Viewing a response to: @ervin-lemark/re-teamsteem-re-dan-re-nigelmarkdias-re-remlaps-a-game-theory-requirement-for-steem-downvotes-has-not-been-shown-20170423t194257395z
I already read them all but I'll re-read them because I feel like I might gain quite a lot from it. I'm not sure I understood everything there was to understand from these posts. I remember being really interested in them but not quite sure I understood all their implication. Thank you very much for your comment @ervin-lemark. I really appreciate it.
| post_id | 2,461,679 |
|---|---|
| author | teamsteem |
| permlink | re-ervin-lemark-re-teamsteem-re-dan-re-nigelmarkdias-re-remlaps-a-game-theory-requirement-for-steem-downvotes-has-not-been-shown-20170423t211327798z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["ervin-lemark"], "tags": ["steem"]}" |
| created | 2017-04-23 21:13:27 |
| last_update | 2017-04-23 21:13:27 |
| depth | 5 |
| children | 5 |
| net_rshares | 52,231,349,924 |
| last_payout | 2017-04-30 21:13:27 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 352 |
| author_reputation | 284,009,804,791,421 |
| root_title | "A game theory requirement for steem downvotes has not been shown" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ervin-lemark | 0 | 39,707,197,663 | 100% | ||
| remlaps | 0 | 12,524,152,261 | 100% |
You are welcome. I share your feelings :) My first impression, eight months ago, was that the ideas are very idealistic. (*what a sentence - ideas are always idealistic :)*) The thing is that the scenario in a way really happened. Canceling out the votes and such ...
| post_id | 2,461,705 |
|---|---|
| author | ervin-lemark |
| permlink | re-teamsteem-re-ervin-lemark-re-teamsteem-re-dan-re-nigelmarkdias-re-remlaps-a-game-theory-requirement-for-steem-downvotes-has-not-been-shown-20170423t211714781z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}" |
| created | 2017-04-23 21:17:15 |
| last_update | 2017-04-23 21:17:15 |
| depth | 6 |
| children | 4 |
| net_rshares | 51,420,998,951 |
| last_payout | 2017-04-30 21:17:15 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 270 |
| author_reputation | 130,483,487,426,039 |
| root_title | "A game theory requirement for steem downvotes has not been shown" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ervin-lemark | 0 | 38,896,846,690 | 100% | ||
| remlaps | 0 | 12,524,152,261 | 100% |
Idea are always idealistic. This is pure bliss. I won't forget that one. I agree that there's some quite of vote cancellation going on and it would only make sense to make it more precise and accessible to everyone. At least that's my feeling.
| post_id | 2,461,896 |
|---|---|
| author | teamsteem |
| permlink | re-ervin-lemark-re-teamsteem-re-ervin-lemark-re-teamsteem-re-dan-re-nigelmarkdias-re-remlaps-a-game-theory-requirement-for-steem-downvotes-has-not-been-shown-20170423t214218149z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}" |
| created | 2017-04-23 21:42:18 |
| last_update | 2017-04-23 21:42:18 |
| depth | 7 |
| children | 3 |
| net_rshares | 38,086,495,717 |
| last_payout | 2017-04-30 21:42:18 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 245 |
| author_reputation | 284,009,804,791,421 |
| root_title | "A game theory requirement for steem downvotes has not been shown" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ervin-lemark | 0 | 38,086,495,717 | 100% |
I agree with you feelings. Two issues though: 1. Do two wrongs make it right? Meaning first a somehow *wrong* upvote and then the downvote to correct this *wrong*. 2. The original sin is the power distribution. As long as this is not properly addressed and fixed there will always be issues like this one. No matter what you do, try, test, experiment, ... In Dan's scenario all votes are equal. Here they are not!
| post_id | 2,461,950 |
|---|---|
| author | ervin-lemark |
| permlink | re-teamsteem-re-ervin-lemark-re-teamsteem-re-ervin-lemark-re-teamsteem-re-dan-re-nigelmarkdias-re-remlaps-a-game-theory-requirement-for-steem-downvotes-has-not-been-shown-20170423t214842932z |
| category | steem |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steem"]}" |
| created | 2017-04-23 21:48:42 |
| last_update | 2017-04-23 21:49:36 |
| depth | 8 |
| children | 2 |
| net_rshares | 50,610,647,978 |
| last_payout | 2017-04-30 21:48:42 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 414 |
| author_reputation | 130,483,487,426,039 |
| root_title | "A game theory requirement for steem downvotes has not been shown" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ervin-lemark | 0 | 38,086,495,717 | 100% | ||
| remlaps | 0 | 12,524,152,261 | 100% |