Viewing a response to: @isnochys/py635b
Isn't all paid content and even not paid content proof of popularity? And I am not sure what you are reacting to since I don't even know who a few of these people are.
post_id | 80,191,507 |
---|---|
author | whatsup |
permlink | py65ar |
category | busy |
json_metadata | {"tags":["busy"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
created | 2019-09-21 06:42:30 |
last_update | 2019-09-21 06:42:30 |
depth | 2 |
children | 5 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2019-09-28 06:42:30 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 168 |
author_reputation | 404,265,487,362,343 |
root_title | "A Look At Your Top 30 Paid Authors... " |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
Just because they are popular doesn't mean, you have to know them. Ask me about today's music, I couldn't list 10 popular contemporary performers :) Hm, maybe some weird science papers, that are not really popular, but to peer review would be proof of brain? Couldn't think of another example :))
post_id | 80,191,753 |
---|---|
author | isnochys |
permlink | py65tz |
category | busy |
json_metadata | {"tags":["busy"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
created | 2019-09-21 06:54:03 |
last_update | 2019-09-21 06:54:03 |
depth | 3 |
children | 4 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2019-09-28 06:54:03 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 297 |
author_reputation | 36,963,899,244,133 |
root_title | "A Look At Your Top 30 Paid Authors... " |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
I've always viewed Steem as a social media platform vs a content discovery platform, but I get what you are saying. Personally I think it is unrealistic expectations. Of course I care more about opinions, views, posts created by people I know.
post_id | 80,191,857 |
---|---|
author | whatsup |
permlink | py664h |
category | busy |
json_metadata | {"tags":["busy"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
created | 2019-09-21 07:00:21 |
last_update | 2019-09-21 07:00:21 |
depth | 4 |
children | 3 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2019-09-28 07:00:21 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 245 |
author_reputation | 404,265,487,362,343 |
root_title | "A Look At Your Top 30 Paid Authors... " |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
And I just repeat, what a lot of people already claimed, as a content discovery platform, it sucks, as there is no good mechanism to discover new good content. And as a social platform it lacks some basic features, that other platforms have. Not sure, if both points are frontend, which would be a good thing, as it is solvable quiet "easy" or a backend issue.. HFs are hard:/ Some people like to compare it to Facebook, which it clearly isn't, or to reddit, but it is more a subreddit r/steemit, than a complete platform. But let's wait for the communities. Maybe they will solve it. Or not and it will be just one big community and a lot of tiny ones.
post_id | 80,191,976 |
---|---|
author | isnochys |
permlink | py66gc |
category | busy |
json_metadata | {"tags":["busy"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"} |
created | 2019-09-21 07:07:27 |
last_update | 2019-09-21 07:07:27 |
depth | 5 |
children | 2 |
net_rshares | 0 |
last_payout | 2019-09-28 07:07:27 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
promoted | 0.000 SBD |
body_length | 659 |
author_reputation | 36,963,899,244,133 |
root_title | "A Look At Your Top 30 Paid Authors... " |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |