RE: Self-voting of @berniesanders (35.14%) vs @haejin (93.09%) by studgriffin

Viewing a response to: @berniesanders/self-voting-of-berniesanders-35-14-vs-haejin-93-09

steem · @studgriffin · Feb 24 '18

is this factoring in all of your accounts? I doubt it

👍 starjuno
👎 randowhale, thecyclist, yougotflagged, ngc, thebotkiller, iflagtrash, danknugs, theyeti, thesloth, berniesanders, speakyourmind, the.bot, randomthoughts, rewardpoolrape, nextgencrypto, ozchartart, engagement

`post_id`	34,878,588
`author`	studgriffin
`permlink`	re-berniesanders-self-voting-of-berniesanders-35-14-vs-haejin-93-09-20180224t111049442z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}"
`created`	2018-02-24 11:10:45
`last_update`	2018-02-24 11:10:45
`depth`	1
`children`	4
`net_rshares`	-397,038,715,725
`last_payout`	2018-03-03 11:10:45
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	53
`author_reputation`	378,248,990,638
`root_title`	"Self-voting of @berniesanders (35.14%) vs @haejin (93.09%)"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (18)

voter	rshares	pct
berniesanders	-11,229,202,568	-10%
nextgencrypto	-4,589,997,720	-10%
danknugs	-40,879,749,776	-10%
the.bot	-8,401,635,765	-10%
ozchartart	-2,147,169,190	-10%
thebotkiller	-54,257,957,608	-10%
thecyclist	-396,421,013,607	-10%
engagement	-1,093,288,954	-10%
iflagtrash	-48,332,622,441	-10%
theyeti	-28,017,977,185	-10%
yougotflagged	-145,795,605,990	-10%
randomthoughts	-8,339,137,158	-10%
randowhale	-439,720,344,406	-2%
thesloth	-14,369,910,904	-10%
ngc	-57,235,984,768	-10%
starjuno	880,246,982,128	100%
speakyourmind	-9,836,035,338	-10%
rewardpoolrape	-6,618,064,475	-10%

@berniesanders · Feb 24 '18 (edited)

$0.57

Yes it is since they all follow this one.  Ignorant fool.  Go back to jerking off the goat fucker.

👍 berniesanders, lyndsaybowes, devi1714, suppaoutlaw

`post_id`	34,891,888
`author`	berniesanders
`permlink`	re-studgriffin-re-berniesanders-self-voting-of-berniesanders-35-14-vs-haejin-93-09-20180224t124005022z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}"
`created`	2018-02-24 12:40:03
`last_update`	2018-02-24 12:40:33
`depth`	2
`children`	3
`net_rshares`	105,183,991,046
`last_payout`	2018-03-03 12:40:03
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.566 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	98
`author_reputation`	604,103,165,045,172
`root_title`	"Self-voting of @berniesanders (35.14%) vs @haejin (93.09%)"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (4)

voter	rshares	pct
berniesanders	99,332,282,200	100%
lyndsaybowes	3,752,457,049	20%
devi1714	1,495,246,948	20%
suppaoutlaw	604,004,849	100%

@studgriffin · Feb 24 '18

$4.24

Your self vote percentage for bernie is 37%. Your self vote percentage for all other accounts is 0%. 
Your alternate accounts are not factored in the @berniesanders percentage.

And regardless, abusively upvoting ones self isn't as bad as abusively flagging dozens of innocent people. 

I only wish you would try to learn how to be nicer to people, to change the way you think. I am very sorry that you turned out the way you are.. you might be a lot happier if you search for some self improvement!

👍 starjuno, studgriffin, zapncrap
👎 thecyclist, ngc, iflagtrash, thebotkiller, danknugs, theyeti, thesloth, berniesanders, speakyourmind, the.bot, randomthoughts, rewardpoolrape, nextgencrypto, ozchartart, engagement

`post_id`	34,931,953
`author`	studgriffin
`permlink`	re-berniesanders-re-studgriffin-re-berniesanders-self-voting-of-berniesanders-35-14-vs-haejin-93-09-20180224t163124643z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["berniesanders"], "tags": ["steem"]}"
`created`	2018-02-24 16:31:27
`last_update`	2018-02-24 16:31:27
`depth`	3
`children`	2
`net_rshares`	783,796,556,972
`last_payout`	2018-03-03 16:31:27
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	3.184 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	1.057 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	499
`author_reputation`	378,248,990,638
`root_title`	"Self-voting of @berniesanders (35.14%) vs @haejin (93.09%)"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (18)

voter	rshares	pct
berniesanders	-1,604,005,864	-1%
nextgencrypto	-606,043,826	-1%
danknugs	-5,450,208,259	-1%
the.bot	-1,120,182,954	-1%
ozchartart	-286,251,623	-1%
thebotkiller	-6,383,287,495	-1%
thecyclist	-52,854,043,029	-1%
engagement	-145,764,912	-1%
iflagtrash	-6,904,310,093	-1%
theyeti	-3,735,576,212	-1%
randomthoughts	-1,111,633,196	-1%
thesloth	-1,915,926,816	-1%
ngc	-7,978,353,874	-1%
starjuno	868,021,329,598	100%
zapncrap	247,480,745	1%
speakyourmind	-1,157,180,628	-1%
studgriffin	7,442,309,801	100%
rewardpoolrape	-661,794,391	-1%

@moeknows · Feb 24 '18

True, but if you were to make that comparison, you would also have to include Rancho's votes in there as well.

properties (22)

`post_id`	34,932,945
`author`	moeknows
`permlink`	re-studgriffin-re-berniesanders-re-studgriffin-re-berniesanders-self-voting-of-berniesanders-35-14-vs-haejin-93-09-20180224t163709928z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	"{"app": "busy/2.3.0", "community": "busy", "tags": ["steem"]}"
`created`	2018-02-24 16:37:12
`last_update`	2018-02-24 16:37:12
`depth`	4
`children`	1
`net_rshares`	0
`last_payout`	2018-03-03 16:37:12
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	110
`author_reputation`	9,722,496,103,749
`root_title`	"Self-voting of @berniesanders (35.14%) vs @haejin (93.09%)"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000

1 reply