RE: Proposal: Paid Advertising on Steem (with a Twist) by remotediscovery

Viewing a response to: @quillfire/re-timcliff-proposal-paid-advertising-on-steem-with-a-twist-20180907t004300708z

advertising · @remotediscovery · Sep 7 '18

If I was running a company, I would take interest in you immediately. You should write proposal and submit it to the company. Maybe you can work for them, or be a consultant. We need talented people to redesign the platform.

👍 quillfire

`post_id`	61,866,094
`author`	remotediscovery
`permlink`	re-quillfire-re-timcliff-proposal-paid-advertising-on-steem-with-a-twist-20180907t201035064z
`category`	advertising
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["advertising"]}
`created`	2018-09-07 20:10:27
`last_update`	2018-09-07 20:10:27
`depth`	2
`children`	11
`net_rshares`	1,266,896,399
`last_payout`	2018-09-14 20:10:27
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	224
`author_reputation`	914,347,140,670
`root_title`	"Proposal: Paid Advertising on Steem (with a Twist)"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
quillfire	0 B		1,266,896,399	100%

@quillfire · Sep 9 '18

@remotediscovery,

Thanks for the ego boost! :-) 

I'd love to help out in any way I could, although, I can't help wonder if the "company" *(I presume you mean Steemit Inc.)* wouldn't rather hang me from a yardarm. My ideas have generated controversy in some quarters.

*Quill*

👍 remotediscovery

`post_id`	62,028,920
`author`	quillfire
`permlink`	re-remotediscovery-re-quillfire-re-timcliff-proposal-paid-advertising-on-steem-with-a-twist-20180909t204628002z
`category`	advertising
`json_metadata`	{"users":["remotediscovery"],"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["advertising"]}
`created`	2018-09-09 20:46:30
`last_update`	2018-09-09 20:46:30
`depth`	3
`children`	10
`net_rshares`	1,284,319,409
`last_payout`	2018-09-16 20:46:30
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	277
`author_reputation`	12,783,997,194,630
`root_title`	"Proposal: Paid Advertising on Steem (with a Twist)"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
remotediscovery	0 B		1,284,319,409	100%

@remotediscovery · Sep 10 '18 (edited)

I just though of this yesturday. They seem to be afraid of programming, and getting all the UI's to agree. What if we had an advertising model that ran like focus groups?

What if we convinced small businesses and companies, to purchase temporary Steempower, and used their upvotes to get the community to engage with their upcoming product development?

Say if a fashion company, wants some ideas about their brand. They could spend $300 an hour on consultants, or drop $300 on 1 weeks delegation, and provide high powered upvotes, for those who give them the best feed back.

Use the corporate advertising model, to fund paid reviews through high-powered upvotes. They would do what there are doing, but have an official Steem account.

Say if their upvotes are worth $1 each. If someone gives them a good idea, they could provide them with a full upvote. If someone just participates, they could be generous enough to give them a 10% upvote.

I'm a firm believer that the future of advertising can incorporate self-feedback loops to mutual benefit. We no longer need Static advertising. Our experience could be interactive and community driven.

Steem could be a platform, where advertising runs like interactive focus groups. There post get trending, but many people are paid along the way for helping them out.

They could also have a Steem market to sell some of their products, and offer discounts to everyone who participated, and resteemed their post. This could go a great ways to divert our dependency on investors, and boost the Steem price.

It gives the community opportunities to earn high powered upvotes, by helping companies make some decisions. It could be an interesting experience for all sides. I would love to hear your ideas on this. What would you include in this model?

properties (22)

`post_id`	62,035,413
`author`	remotediscovery
`permlink`	re-quillfire-re-remotediscovery-re-quillfire-re-timcliff-proposal-paid-advertising-on-steem-with-a-twist-20180909t230547271z
`category`	advertising
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit\/0.1","tags":["advertising"]}
`created`	2018-09-09 23:05:45
`last_update`	2018-09-10 00:10:15
`depth`	4
`children`	9
`net_rshares`	0
`last_payout`	2018-09-16 23:05:45
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	1,796
`author_reputation`	914,347,140,670
`root_title`	"Proposal: Paid Advertising on Steem (with a Twist)"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000

@quillfire · Sep 10 '18

@remotediscovery,

**DELETE this comment immediately!!!** Those are ALL my ideas! :-)

My initial comments still stand, however. Steemit would only be valuable to companies if it operated as it was designed to operate. All the *"cheating mechanisms,"* would skew results making them worse than worthless ... false intelligence is worse than no intelligence. Companies need ACCURATE feedback. 

There's a LOT of ways Steemit could generate TREMENDOUS WEALTH for its users ... **_but it has to run a clean game_** ... or all that potential becomes meaningless. 

The cheating is TOXIC to institutions. They will not sully themselves with our disrepute *(they create enough problems for themselves without dealing with ours as well).* 

You are a smart fellow. Perhaps we both ought to be consultants for the company! Nice to make your acquaintance. I've followed.

BTW ... the next time you have a brainstorm ... don't put it in the comments section ... *DM me!* :-)

@timcliff ... HERE, is a guy *who's thinking.* 

Perhaps what the blockchain needs is to assemble a braintrust of people ... **_who can't code_** to offer up some non-coding solutions. To a man with a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. There's no "diversity of thought" ... it's all tech-heads. Not every problem has a solution that can be reduced to an algorithm. 

*Quill*

👍 remotediscovery

`post_id`	62,044,600
`author`	quillfire
`permlink`	re-remotediscovery-re-quillfire-re-remotediscovery-re-quillfire-re-timcliff-proposal-paid-advertising-on-steem-with-a-twist-20180910t020144541z
`category`	advertising
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit\/0.1","users":["remotediscovery","timcliff"],"tags":["advertising"]}
`created`	2018-09-10 02:01:48
`last_update`	2018-09-10 02:01:48
`depth`	5
`children`	2
`net_rshares`	1,277,595,224
`last_payout`	2018-09-17 02:01:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	1,346
`author_reputation`	12,783,997,194,630
`root_title`	"Proposal: Paid Advertising on Steem (with a Twist)"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
remotediscovery	0 B		1,277,595,224	100%

2 replies

@oups · Sep 11 '18

$300 = 420 Steem 
420 Steem = 0.02 STU upvote for 100% (0.01 after 90% :))
meaning, daily 0.2 STU, weekly 1.4 STU of upvotes without 25% curation and 50% of SP -.-
if my math is not failing me. I hope it does but..

for 1 STU upvote you need 28.000,00 SP 

these could be usable on specific dapps but not in the main sites.
Say steemhunt (clone of producthunt) could benefit from this approach, has a targeted audience, has a front-page so why not. 

where will that fashion ad will be displayed? near my logo design post? :(

👍 remotediscovery

`post_id`	62,189,712
`author`	oups
`permlink`	re-remotediscovery-re-quillfire-re-remotediscovery-re-quillfire-re-timcliff-proposal-paid-advertising-on-steem-with-a-twist-20180911t162133996z
`category`	advertising
`json_metadata`	{"community":"busy","app":"busy\/2.5.6","format":"markdown","users":[],"tags":["advertising"],"links":[],"image":[]}
`created`	2018-09-11 16:21:36
`last_update`	2018-09-11 16:21:36
`depth`	5
`children`	5
`net_rshares`	1,272,208,871
`last_payout`	2018-09-18 16:21:36
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	525
`author_reputation`	20,680,239,095,011
`root_title`	"Proposal: Paid Advertising on Steem (with a Twist)"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
remotediscovery	0 B		1,272,208,871	100%

5 replies