<html> <p><strong>Lately I've found myself more and more in trouble not knowing exactly how to cover the span between my interests as a blogger and my responsibility as a curator. </strong></p> <p>I'm not talking about time management, I'm rather trying to find a fair way of distributing my voting power. Steemit's community is growing fast, a lot new users are joining the platform, and everybody should get some attention.</p> <p><strong>However, voting power is limited and so is the distribution of rewards.</strong></p> <h3>Is there still a golden middle course?</h3> <p><img src="http://assets2.ignimgs.com/2016/06/16/supermanthumbjpg-c104d3_1280w.jpg" width="1280" height="720"/></p> <h1>Trying To Find The Right Way</h1> <p><strong>On steemit you can be a curator who doesn't blog but you can't be a blogger that doesn't curate.</strong></p> <p>Being part of a social network means: give and take. However, if you've reached a certain number of followers from a mathematical point of view it's impossible to appreciate every vote you receive with an outgoing one. </p> <p>But then how to fairly allocate the few voting power we have?</p> <h2>The moment you decide to support one person you automatically decide to NOT support another.</h2> <p><img src="https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/13/fd/cb/13fdcbfc370eebe94c22b22b5ec9f440.jpg" width="736" height="552"/></p> <h1>Where To Spend Our Attention?</h1> <h2>Is it more important to pay for comments or curate new content?</h2> <p><strong>An average number of comments I currently receive for a blog posts ranges from about 20 to 40.</strong></p> <p>One of my core principles as member of this amazing network is that every person who takes the time to comment on my content deserves a certain recognition.</p> <h3><strong>I believe that a personal comment is the most valuable type of social interaction we do have in this eco-system.</strong></h3> <p>Now, If I decided to appreciate all of the received comments giving them a 100% upvote each, my voting power would run out quickly. </p> <p>Good.</p> <p>But then if I reduced the share, how much would be appropriate? How much is a comment worth?</p> <h3><strong>That's the way I've done it lately: full voting power paid for comments. </strong></h3> <p>But then you receive messages from people who send you links to their blogs asking for your support. You bookmark the article and so you do with 100 others... then you add 'more voting power' to your steemit wishlist.</p> <h2>It feels like being caught between the devil and the deep blue sea!</h2> <p><img src="https://scontent-mrs1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/18836074_1490721097677103_4492748888726979411_n.jpg?oh=0ce08a7dcfbdf45ac7f813f1b3be0d15&oe=59E81372" width="700" height="381"/></p> <h3>Probably being a 'fair' and responsible curator in that context doesn't mean that you distribute your power equally.</h3> <p>First of all it means that you care and try to support the people that you like and the content that meets the criteria you've previously defined. </p> <p>To me it also means supporting brandnew entries, introduction posts, new talents - trying to give them a good feeling right from the start. </p> <h3><strong>If you miss some then this is a logical consequence of the fact that ressources are not infinite.</strong></h3> <p>I don't use any bots, so the chance that I miss somebody or something is even higher. However, bots wouldn't make anys sense to me since I decided to use a major port of my daily power to pay for comments - not only in my own blog but also in others.</p> <h2>My conclusion: Ressources are limited and there will always be much more talented authors and valuable content than voting power. We can only try to find an appropriate way to somehow recognize all of them and their creativity.</h2> <h3>Attention is a highly desired good, and the fact that it's limited makes it even more valuable.</h3> <p><br></p> <p><strong>Now I'd love to know how you manage to distribute your voting power 'fairly'?</strong></p> <p>Wishing you all a wonderful weekend, Steemians ❤️</p> <p>Marly - </p> <p><br></p> <p>Title picture: IGN.com; Quotes: pinterest.com and quotemaster.org.</p> </html>
post_id | 3,298,338 |
---|---|
author | surfermarly |
permlink | what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "format": "html", "image": ["http://assets2.ignimgs.com/2016/06/16/supermanthumbjpg-c104d3_1280w.jpg"], "tags": ["rewards", "blog", "steemit", "community", "fairness"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 13:08:06 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 13:08:06 |
depth | 0 |
children | 57 |
net_rshares | 19,278,003,392,570 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 13:08:06 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 312.930 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 61.920 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 4,234 |
author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
smooth | 0 | -1,597,035,888,340 | -10% | ||
wackou | 0 | 1,017,856,253,784 | 20% | ||
pharesim | 0 | 423,719,554,101 | 6% | ||
sandra | 0 | 22,723,167,177 | 70% | ||
abit | 0 | -2,003,533,625,835 | -10% | ||
ihashfury | 0 | 7,234,499,023 | 48.3% | ||
boy | 0 | 4,518,154,882 | 100% | ||
bue-witness | 0 | 5,509,126,870 | 100% | ||
bunny | 0 | 780,897,113 | 100% | ||
bue | 0 | 91,520,506,973 | 100% | ||
mini | 0 | 2,414,878,793 | 100% | ||
moon | 0 | 307,035,494 | 100% | ||
lovejoy | 0 | 55,424,266,955 | 100% | ||
jason | 0 | 23,653,688,167 | 48.3% | ||
vip | 0 | 159,643,509,170 | 100% | ||
healthcare | 0 | 899,951,822 | 100% | ||
tuck-fheman | 0 | 7,061,815,341 | 5% | ||
daniel.pan | 0 | 1,423,744,883 | 100% | ||
team | 0 | 189,241,010,207 | 100% | ||
helen.tan | 0 | 411,592,199 | 100% | ||
makishart | 0 | 16,279,504,367 | 85% | ||
hipster | 0 | 198,868,909,242 | 40% | ||
lola-carola | 0 | 664,385,007 | 17% | ||
acidyo | 0 | 1,810,798,919,299 | 40% | ||
verelst | 0 | 4,318,167,999 | 100% | ||
sqlinsix | 0 | 6,629,272,468 | 100% | ||
rok-sivante | 0 | 582,286,071,383 | 100% | ||
the-alien | 0 | 138,088,920,239 | 100% | ||
juanmiguelsalas | 0 | 11,427,642,801 | 100% | ||
samether | 0 | 2,717,738,354 | 40% | ||
trogdor | 0 | 20,520,796,925 | 10% | ||
christoryan | 0 | 675,298,484 | 4% | ||
grey580 | 0 | 11,138,848,713 | 100% | ||
roelandp | 0 | 551,697,415,204 | 100% | ||
riscadox | 0 | 7,776,448,353 | 90% | ||
robrigo | 0 | 132,784,044,573 | 100% | ||
redpalestino | 0 | 165,166,610,909 | 100% | ||
cryptochannel | 0 | 1,155,665,575 | 40% | ||
onthewayout | 0 | 4,953,755,836 | 100% | ||
knircky | 0 | 494,123,586,513 | 100% | ||
ausbitbank | 0 | 919,948,978,125 | 25% | ||
freeyourmind | 0 | 1,141,654,265,009 | 100% | ||
biophil | 0 | 32,921,543,067 | 100% | ||
juvyjabian | 0 | 832,832,321 | 10% | ||
krystle | 0 | 11,076,167,741 | 25% | ||
hastla | 0 | 16,584,423,077 | 100% | ||
kendewitt | 0 | 31,479,074,414 | 50% | ||
blueorgy | 0 | 56,504,009,074 | 100% | ||
oululahti | 0 | 5,949,552,988 | 100% | ||
heimindanger | 0 | 22,282,355,547 | 100% | ||
tarindel | 0 | 4,410,421,193 | 100% | ||
bola | 0 | 2,343,880,673 | 5% | ||
deanliu | 0 | 250,588,957,171 | 50% | ||
exyle | 0 | 381,543,588,635 | 50% | ||
moon32walker | 0 | 124,077,998,564 | 100% | ||
marius19 | 0 | 45,777,430,723 | 100% | ||
mlmtraffic | 0 | 129,432,615 | 100% | ||
lemooljiang | 0 | 31,498,457,931 | 50% | ||
michaeldodridge | 0 | 102,342,788,805 | 100% | ||
beanz | 0 | 22,200,510,176 | 100% | ||
jamesbrown | 0 | 134,359,621,687 | 50% | ||
spinner | 0 | 3,011,475,058 | 100% | ||
craigslist | 0 | 608,950,228 | 100% | ||
transhuman | 0 | 2,572,590,154 | 44% | ||
laoyao | 0 | 16,912,710,992 | 50% | ||
myfirst | 0 | 6,267,708,184 | 50% | ||
somebody | 0 | 170,665,869,146 | 50% | ||
toxic | 0 | 669,184,405,463 | 100% | ||
midnightoil | 0 | 25,573,765,860 | 50% | ||
snowflake | 0 | 1,173,465,276,816 | 100% | ||
surfermarly | 0 | 97,492,782,876 | 100% | ||
elfkitchen | 0 | 7,513,067,318 | 50% | ||
fishingvideos | 0 | 2,637,716,836 | 50% | ||
oflyhigh | 0 | 19,874,200,147 | 50% | ||
hanshotfirst | 0 | 292,774,385,754 | 40% | ||
bledarus | 0 | 564,967,214 | 100% | ||
rubenalexander | 0 | 5,938,957,260 | 16% | ||
philipnbrown | 0 | 1,648,282,487 | 100% | ||
chinadaily | 0 | 14,161,961,226 | 50% | ||
kyriacos | 0 | 62,798,400,997 | 58% | ||
helene | 0 | 21,779,310,164 | 50% | ||
lemouth | 0 | 73,958,384,254 | 100% | ||
telasius | 0 | 66,476,898 | 100% | ||
samstonehill | 0 | 17,726,139,260 | 40% | ||
ethansteem | 0 | 62,179,261,134 | 50% | ||
sethlinson | 0 | 2,215,125,994 | 8.5% | ||
hilarski | 0 | 98,848,707,460 | 50% | ||
nomadnessie | 0 | 5,743,934,172 | 100% | ||
creatr | 0 | 30,486,327,795 | 100% | ||
etcmike | 0 | 285,701,522,465 | 100% | ||
runridefly | 0 | 7,605,618,603 | 7% | ||
sharingeverybite | 0 | 32,454,923,873 | 100% | ||
jlufer | 0 | 10,433,310,119 | 100% | ||
shenanigator | 0 | 85,026,671,048 | 100% | ||
penguinpablo | 0 | 171,689,329,524 | 60% | ||
uwelang | 0 | 18,806,942,939 | 20% | ||
canadian-coconut | 0 | 1,475,660,693,253 | 36% | ||
ruscion | 0 | 86,856,328 | 100% | ||
doitvoluntarily | 0 | 64,255,703,985 | 100% | ||
kyusho | 0 | 26,001,150,077 | 50% | ||
profitgenerator | 0 | 32,445,308,202 | 100% | ||
lordoftruth | 0 | 174,650,007 | 100% | ||
maarnio | 0 | 9,887,017,055 | 100% | ||
the-ego-is-you | 0 | 4,090,118,978 | 100% | ||
ebargains | 0 | 6,844,214,819 | 40% | ||
anahilarski | 0 | 14,744,886,179 | 20% | ||
gringalicious | 0 | 124,349,896,257 | 50% | ||
heroic15397 | 0 | 10,880,499,675 | 100% | ||
rynow | 0 | 18,663,267,880 | 100% | ||
clayboyn | 0 | 10,586,485,355 | 100% | ||
puffin | 0 | 14,114,383,923 | 100% | ||
lucashunter | 0 | 848,953,895 | 100% | ||
aksinya | 0 | 14,761,585,420 | 100% | ||
lighteye | 0 | 2,655,159,444 | 50% | ||
dodders007 | 0 | 21,480,293,945 | 100% | ||
dylanhobalart | 0 | 17,286,082,616 | 100% | ||
siniceku | 0 | 1,095,570,250 | 100% | ||
bosjaya | 0 | 356,762,887 | 100% | ||
mithrilweed | 0 | 13,483,837,946 | 100% | ||
birds90 | 0 | 5,505,834,361 | 50% | ||
projectnewbie | 0 | 5,807,892,000 | 40% | ||
dresden | 0 | 30,869,455,091 | 85% | ||
beginningtoend | 0 | 46,077,996,151 | 100% | ||
freiheit50 | 0 | 30,146,894,329 | 100% | ||
bigbear | 0 | 127,635,247 | 100% | ||
tupacisback | 0 | 726,144,851 | 100% | ||
lalala | 0 | 1,507,806,168 | 50% | ||
thejohalfiles | 0 | 4,008,035,870,344 | 30% | ||
ebryans | 0 | 39,825,439,278 | 100% | ||
judasp | 0 | 23,915,938,351 | 100% | ||
juniper | 0 | 725,758,629 | 100% | ||
zorg67 | 0 | 55,027,148 | 100% | ||
cavemanrob | 0 | 6,840,122,154 | 100% | ||
properremake | 0 | 725,789,220 | 100% | ||
encountercounter | 0 | 725,945,823 | 100% | ||
timeparadox | 0 | 725,915,320 | 100% | ||
fireworks | 0 | 725,717,170 | 100% | ||
angel76 | 0 | 11,271,073,158 | 100% | ||
discipline | 0 | 725,696,084 | 100% | ||
coonhunter | 0 | 725,675,881 | 100% | ||
poiplu | 0 | 725,696,747 | 100% | ||
cloudstrife | 0 | 726,038,855 | 100% | ||
steemonme | 0 | 725,622,066 | 100% | ||
leaderofleaders | 0 | 725,611,981 | 100% | ||
barneyrubble | 0 | 725,601,557 | 100% | ||
etotheipi | 0 | 725,530,028 | 100% | ||
centeredsoul | 0 | 725,476,935 | 100% | ||
rightrythm | 0 | 725,489,667 | 100% | ||
ted1984 | 0 | 725,457,867 | 100% | ||
smokinhot | 0 | 725,424,875 | 100% | ||
whatageek | 0 | 88,693,101,205 | 100% | ||
chadmoore | 0 | 725,478,952 | 100% | ||
batonrouge | 0 | 1,202,429,344 | 100% | ||
onlygooddeals | 0 | 725,446,299 | 100% | ||
enrichened | 0 | 725,353,125 | 100% | ||
barretwallace | 0 | 1,202,440,842 | 100% | ||
dontbetrippin | 0 | 725,385,086 | 100% | ||
glenyven23 | 0 | 963,119,549 | 100% | ||
j3dy | 0 | 6,865,200,266 | 100% | ||
windows23 | 0 | 962,652,542 | 100% | ||
steemquotient | 0 | 724,884,847 | 100% | ||
alphalion | 0 | 1,201,953,223 | 100% | ||
nigelmarkdias | 0 | 11,527,756,028 | 100% | ||
moonlanding | 0 | 963,013,640 | 100% | ||
loudnoises | 0 | 962,621,258 | 100% | ||
breezin | 0 | 1,995,378,165 | 100% | ||
smoothcriminal | 0 | 962,600,633 | 100% | ||
eternalfreedom | 0 | 1,204,108,873 | 100% | ||
steemitalpha | 0 | 724,793,177 | 100% | ||
lockandkeys | 0 | 724,802,673 | 100% | ||
sweetonion | 0 | 1,201,930,083 | 100% | ||
copyandpaste | 0 | 724,750,049 | 100% | ||
juices | 0 | 724,782,396 | 100% | ||
countdracula | 0 | 724,729,035 | 100% | ||
pawntod4 | 0 | 962,537,156 | 100% | ||
undertale | 0 | 723,703,598 | 100% | ||
freemit | 0 | 962,796,847 | 100% | ||
maxedoutstats | 0 | 724,678,396 | 100% | ||
gutzofter | 0 | 76,749,785,855 | 100% | ||
medrivevan | 0 | 354,140,145 | 100% | ||
reisman | 0 | 2,335,265,459 | 40% | ||
steemquestions | 0 | 9,126,292,292 | 100% | ||
dreemit | 0 | 114,925,472,081 | 100% | ||
krasotka | 0 | 7,555,141,913 | 100% | ||
germanlifestyle | 0 | 25,907,332,246 | 50% | ||
tamersameeh | 0 | 114,890,095 | 40% | ||
lazariko12 | 0 | 821,867,166 | 100% | ||
someonewhoisme | 0 | 1,081,838,366,888 | 100% | ||
sebastianjago | 0 | 47,460,479,806 | 50% | ||
blackbunny | 0 | 2,336,059,028 | 50% | ||
lifelovelifting | 0 | 1,301,763,223 | 100% | ||
davidcurwain | 0 | 309,281,576 | 100% | ||
fisteganos | 0 | 1,798,368,097 | 8% | ||
sumsum | 0 | 9,419,025,613 | 100% | ||
paolobeneforti | 0 | 20,142,068,462 | 100% | ||
wattacut | 0 | 746,349,092 | 100% | ||
deividas | 0 | 317,127,855 | 100% | ||
lingfei | 0 | 2,739,563,392 | 50% | ||
steemitgecko | 0 | 1,331,573,618 | 100% | ||
tarazkp | 0 | 2,696,895,746 | 25% | ||
eusebio | 0 | 417,161,348 | 100% | ||
aaronmda | 0 | 443,365,720 | 100% | ||
yyyy | 0 | 646,130,063 | 50% | ||
fleur | 0 | 3,148,887,835 | 100% | ||
sebhofmann | 0 | 19,791,721,163 | 100% | ||
evildeathcore | 0 | 810,650,855 | 40% | ||
speckofdust | 0 | 1,174,070,995 | 100% | ||
hebrew | 0 | 9,429,046,886 | 10% | ||
teammo | 0 | 36,912,664,161 | 100% | ||
anwarabdullah | 0 | 226,637,442 | 100% | ||
bookman | 0 | 4,022,559,269 | 100% | ||
inna-yatsuk | 0 | 1,839,727,987 | 100% | ||
htooms | 0 | 188,151,779,485 | 10% | ||
joanawatts | 0 | 2,183,258,735 | 100% | ||
btu | 0 | 243,924,302,947 | 100% | ||
trafalgar | 0 | 1,062,976,622,892 | 20% | ||
laodr | 0 | 1,107,850,626 | 50% | ||
eirik | 0 | 1,602,406,962 | 100% | ||
thomasgutierrez | 0 | 640,837,871 | 100% | ||
fiord18 | 0 | 1,196,744,238 | 100% | ||
andrianna | 0 | 365,467,230 | 100% | ||
elevator09 | 0 | 1,537,308,345 | 100% | ||
bcc | 0 | 261,663,292,760 | 100% | ||
awesomianist | 0 | 1,035,327,910 | 40% | ||
redhens | 0 | 6,431,969,005 | 100% | ||
uradick | 0 | 223,684,259,414 | 100% | ||
rencong | 0 | 1,140,473,334 | 100% | ||
skririm | 0 | 1,589,082,051 | 100% | ||
looftee | 0 | 3,689,825,936 | 20% | ||
koalafamily | 0 | 2,397,755,519 | 100% | ||
aismor | 0 | 653,749,191 | 100% | ||
lizanomadsoul | 0 | 6,909,592,871 | 100% | ||
the01crow | 0 | 1,245,244,818 | 100% | ||
anomadsoul | 0 | 3,655,047,251 | 100% | ||
markwhittam | 0 | 3,824,627,908 | 100% | ||
prameshtyagi | 0 | 27,007,014,789 | 100% | ||
franzmafka | 0 | 1,199,412,218 | 100% | ||
velimir | 0 | 2,865,349,087 | 100% | ||
looking4llamas | 0 | 1,193,082,713 | 100% | ||
cryptodog | 0 | 1,327,302,767 | 100% | ||
synapse | 0 | 1,098,770,896 | 100% | ||
contentguy | 0 | 855,224,730 | 100% | ||
rdickey | 0 | 215,323,878 | 100% | ||
htliao | 0 | 1,190,215,864 | 100% | ||
vandal | 0 | 17,174,591,765 | 100% | ||
wbulot | 0 | 13,489,645,144 | 100% | ||
captainmaku | 0 | 1,276,981,404 | 100% | ||
marcusxman | 0 | 732,355,678 | 5% | ||
heastbistdeppad | 0 | 2,517,405,614 | 100% | ||
sichadutrottel | 0 | 156,653,033 | 100% | ||
barbara-orenya | 0 | 1,497,178,730 | 100% | ||
bobskibob | 0 | 1,434,326,106 | 100% | ||
reisolutions | 0 | 2,392,927,731 | 100% | ||
jraysteem | 0 | 308,838,508 | 100% | ||
emilniz | 0 | 303,117,171 | 100% | ||
wthomas | 0 | 20,019,329,704 | 100% | ||
marcellus-wllace | 0 | 1,467,500,314 | 100% | ||
budimir | 0 | 225,820,469 | 100% | ||
angelgarz | 0 | 1,859,054,230 | 100% | ||
leomichael | 0 | 192,428,926 | 100% | ||
helena-m | 0 | 1,363,828,476 | 100% | ||
markcampbell | 0 | 212,151,007 | 100% | ||
clickinchicken | 0 | 1,515,364,163 | 100% | ||
gococonuts | 0 | 1,515,446,576 | 100% | ||
steempearls | 0 | 257,018,909 | 100% | ||
ercpok | 0 | 408,472,021 | 100% | ||
berlinmoonlight | 0 | 8,857,426,002 | 100% |
I don't have so much voting power atm. However, when I will have I will choose my best daily post and vote using my full power! I will vote with less power to other good posts of my following ;)
post_id | 3,298,598 |
---|---|
author | lazariko12 |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t131908793z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 13:19:06 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 13:19:06 |
depth | 1 |
children | 2 |
net_rshares | 78,950,227,834 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 13:19:06 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.202 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.064 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 194 |
author_reputation | 49,481,680,921,551 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
mlmtraffic | 0 | 126,275,722 | 100% | ||
surfermarly | 0 | 78,823,952,112 | 80% |
Good
post_id | 3,298,991 |
---|---|
author | mlmtraffic |
permlink | re-lazariko12-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t133421904z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 13:34:27 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 13:34:27 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 126,275,722 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 13:34:27 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 4 |
author_reputation | 829,638,483,337 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
mlmtraffic | 0 | 126,275,722 | 100% |
Good strategy @lazariko12! Best of luck for that journey 😊
post_id | 3,300,026 |
---|---|
author | surfermarly |
permlink | re-lazariko12-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t141001436z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["lazariko12"], "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 14:09:57 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 14:09:57 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 14:09:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 59 |
author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
I spend more time voting content and commenting than posting blog posts. Just my preference and my way of adding value. Plus, people like @furion or @timcliff add tons of value to SteemIt by consolidating great content for new people or making it easy to query data on this platform. The user @maarnio and @steemit-health add value to the platform by having fun games for people to participate. There's a ton of ways to add value to SteemIt outside of voting and posting. I like what you're doing and I think we should give ourselves credit in the sense that we may add value without intending to sometimes.
post_id | 3,298,605 |
---|---|
author | steemquestions |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t131918027z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["furion", "timcliff", "maarnio", "steemit-health"], "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 13:19:18 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 13:19:18 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 96,777,801,404 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 13:19:18 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.256 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.073 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 612 |
author_reputation | 838,172,356,364 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
lauralemons | 0 | 9,207,819,179 | 100% | ||
surfermarly | 0 | 78,823,952,112 | 80% | ||
steemquestions | 0 | 8,746,030,113 | 100% |
> There's a ton of ways to add value to SteemIt outside of voting and posting. That is absolutely true. Even when reading content (which is not "measurable" in that sense) we spend attention and provide value. Thanks for stopping by and mentioning some exemplary value creators 😊 Have a good weekend!
post_id | 3,299,969 |
---|---|
author | surfermarly |
permlink | re-steemquestions-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t140813917z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 14:08:09 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 14:08:09 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 8,936,161,202 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 14:08:09 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.029 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 303 |
author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
steemquestions | 0 | 8,936,161,202 | 100% |
I love the quote about the attention economy not growing. So true, other platforms will suffer when Steemit and other paid platforms gain momentum.
post_id | 3,298,651 |
---|---|
author | hilarski |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t132130387z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 13:21:30 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 13:21:30 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 97,492,782,876 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 13:21:30 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.248 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.082 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 147 |
author_reputation | 526,151,861,331,570 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
surfermarly | 0 | 97,492,782,876 | 100% |
Thank you, Randy. The cake doesn't have infinite pieces, and steemit will be definitely one of the winners in the long term. Fully agreed! Have a great weekend 😊
post_id | 3,300,067 |
---|---|
author | surfermarly |
permlink | re-hilarski-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t141112540z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 14:11:06 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 14:11:06 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 14:11:06 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 161 |
author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
Interesting post! I can't say I've thought about evenly distributing voting power but that's likely due to the fact that I have nowhere near as much influence as you. I guess as this platform grows, we're all going to have to take such things like this into account.
post_id | 3,298,692 |
---|---|
author | looking4llamas |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t132323429z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 13:23:24 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 13:23:24 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 87,121,210,230 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 13:23:24 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.224 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.073 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 266 |
author_reputation | 153,304,730,336 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
surfermarly | 0 | 87,121,210,230 | 90% |
Voting power - or better said: influence - doesn't neccessarily depend on the Steem Power behind. Yes, from a monetary point of view it does. However, a vote is a vote is an appreciation, a sign of interest, a recognition. On other platforms where we don't get paid for social interaction the simple vote (or "like") is the highest existing bid. Thanks for stopping by and sharing your time 😊
post_id | 3,300,183 |
---|---|
author | surfermarly |
permlink | re-looking4llamas-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t141508804z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 14:15:06 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 14:15:06 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 1,193,082,713 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 14:15:06 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 393 |
author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
looking4llamas | 0 | 1,193,082,713 | 100% |
nice words @surfermarly
post_id | 3,298,749 |
---|---|
author | speckofdust |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t132530795z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["surfermarly"], "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 13:25:33 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 13:25:33 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 13:25:33 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 23 |
author_reputation | 2,531,240,049,595 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
Thanks 😊
post_id | 3,300,196 |
---|---|
author | surfermarly |
permlink | re-speckofdust-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t141531466z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 14:15:27 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 14:15:27 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 14:15:27 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 8 |
author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
I don't have a lot of voting power, and I spend a lot of my time active on Steemit while at work, so making blog posts is usually out of the question during the day. I spend my daytime curating, and commenting, and then when I can, Ill post a blog sometimes in the evening. I do like you do, I actively peruse the new posts, not just the people I follow, looking for great *unique* content that grabs my attention. I think a welcoming environment is essential to growing this community. I also don't use bots, because I want my vote to be a representation of me, not representative of an autonomous AI in order to solely grow my SP. To answer your final question __"Now I'd love to know how you manage to distribute your voting power 'fairly'?__ My answer....there is no ___"fair"___ way to distribute your voting power. You said yourself when you vote for "A", sometimes you'll miss "B". I think we have to do what we can with what little time we are given, and whatever resources we have available to us. just my thoughts, hope that gives you some clarity on how others process this responsibility. Thanks
post_id | 3,298,804 |
---|---|
author | cavemanrob |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t132733038z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 13:27:33 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 13:27:33 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 95,418,468,347 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 13:27:33 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.244 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.080 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 1,122 |
author_reputation | 4,200,812,845,890 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
surfermarly | 0 | 95,418,468,347 | 100% |
> I also don't use bots, because I want my vote to be a representation of me, not representative of an autonomous AI in order to solely grow my SP. That's exactly how I think about it. It's more: I almost always leave a comment explaining why I upvoted a certain piece of content. It's my form of showing respect towards other authors. We all know how much effort is needed to be creative... > My answer....there is no "fair" way to distribute your voting power. You said yourself when you vote for "A", sometimes you'll miss "B". I think we have to do what we can with what little time we are given, and whatever resources we have available to us. Correct. Actually I was hoping to get answers like these...😉 There is no "perfect" distribution, just the intention to spend time and ressources wisely and according to our possibilities. Thanks a lot for sharing your thoughts with us! Very valuable!!
post_id | 3,300,350 |
---|---|
author | surfermarly |
permlink | re-cavemanrob-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t142115029z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 14:21:09 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 14:21:09 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 14:21:09 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 905 |
author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
Very interesting post @surfermarly
post_id | 3,298,860 |
---|---|
author | reenamathew |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t132930416z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["surfermarly"], "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 13:29:30 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 13:29:30 |
depth | 1 |
children | 2 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 13:29:30 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 34 |
author_reputation | 6,573,214,094,059 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
Thanks, I'm happy you enjoyed it 🙂
post_id | 3,300,732 |
---|---|
author | surfermarly |
permlink | re-reenamathew-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t143446762z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 14:34:42 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 14:34:42 |
depth | 2 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 14:34:42 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 34 |
author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
You are welcome .
post_id | 3,331,531 |
---|---|
author | reenamathew |
permlink | re-surfermarly-re-reenamathew-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170603t110742499z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-03 11:07:39 |
last_update | 2017-06-03 11:07:39 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-06-10 11:07:39 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 17 |
author_reputation | 6,573,214,094,059 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
Awesome post! I like it. I followed you please follow me 🔙 if possible.
post_id | 3,298,960 |
---|---|
author | mlmtraffic |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t133315371z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 13:33:21 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 13:33:21 |
depth | 1 |
children | 2 |
net_rshares | 47,838,666,788 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 13:33:21 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.122 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.036 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 73 |
author_reputation | 829,638,483,337 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
mlmtraffic | 0 | 129,432,615 | 100% | ||
surfermarly | 0 | 47,709,234,173 | 50% |
Thank you 😉 I'm following you, too.
post_id | 3,300,236 |
---|---|
author | surfermarly |
permlink | re-mlmtraffic-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t141659615z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 14:16:57 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 14:16:57 |
depth | 2 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 123,118,829 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 14:16:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 35 |
author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
mlmtraffic | 0 | 123,118,829 | 100% |
It's my pleasure!
post_id | 3,300,291 |
---|---|
author | mlmtraffic |
permlink | re-surfermarly-re-mlmtraffic-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t141838054z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 14:18:45 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 14:18:45 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 123,118,829 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 14:18:45 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 17 |
author_reputation | 829,638,483,337 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
mlmtraffic | 0 | 123,118,829 | 100% |
Thanks for this post Marly ! I wonder where you take the time....lol I upvote all the kind comments people take time to leave but : * I'm fairly new here and have not widely as many as you have and yet, it's a lot of time because I care the interaction and Thankyouing for a nice appreciation is the minimum of education and politeness, and I can't help but had one blue creature or anything joyful, so sometimes I even go create the right charactere for the answer ...Hell, I'm THAT crazy , but I enjoy doing it as long as I still can do it, that is to say as long as I have not yet twenty comments on my posts =D * I have no voting power, as far as I can see ;-) I think I used to have a tiny little but now I have none, so I wonder if I did something wrong with the upvotes... I wonder also **what is it you call a 100% upvote** Marly..? can you vote at a lower percentage ? if yes, what the hell does it mean and where can you settle that ? it's not the first time I read that in a post and now I feel to ask you because I didn't understand it *bymyself*...lol if there is an answer somewhere, I apologize...didn't find it Hey , here is a blue one for you to thank you in advance :![up&resteemedredim.png](https://steemitimages.com/DQmYi8L6Jw9Qy4kYY944Z3jD8a8kRQ4P4eN7ChmczHY9dGi/up%26resteemedredim.png)
post_id | 3,299,521 |
---|---|
author | barbara-orenya |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t135242166z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "image": ["https://steemitimages.com/DQmYi8L6Jw9Qy4kYY944Z3jD8a8kRQ4P4eN7ChmczHY9dGi/up%26resteemedredim.png"], "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 13:52:39 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 13:52:39 |
depth | 1 |
children | 7 |
net_rshares | 391,251,276,236 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 13:52:39 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 1.101 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.352 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 1,315 |
author_reputation | 163,430,584,272,314 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
hipster | 0 | 29,830,336,386 | 5% | ||
acidyo | 0 | 271,619,837,894 | 5% | ||
samether | 0 | 452,956,392 | 5% | ||
lauralemons | 0 | 409,237,651 | 5% | ||
cryptochannel | 0 | 173,349,836 | 5% | ||
surfermarly | 0 | 85,046,895,700 | 90% | ||
ebargains | 0 | 1,140,702,469 | 5% | ||
projectnewbie | 0 | 871,183,800 | 5% | ||
reisman | 0 | 333,609,351 | 5% | ||
tamersameeh | 0 | 57,445,047 | 5% | ||
tarazkp | 0 | 772,352,562 | 5% | ||
evildeathcore | 0 | 405,325,427 | 5% | ||
awesomianist | 0 | 138,043,721 | 5% |
> I wonder where you take the time....lol I bought some extra hours per day from God! Paid with steem actually.. 😆 You know I'm a huge fan of your avatars. This one is brilliant. Thank you so much!!! Regarding the voting power: When you click once on the blue button (upvote button) then a controller appears that enables you to increase or decrease the percentage of voting power for the corresponding post. If you chose 80% for instance and then clicked on the blue button again, then 80% of your currently available voting power would be transferred to the related account. That only makes sense if you have a relevant amount of Steem Power and want to distribute your daily power to more than 40 accounts (currently we have 40 votes with 100% power before the voting power starts to decrease). Here's a screenshot of the blue button and controller (I'm not sure if the bar is shown to all users or just the ones that have reached a certain amount of SP): https://scontent-mad1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p206x206/18920603_1490856194330260_8377225690921868249_n.jpg?oh=c1ce5d7a3979a375f1b738dfb2a78ea7&oe=59AC30BD Thanks for stopping by and leaving your thoughs. **Wish you a great weekend!**
post_id | 3,300,658 |
---|---|
author | surfermarly |
permlink | re-barbara-orenya-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t143211461z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "image": ["https://scontent-mad1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-0/p206x206/18920603_1490856194330260_8377225690921868249_n.jpg?oh=c1ce5d7a3979a375f1b738dfb2a78ea7&oe=59AC30BD"], "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 14:32:06 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 14:32:06 |
depth | 2 |
children | 6 |
net_rshares | 364,326,996,795 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 14:32:06 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 1.016 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.329 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 1,199 |
author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
lovejoy | 0 | 54,347,928,857 | 100% | ||
hipster | 0 | 29,830,336,386 | 5% | ||
acidyo | 0 | 271,619,837,894 | 5% | ||
samether | 0 | 452,956,392 | 5% | ||
lauralemons | 0 | 409,237,651 | 5% | ||
cryptochannel | 0 | 173,349,836 | 5% | ||
ebargains | 0 | 1,140,702,469 | 5% | ||
projectnewbie | 0 | 871,183,800 | 5% | ||
reisman | 0 | 333,609,351 | 5% | ||
tamersameeh | 0 | 57,445,047 | 5% | ||
tarazkp | 0 | 772,352,562 | 5% | ||
evildeathcore | 0 | 405,325,427 | 5% | ||
awesomianist | 0 | 138,043,721 | 5% | ||
acromott | 0 | 2,309,239,633 | 100% | ||
barbara-orenya | 0 | 1,465,447,769 | 100% |
Oh this is the most relevant answer to the question ! This is so nice of you to have taken the time, really ! for me this is precisely on these kind of things that we can recognize lovely nice people WITHOUT A DOUBT ;-) there are a lot here, it's very cool ... The law of attraction in motion ^_^ I almost fell out of my chair when you wrote about this blue bar because I have never seen it .. =D it does not appear in my computer so I suppose that indeed it is necessary to have a certain number of SP... ![Hyacintheseulcoloresansfond.png](https://steemitimages.com/DQmWM7kAb8e7S5wGdqfaYtU67xzBqL1yxrKM3Xn8c5jmeA9/Hyacintheseulcoloresansfond.png)So thanks a bunch for your answer, and for your appreciation also ;-) *You really rock* ^_^
post_id | 3,301,607 |
---|---|
author | barbara-orenya |
permlink | re-surfermarly-re-barbara-orenya-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t150119544z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "image": ["https://steemitimages.com/DQmWM7kAb8e7S5wGdqfaYtU67xzBqL1yxrKM3Xn8c5jmeA9/Hyacintheseulcoloresansfond.png"], "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 15:01:15 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 15:01:15 |
depth | 3 |
children | 2 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 15:01:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 746 |
author_reputation | 163,430,584,272,314 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
I haven't seen that bar yet. Must be a certain amount of SP...? I have heard that you counl vote at certain levels, I have also been curious about this.
post_id | 3,317,738 |
---|---|
author | acromott |
permlink | re-surfermarly-re-barbara-orenya-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170603t001848515z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-03 00:18:48 |
last_update | 2017-06-03 00:18:48 |
depth | 3 |
children | 2 |
net_rshares | 102,207,447,614 |
last_payout | 2017-06-10 00:18:48 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.268 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.087 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 152 |
author_reputation | 215,995,371,281,134 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
surfermarly | 0 | 102,207,447,614 | 100% |
You said: **To me it also means supporting brandnew entries, introduction posts, new talents - trying to give them a good feeling right from the start.** In my opinion this is the best way to go! For me steemit is awesome because I give and get real attention! I read a lot of content and I comment way more then I write posts. I just love commenting and reading here. Steemit is my new favourite magazine which I am also a part of. For me it´s most important to see that the pearson I taked to in the comments responded in some way. sometimes it´s an upvote and other times it´s a written response. No matter how much voting power is spend I always benefit on steemit by learning so much. By helping others to feel welcome here you give them so much. Maybe even more then your upvote could do. In my opinion **you are doing everything right.**
post_id | 3,299,581 |
---|---|
author | sumsum |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t135424398z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 13:54:36 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 13:56:00 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 85,046,895,700 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 13:54:36 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.220 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.071 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 844 |
author_reputation | 26,302,679,918,953 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
surfermarly | 0 | 85,046,895,700 | 90% |
Great point of view, @sumsum! I fully agree on every single part of your comment. I also do enjoy very much the amount of knowledge provided on steemit. Content has true value here, it's a completely different story compared to other networks. Again, thanks for sharing your valuable thoughts! Enjoy your Friday 🙂
post_id | 3,300,716 |
---|---|
author | surfermarly |
permlink | re-sumsum-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t143423041z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["sumsum"], "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 14:34:18 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 14:34:18 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 9,419,025,613 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 14:34:18 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.029 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 313 |
author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
sumsum | 0 | 9,419,025,613 | 100% |
i like to upvote comments and it has me at a lower voting power all the time lol
post_id | 3,299,615 |
---|---|
author | doitvoluntarily |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t135605923z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 13:56:06 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 13:56:06 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 85,046,895,700 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 13:56:06 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.220 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.071 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 80 |
author_reputation | 728,152,294,256,151 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
surfermarly | 0 | 85,046,895,700 | 90% |
Haha, well then we are facing the very same "problems" (if they are even problems) 🙂
post_id | 3,300,760 |
---|---|
author | surfermarly |
permlink | re-doitvoluntarily-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t143524908z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 14:35:21 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 14:35:21 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 47,120,849,589 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 14:35:21 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.159 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 84 |
author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
doitvoluntarily | 0 | 47,120,849,589 | 100% |
Is there enough value in voting to be worth spending much time thinking about it? Like, for me, my votes are a few cents. I can vote 40ish times a day at full power. It seems a lot easier to just upvote good stuff as I go than to think about it literally at all other than that.
post_id | 3,299,654 |
---|---|
author | heymattsokol |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t135737469z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 13:57:36 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 13:57:36 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 13:57:36 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 279 |
author_reputation | 75,470,595,669,689 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
> Is there enough value in voting to be worth spending much time thinking about it? Well the rewards pool of this platform is distributed thanks to these votes, so in my opinion there is a LOT of value in it 😉 My votes are a few cents, too. Currently like $0.15 per vote. That's a lot compared to the time when I started... So I want to spend them wisely. It's definitely "easier" to simply vote and not talk about it. But this is a social network where people care a lot about the rewards pool, so I thought it would be a nice move asking and sharing opinions about it. Have a good weekend!
post_id | 3,300,958 |
---|---|
author | surfermarly |
permlink | re-heymattsokol-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t144109607z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 14:41:09 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 14:41:09 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 14:41:09 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 594 |
author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
Very interesting! I had thought about how to distribute voting power fairly but since I don't have so much now I have concentrated on commenting. Just my preference.
post_id | 3,300,037 |
---|---|
author | team101 |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t141015803z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 14:10:21 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 14:10:21 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 76,641,500,084 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 14:10:21 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.201 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.062 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 167 |
author_reputation | 12,239,897,411,079 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
surfermarly | 0 | 74,675,323,054 | 80% | ||
team101 | 0 | 1,966,177,030 | 100% |
That's an excellent way of showing appreciation, probably the most valuable of all 😉 I'm happy you enjoyed this piece of content. Have a nice weekend!
post_id | 3,301,044 |
---|---|
author | surfermarly |
permlink | re-team101-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t144324466z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 14:43:18 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 14:43:18 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 14:43:18 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 150 |
author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
I try to post once per day, then give some attention to up voting. I am a creature of habit so I have certain bloggers I give more attention to. I am also a busy person and have a life away from steemit that I really love. I don't ever want to find myself sitting in front of my monitor reading and up voting all day and all night. So bottom line, I do what I can and try not to think too hard about it.
post_id | 3,300,173 |
---|---|
author | beginningtoend |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t141439814z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 14:14:39 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 14:14:39 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 93,344,153,817 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 14:14:39 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.242 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.078 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 403 |
author_reputation | 82,963,848,333,719 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
surfermarly | 0 | 93,344,153,817 | 100% |
> I am also a busy person and have a life away from steemit that I really love. I don't ever want to find myself sitting in front of my monitor reading and up voting all day and all night. So bottom line, I do what I can and try not to think too hard about it. Great statement! That's surely the way to go. Thank you! We shouldn't overthink it either. Fully agreed! I also have a life outside steemit what I appreciate much 😉 Have a great weekend!
post_id | 3,301,134 |
---|---|
author | surfermarly |
permlink | re-beginningtoend-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t144600178z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 14:45:54 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 14:45:54 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 14:45:54 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 449 |
author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
I start my day with curating from the "new posts". Usually I see the new guys there. If I see an article that is worthy I start commenting. Soon enough I find out that I can expand further and make a post about it: I also reward every single comment starting from 1%. Here is my philosophy about it <h2><a href="https://steemit.com/steemit/@kyriacos/commenting-pays-like-compound-interest">Commenting Pays Like Compound Interest</a></h2>
post_id | 3,302,045 |
---|---|
author | kyriacos |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t151617849z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "links": ["https://steemit.com/steemit/@kyriacos/commenting-pays-like-compound-interest"], "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 15:16:18 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 15:16:57 |
depth | 1 |
children | 2 |
net_rshares | 104,293,313,892 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 15:16:18 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.270 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.088 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 439 |
author_reputation | 150,969,386,046,457 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
surfermarly | 0 | 104,293,313,892 | 100% |
What a great approach and well written article. I'm very glad you shared it with me, I had to resteem it directly :) I would sign your arguments regarding comments right away. I started to comment all the articles I upvoted right from the beginning (which in my case was July 2016). First, my behavior followed my instinct, since I wanted to show some respect and appreciation to the authors and give them a solid explanation why I considered their piece of content worth being rewarded. Tim Minchin said once: "Be pro-stuff not anti-stuff. Stand up for the things you love." That is something that really touched me and became my new "guidance". Back to my steemit experience: When some time had passed and I began to knew the system better, I realized that I instinctively did well commenting since a lot of users appreciated my behavior and (indeed) started following me therefore. I'm totally sure that my way here would have been different if I hadn't done it like that. Again, thanks for your valuable thoughts! Have a pleasant weekend!
post_id | 3,328,425 |
---|---|
author | surfermarly |
permlink | re-kyriacos-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170603t084625097z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-03 08:46:18 |
last_update | 2017-06-03 08:46:48 |
depth | 2 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-06-10 08:46:18 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 1,044 |
author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
I think it is of vital importance to comment on people's work. I understand how much time and effort goes in each post and people should really feel the appreciation. It is a great moral boost. Thank you for your detailed comment. I really enjoy getting to know Steemians in this level. Makes one appreciate the community even more.
post_id | 3,328,832 |
---|---|
author | kyriacos |
permlink | re-surfermarly-re-kyriacos-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170603t090506236z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-03 09:05:06 |
last_update | 2017-06-03 09:05:06 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-06-10 09:05:06 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 334 |
author_reputation | 150,969,386,046,457 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
Excellent post, thanks for the read! >We can only try to find an appropriate way to somehow recognize all of them and their creativity. I think communities with curators more concentrated curators on them will do really good later on. We have to remember that the daily output of Steem is limited, but not SteemDollars, the more curators we have with more voting power, the wider they will be able to distribute the daily pool to reward efforts and creativity in most directions and topics. I myself ever since I started my curation trail have been trying to vote on as many posts as possible and follow as many authors as possible, no matter the topics they post about or kind of photos they like to upload. I also tend to shift from some newcomers to others once I feel they have started to receive a good and constant posting rewards from automated votes and are therefor "oldtimers" already. It feels great to be able to help out newcomers cause you still remember how it was for yourself in the beginning and how the lack of curators might have given no visibility to your posts and demotivated you from posting more often. While at the same time being able to see all these other authors getting consistent rewards it makes it even worse at times if you are striking out. At the same time though you have to read through a lot, either before you start trusting the author or have to try and make sure its not a plagiarist post. I like how well the system already works though considering how early on we are here still and with more people and active curators it will become much better. :)
post_id | 3,302,310 |
---|---|
author | acidyo |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t152544402z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 15:25:42 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 15:25:42 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 104,293,313,892 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 15:25:42 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.270 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.088 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 1,600 |
author_reputation | 1,572,775,251,470,663 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
surfermarly | 0 | 104,293,313,892 | 100% |
Thanks for taking the time to stop by and share your valuable thoughts with us, @acidyo! > It feels great to be able to help out newcomers cause you still remember how it was for yourself in the beginning and how the lack of curators might have given no visibility to your posts and demotivated you from posting more often. I couldn't agree more! My start was very tough. I wrote a lot of articles that didn't find any audience and even missed to do an introduction post (or at least I didn't tag it correctly), so my visibility was close to zero. It's a true pleasure now providing others a helping hand that seem to have the same issues, sharing knowledge and contributing to the network´s growth. Then you look back and your own trouble in the beginning gets tiny and unimportant...:) It's not the first time that I mention the following quote, but I think it perfectly fits in now. **Have a great weekend!** https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-qYL6CnFyqUY/V76jyTpC4MI/AAAAAAAAAKg/1rOFaFU4VV4mqDSPgth94QOUibemNnVawCLcB/s1600/Lifting-Others.jpg
post_id | 3,328,586 |
---|---|
author | surfermarly |
permlink | re-acidyo-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170603t085526528z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["acidyo"], "image": ["https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-qYL6CnFyqUY/V76jyTpC4MI/AAAAAAAAAKg/1rOFaFU4VV4mqDSPgth94QOUibemNnVawCLcB/s1600/Lifting-Others.jpg"], "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-03 08:55:21 |
last_update | 2017-06-03 08:56:15 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-06-10 08:55:21 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 1,043 |
author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
@abit @smooth are you still flagging content to balance rewards? Mine didn't even reach the $200 mark... there are a numerous blog posts that have earned a lot more in a shorter period of time :-((( Quite unfair...
post_id | 3,302,995 |
---|---|
author | surfermarly |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t155832010z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["abit", "smooth"], "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 15:58:27 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 15:58:27 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 15:58:27 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 214 |
author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
So currently I go for 1 post (piece of content created) every 1 or 2 days, largely because I like to proofread and go over my work a lot to ensure quality. The rest of my time is spent largely upvoting, and commenting whenever I see a place where I might possibly have some input that could be of value. I'd be tempted to install the Instagram-like Steem app that some clever person here developed and do more "content creation" on the fly using that, but that would limit editorial capability I suspect.
post_id | 3,311,572 |
---|---|
author | synapse |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170602t204908077z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-02 20:49:09 |
last_update | 2017-06-02 20:49:09 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 93,863,982,502 |
last_payout | 2017-06-09 20:49:09 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.246 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.080 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 505 |
author_reputation | 1,475,329,032,694 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
surfermarly | 0 | 93,863,982,502 | 90% |
Good rhythm, @synapse! Quality is key, there is no doubt about that. In one of my latest videos I recommended that as well: taking sufficient time to go over things and don't publish until you're 100% sure that this is exactly what you want to communicate. We have to be aware that content will probably be forever on the blockchain, so it's good to be happy with it before clicking the publish button :) The description of your profile is really interesting: "Hacker, Chemist and Traveler" - cool combination! :) Followed.
post_id | 3,328,703 |
---|---|
author | surfermarly |
permlink | re-synapse-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170603t090032109z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["synapse"], "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-03 09:00:27 |
last_update | 2017-06-03 09:00:27 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 1,098,770,896 |
last_payout | 2017-06-10 09:00:27 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 524 |
author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
synapse | 0 | 1,098,770,896 | 100% |
Brillant discussion you created, it is difficult if you want to reward all - voting power declines quite fast some days but always new great talent arriving here, you do it in an excellent way. Resteeming
post_id | 3,327,563 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
author | uwelang | ||||||
permlink | re-surfermarly-201763t10043450z | ||||||
category | rewards | ||||||
json_metadata | "{"app": "esteem/1.4.5", "format": "markdown+html", "community": "esteem", "tags": "rewards"}" | ||||||
created | 2017-06-03 08:00:45 | ||||||
last_update | 2017-06-03 08:00:45 | ||||||
depth | 1 | ||||||
children | 2 | ||||||
net_rshares | 211,144,336,563 | ||||||
last_payout | 2017-06-10 08:00:45 | ||||||
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 | ||||||
total_payout_value | 0.656 SBD | ||||||
curator_payout_value | 0.091 SBD | ||||||
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD | ||||||
promoted | 0.000 SBD | ||||||
body_length | 204 | ||||||
author_reputation | 351,200,847,744,945 | ||||||
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" | ||||||
beneficiaries |
| ||||||
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD | ||||||
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 | ||||||
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
carlos-cabeza | 0 | 289,349,805 | 11% | ||
dahaz159 | 0 | 444,821,340 | 11% | ||
good-karma | 0 | 88,684,665,603 | 11% | ||
mysteem | 0 | 504,490,265 | 11% | ||
happyphoenix | 0 | 157,279,647 | 1.1% | ||
surfermarly | 0 | 104,293,313,892 | 100% | ||
demo | 0 | 971,361,650 | 11% | ||
pjo | 0 | 256,309,681 | 11% | ||
feruz | 0 | 9,114,803,238 | 11% | ||
esteemapp | 0 | 335,338,568 | 11% | ||
reisman | 0 | 667,218,702 | 8.8% | ||
irawandedy | 0 | 703,388,504 | 11% | ||
gildar | 0 | 795,584,421 | 11% | ||
bounties | 0 | 1,034,631,923 | 11% | ||
steempoll | 0 | 1,001,908,957 | 11% | ||
evildeathcore | 0 | 405,345,733 | 11% | ||
awesomianist | 0 | 225,315,030 | 11% | ||
tipping | 0 | 912,758,999 | 11% | ||
jackchalat | 0 | 346,450,605 | 11% |
Thanks for your great support, Uwe! What I enjoy most about opening threads like this one is that you come to know so many different points of view. People are amazing and I love to share ideas in a friendly and respectful ambient.
post_id | 3,328,236 |
---|---|
author | surfermarly |
permlink | re-uwelang-re-surfermarly-201763t10043450z-20170603t083512591z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-03 08:35:06 |
last_update | 2017-06-03 08:35:06 |
depth | 2 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 14,627,622,286 |
last_payout | 2017-06-10 08:35:06 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.038 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.012 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 231 |
author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
uwelang | 0 | 14,627,622,286 | 15% |
True, only sharing is caring 🐺
post_id | 3,328,819 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
author | uwelang | ||||||
permlink | re-surfermarly-201763t11441620z | ||||||
category | rewards | ||||||
json_metadata | "{"app": "esteem/1.4.5", "format": "markdown+html", "community": "esteem", "tags": "rewards"}" | ||||||
created | 2017-06-03 09:04:45 | ||||||
last_update | 2017-06-03 09:04:45 | ||||||
depth | 3 | ||||||
children | 0 | ||||||
net_rshares | 0 | ||||||
last_payout | 2017-06-10 09:04:45 | ||||||
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 | ||||||
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD | ||||||
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD | ||||||
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD | ||||||
promoted | 0.000 SBD | ||||||
body_length | 30 | ||||||
author_reputation | 351,200,847,744,945 | ||||||
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" | ||||||
beneficiaries |
| ||||||
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD | ||||||
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
Hi @surfermarly, I was reading the comments and I think all logic replies are given. What crosses my mind is that the fact that you are even thinking about how to devide your attention and votingpower, shows you are a wonderful person someone would love to be friends with. Saying this, let's look at it as being a friendship. In "real life" you have a group of friends that you like being with. Since there are only 24hrs in a day and you got stuff to do, you can not devote all your time to them. But you follow them anyways, so it's ok. In this group of friends there are a couple that you hang out with most of the time. This equals quantity (hopefully also quality haha). Then there is this one friend you only get together with once in a couple weeks or months, but when you do it feels safe and familiair and you are having a great time. This equals quality. And there are these friends you hang around with because they are actually more friends of your friends. In some cases you get to know each other better and you grow closer and in some cases you feel there is none connection what so ever. Thats life. Basically what I am trying to say is that people will appreciate you if you upvote or comment them on every article, but they will also appreciate you when you don't do this on every article but just give one great heartwarming comment once in a while. At least this is what I like to believe... Hope this contributes a little bit :) Have a nice day and remember.. GoCocoNuts ;)
post_id | 3,327,748 |
---|---|
author | gococonuts |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170603t081146461z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["surfermarly"], "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-03 08:11:48 |
last_update | 2017-06-03 08:11:48 |
depth | 1 |
children | 2 |
net_rshares | 102,207,447,614 |
last_payout | 2017-06-10 08:11:48 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.274 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.091 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 1,505 |
author_reputation | 2,442,180,604,341 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
surfermarly | 0 | 102,207,447,614 | 100% |
**What a wonderful comment which could be actually a great article on its own! :)** That's a brilliant example which really demonstrates that it's not about providing an equal amount of attention or rewards to everybody, but knowing how and when to selectively distribute it. My friends are all living far away from me (except two of them), so you really hit the nail in my case :) I haven't seen my best friend for 5 years since he's living in the US and me in Spain. But we will be together in 10 days!! Then we'll fill our hearts with friendship, adventure, experience, laughter, joy, emotion and love again so that we'll be able to survive the next years without seeing each other...:) Again, thanks for your valuable thoughts which are highly appreciated! Have a great day, too.
post_id | 3,328,904 |
---|---|
author | surfermarly |
permlink | re-gococonuts-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170603t090818010z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-03 09:08:12 |
last_update | 2017-06-03 09:08:12 |
depth | 2 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-06-10 09:08:12 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 788 |
author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
Hi@surfermarly, That isn't a bad idea actually. I'll think about using this for a article later on :) The situation you have with your friends is exactly a great example! I hope you guys will have much fun being together again and sharing everything that you've missed from each other over the past time. Where in Spain do you live? We have visited Spain many times now and we've just finished a piece on Valencia. We put it online like 10 minutes ago. Next up is probably going to be Madrid or Barcelona :)
post_id | 3,332,617 |
---|---|
author | gococonuts |
permlink | re-surfermarly-re-gococonuts-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170603t115240813z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-03 11:52:42 |
last_update | 2017-06-03 11:52:42 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-06-10 11:52:42 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 509 |
author_reputation | 2,442,180,604,341 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
# Have whale bots made human curation redundant on Steemit? > The moment you decide to support one person you automatically decide to NOT support another. ##### You are assuming that all curation is done by humans, @surfermarly. It would be interesting to find out: ##### 1. How much do bots curate? 1.1 Raw votes? 1.2 Voting percentages? 1.3 Voting strength? 1.3 Net impact on rewards? ##### Anecdotally, I assume that human curation has an insignificant impact on Steemit curation. Is human curation relevant on Steemit anymore? ##### 2. Human curation depends on: 2.1 Integrity of the curator 2.1.1 Am I upvoting only the best content? 2.1.2 Am I gaming the upvote process? 2.1.3 Am I factoring in the maximum return from the upvote for myself? 2.2 The human attention span 2.2.1 How much time can I dedicate to curation? 2.2.2 What is the cash value of my time? Is curation worth it? Compared with other things that generate cash for me? https://todaysrant2017.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/4865902d23.jpg?w=616 > Now I'd love to know how you manage to distribute your voting power 'fairly'? ##### I've not cracked the code on how to be _fair_ on Steemit. More important, I wonder if it is even possible to be just when curating?
post_id | 3,329,507 |
---|---|
author | nigelmarkdias |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170603t093738726z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["surfermarly"], "image": ["https://todaysrant2017.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/4865902d23.jpg?w=616"], "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-03 09:37:36 |
last_update | 2017-06-03 09:37:36 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 11,188,704,380 |
last_payout | 2017-06-10 09:37:36 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.038 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 1,241 |
author_reputation | 86,651,837,734,680 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
nigelmarkdias | 0 | 11,188,704,380 | 100% |
I think it is a bit like being a good parent. You always wonder if you do enough and good enough for those your are responsible for. And as long as you worry about it you are on the right path. Might not be perfect but no parent is perfect. So as long as we wonder and we worry about the right thing I guess we are on the right track...
post_id | 3,329,536 |
---|---|
author | koalafamily |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170603t093921977z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-03 09:39:24 |
last_update | 2017-06-03 09:39:24 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-06-10 09:39:24 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 336 |
author_reputation | 1,246,107,630,900 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
@surfermarly, this is a nice article. I have blogged here for three months. Curating all the contents you value is becoming impossible. Applying your suggestions would be great. Thanks for this.
post_id | 3,331,332 |
---|---|
author | ogoowinner |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170603t105950418z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["surfermarly"], "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-03 10:59:57 |
last_update | 2017-06-03 10:59:57 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-06-10 10:59:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 197 |
author_reputation | 108,809,462,926,222 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
Justice is not equal my friend. And you can't help everyone.
post_id | 3,346,047 |
---|---|
author | the-ego-is-you |
permlink | re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170603t182033570z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-03 18:20:33 |
last_update | 2017-06-03 18:20:33 |
depth | 1 |
children | 2 |
net_rshares | 56,318,389,501 |
last_payout | 2017-06-10 18:20:33 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.187 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.014 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 60 |
author_reputation | 7,025,328,989,730 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
surfermarly | 0 | 56,318,389,501 | 59% |
I'm not trying to...:) And you are completely right. Thanks for stopping by!
post_id | 3,346,372 |
---|---|
author | surfermarly |
permlink | re-the-ego-is-you-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170603t183012015z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-03 18:30:06 |
last_update | 2017-06-03 18:30:06 |
depth | 2 |
children | 1 |
net_rshares | 3,787,147,202 |
last_payout | 2017-06-10 18:30:06 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 76 |
author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
the-ego-is-you | 0 | 3,787,147,202 | 100% |
No your post made it clear you've come further than that. Thanks for sharing! =)
post_id | 3,347,795 |
---|---|
author | the-ego-is-you |
permlink | re-surfermarly-re-the-ego-is-you-re-surfermarly-what-is-the-ideal-share-of-attention-can-we-be-successful-content-creators-and-fair-curators-at-the-same-time-20170603t191807120z |
category | rewards |
json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["rewards"]}" |
created | 2017-06-03 19:18:06 |
last_update | 2017-06-03 19:18:06 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-06-10 19:18:06 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 80 |
author_reputation | 7,025,328,989,730 |
root_title | "What Is The Ideal Share Of Attention? Can We Be Successful Content Creators And Fair Curators At The Same Time?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |