
beanz | 0 | 48,167,684,506 | 100% | ||
dreemit | 0 | 5,657,713,244 | 50% |
i will upvote it for you....
post_id | 1,651,226 |
---|---|
author | stellabelle |
permlink | re-beanz-re-sigmajin-re-stellabelle-re-sigmajin-til-the-best-strategy-for-reducing-rewards-disparity-in-defense-of-the-flag-part-i-20161230t175438789z |
category | til |
json_metadata | "{"tags": ["til"]}" |
created | 2016-12-30 17:54:39 |
last_update | 2016-12-30 17:54:39 |
depth | 4 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 138,377,229,314 |
last_payout | 2017-01-30 16:38:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 28 |
author_reputation | 436,515,832,240,166 |
root_title | "TIL the best strategy for reducing rewards disparity (in defense of the flag, part I)" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
sigmajin | 0 | 84,099,256,755 | 100% | ||
beanz | 0 | 48,167,717,912 | 100% | ||
barrydutton | 0 | 452,541,403 | 1% | ||
dreemit | 0 | 5,657,713,244 | 50% |
I know, right?? I came across him in a post by @generation.easy and told him he needed to start posting again or re-posting his old stuff :)
post_id | 1,652,970 |
---|---|
author | dreemit |
permlink | re-beanz-re-sigmajin-re-stellabelle-re-sigmajin-til-the-best-strategy-for-reducing-rewards-disparity-in-defense-of-the-flag-part-i-20161230t234205859z |
category | til |
json_metadata | "{"users": ["generation.easy"], "tags": ["til"]}" |
created | 2016-12-30 23:42:06 |
last_update | 2016-12-30 23:46:15 |
depth | 4 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 89,467,294,420 |
last_payout | 2017-01-30 16:38:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 140 |
author_reputation | 165,111,672,942,758 |
root_title | "TIL the best strategy for reducing rewards disparity (in defense of the flag, part I)" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
sigmajin | 0 | 89,467,294,420 | 100% |
> The change from a down chevron to a flag was a terrible idea, IMO. Could not agree more.
post_id | 1,652,258 |
---|---|
author | smooth |
permlink | re-sigmajin-re-stellabelle-re-sigmajin-til-the-best-strategy-for-reducing-rewards-disparity-in-defense-of-the-flag-part-i-20161230t210731300z |
category | til |
json_metadata | "{"tags": ["til"]}" |
created | 2016-12-30 21:07:30 |
last_update | 2016-12-30 21:07:30 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 89,467,294,420 |
last_payout | 2017-01-30 16:38:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 91 |
author_reputation | 119,002,354,889,508 |
root_title | "TIL the best strategy for reducing rewards disparity (in defense of the flag, part I)" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
sigmajin | 0 | 89,467,294,420 | 100% |