Of course I don't disagree with the protection of children. It's actually where I have trouble with radical libertarianism, social accountability in a world where some want their private property homestead to be their little kingdom.

Of course we agree on the basics. What you have presented are cases which are clearly wrong and I had intended to express agreement with that and your general point.

My deeper reading of your post and the way you say things is a lack of maturity in dealing with the topic and showing some prejudice towards drag queens and others. I presume this is what triggered @sapphic . I'll back this up with an example:

> If transgender drag queens want even more normalization they should stop trying to encourage children to behave in perverted ways.

Sweeping statement which implies this is what all drag queens do. Do you understand how your loose use of language may paint you in a way you don't intend? Or it may show you to harbor prejudice. When people perceive sexual deviance they can often react with _disgust_, which is a very strong and motivating emotion, but it is an emotion.

You do you, I'm not the language police. I'm just stating something which is fairly obvious.