![download (1).jpg](https://ipfs.busy.org/ipfs/QmT48CSEoepwo6vL6xa1Kdqx18oZJykkFzEdxykuzWweny) [Picture from cointelegraph](http://www.cointelegraph.com) To be honest, when I first read this news, the first thing I did was laugh out loud, literally, laugh out. For those who aren't aware or those who are new to the Crypto world, Craig wright, a self proclaimed doctor and billionaire, also his doctor is probably an academic one rather than a medical doc, has been claiming to be satoshi nakamoto since 2015. Satoshi nakamoto is the person or persons who crested bitcoin and basically kick started the whole cryptocurrency industry. He/she/they were anonymous from the start and disappeared from public light in 2013. Since then, all mediums they used in communicating has gone quiet for over 6 years now. Craig wright claim to being satoshi has however, never been proven and he continues to try different antics over the years to win people to his side. The one way anyone can verify to be satoshi nakamoto is to sign a transaction using the private key of the one single address that the world knows belongs to satoshi nakamoto. Craig has never been able to do that. While it does appear that Craig has some early connection to the bitcoin community, it is more than likely that he was just someone who knew about it early on and was fascinated. There are allegations that Craig cant even code. In 2017, craig supported the splitting of the original bitcoin into what is now known as bitcoin cash, this move was to "fix" the problem with bitcoin in terms of block sizes and all that It still baffles me that an inventor will wish to destroy his creation in such a way, rather than drumming for support to fix it fully in the original chain. In 2018, Craig single handedly made statements that he would dump bitcoin if he didn't have his way, causing panic and FUD, while we were in a critical support level. This led to a war in the bch community that led to bch splitting into bsv and bch. Mining power was borrowed from bitcoin to finance this war and these affected bitcoin so much that the value of bitcoin dropped below a critical support level. My question remains, why would Craig wan to destroy and discredit his original creation and why cant he prove he is Satoshi , **if he really was Satoshi** My verdict is that Craig is not Saoshi until he brings full proof and in crypto currency, the only proof that can be accepted is the signing of a message with the Satoshi original private key.