Viewing a response to: @surfermarly/this-platform-returns-value-to-those-who-create-value-that-was-the-original-idea-of-steem-according-to-ned-scott-amsterdam-2016
We are lacking a Leader who is willing to share a vision for the SteemIt Platform. It is because he is no longer focused on the SteemIt platform, they haven't been dishonest about that. They are focused on the Steem blockchain and SMTs, Fabric before that. It will be interesting to see what happens to SteemIt after communities and SMTs are released.
| post_id | 25,498,984 |
|---|---|
| author | whatsup |
| permlink | re-surfermarly-this-platform-returns-value-to-those-who-create-value-that-was-the-original-idea-of-steem-according-to-ned-scott-amsterdam-2016-20180113t212606589z |
| category | steemit |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}" |
| created | 2018-01-13 21:26:09 |
| last_update | 2018-01-13 21:26:09 |
| depth | 1 |
| children | 1 |
| net_rshares | 293,995,838,961 |
| last_payout | 2018-01-20 21:26:09 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 2.060 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.402 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 356 |
| author_reputation | 404,265,487,362,343 |
| root_title | "'This Platform Returns Value To Those Who Create Value' - That Was The Original Idea Of Steem According To Ned Scott (Amsterdam 2016) || Are We Still Following The Same Vision?" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| surfermarly | 0 | 262,799,931,137 | 100% | ||
| whatsup | 0 | 31,195,907,824 | 7% |
> It is because he is no longer focused on the SteemIt platform, they haven't been dishonest about that. I know :-( Still the fact that they haven't been dishonest about it, doesn't really justify the action. Steemit.com is the most valuable application built on the Steem blockchain. It's the unbeatable no. 1. We all know that it's still a baby that has their childhood diseases, but as long as nobody wants to fight them, how might it ever start to grow? Now my question is: why not addressing these issues first, make the no. 1 reference (the store sign for Steem) a shiny, successful, desirable, fast growing pilot project - and THEN start building new ideas on top of it?!? It's as if Steemit.com had become an annoying albatross around the neck.
| post_id | 25,580,904 |
|---|---|
| author | surfermarly |
| permlink | re-whatsup-re-surfermarly-this-platform-returns-value-to-those-who-create-value-that-was-the-original-idea-of-steem-according-to-ned-scott-amsterdam-2016-20180114t084241502z |
| category | steemit |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["steemit"]}" |
| created | 2018-01-14 08:42:45 |
| last_update | 2018-01-14 08:42:45 |
| depth | 2 |
| children | 0 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
| last_payout | 2018-01-21 08:42:45 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 758 |
| author_reputation | 318,664,242,178,673 |
| root_title | "'This Platform Returns Value To Those Who Create Value' - That Was The Original Idea Of Steem According To Ned Scott (Amsterdam 2016) || Are We Still Following The Same Vision?" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |