Thank you deeply.

(Some significance here is that (besides how I love and loved [@CrackedOnCBC.ca](https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://twitter.com/CrackedOnCBC) because it shows a cop with a doc, like police + doctor (maybe my inspiration for policedoctor/[prismdoctor.com](http://whois.sc/prismdoctor.com) if you think about the wordmath order of operations [when I say PRISM](https://steemd.com/csychology/@scribe/celf-self-text)), with which is not what US law requires yet, [I mean we have the government grandstanding about regulations for corporations "causing" problems, while themself running their own secret/shadow ops/mods/cops using the same *EXACT* unregulated "algorithmic" (code for "human er robot or law, I will not confirm or deny because I do not have to describe what my job is") hacking/tricks/tools which superconveniently are not being addressed in any congressional hearings (which are humor for the educated people who know Russia is not "hacking" by *buying with a credit card* some Adverts, and Cambridge Analytica is not "hacking" by using an open public facing API, and the NSA *100% owns every encryption algorithm* but does not have a shred of decency I mean transparency, but poor people do not know better so it sells "We did not know what was happening because we were busy NYT/CNN marketers doing it ourselves and getting away with it now we're ignorantly pointing fingers suddenly playing every side like fools and idiots singularly blaming Mark Z for inventing the internet alone in their room" paranoid sensationalized hitjob newspapers, oh you mean the newspapers do not take responsibility for social *media* huh, we did not know the internet has been around for decades the same *EXACT* unchanged code?, how super...), where is the hearing about how rogue Oath.com cops are hacking around, instead of just talking like broken facial recognition about Mark Z's face?](https://steemit.com/csychology/@scribe/celf-self-text)), but it's good to hear someone cared enough to think about making it a documentary of how that could work, I mean besides that...) I think my replier https://steemit.com/csychology/@wikitextbot/20200710t183713147z is https://steemit.com//@steemcenterwiki maybe? [@wikitextbot == @steemcenterwiki?])

Recognize, I mean please recognize, that I realize I might be replying here to a robot er a human who knows? Technically "Steemit the Organization" requires KYC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Know_your_customer but the Know Your Customer is not shown transparently, maybe that's a place for the government to start instead of just having congressional hearings hacking at corporations and individuals like me, maybe Oath.com could start to KYC itself first and lead by example, maybe we need Oath.com Badge Numbers as much as Mark Z's testimony, can I call that hashtag #KnowYourCop? er #KnowYourCops? or in codequote ``Know Your Cop``?

Let me make another prediction, that by the year 2037 maybe a congressional hearing will feature an actual Senator in the "Intelligence" committee (I know a lot of law is silent letters, but I do not think Oath.com is even on paper yet) asking for rule or law to mean rule of code meaning Code is Law as Law is Code meaning transparency for law is the same as transparency for code and if law is open then code is open too by law.

Because I'm talking to what could be a human er robot or myself here, I will make another prediction while we're there, that by the year 3007 we will have a normal Senator in the Normal Police Committee talk about giving Oath.com Officers Badge Numbers, for real.

Oh and if we're talking about that already, I might as well make a prediction about another point, that by the year 2051, somereader will acknowledge first 1 then 2 points by 2049 err 2051, that me @scribe is not a religious scribe meaning even if alot of bots/cops (used in the pejorative (tone) [to describe Oath.com cops who do not have badge numbers nor code/law transparency on paper in writing {so I'm saying I wrote that spelling on purpose/consciously/intentionally/deliberately, if we do not track the police we can not technically track anyone I'm talking about anywhere}]), and (again, by 2049/2051 ideally)that Oath.com is enough said when I write Oath.com and speak with a serious voice while some (cop?) audience members laugh for fun at having Oath.com Badge Numbers for the first time.

Ohh why not I realize/empathize some people are winning mad money/props while waiting/stalling/delaying before establishing Oath.com Standards/Oath.com Law(s) (must be fun to be a cop/mod and not follow public written laws er legal systems, what's the rush then right? Let's blame Mark Z for the Oath.com "cops" running the legal game to the gamut, then give Oath.com time to cover their [.css](https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/read.en.html)), but maybe by 2040 some cop will invent a way to run their games with a ``chat interrogation room`` just like/same/equal an ``interrogation room`` *(wordmath #ChatRoom + #InterrogationRoom = #ChatInterrogationRoom?)*, with the same rule(s) of law. You know, the kind of law like US Laws which are in writing, with the same rights, responsibilities...

I will state my opinion til proven fact, that the version of the "Wild West" of the Internet happened for the police before it happened for the public (`Mark Z` did not invent `Cop Z`, `Judge U`, `Law Z` nor `Mod Z`), and that story is not in writing yet because it sounds like how we're scapegoating Mark Z instead of acknowledging Oath.com.

Thank you for your comment, human or cop name(?). I appreciate you wrote the summary from the Wikipedia article, that is really intelligent. Is that called "Artificial Intelligence" er "Emotional Intelligence" to Know Your Customer/Client/Cop? ~~Is that called "Artificial Intelligence" or "copy/paste while not using (directly attributing of) your (the programmer behind the algorithm) name"?~~ At some point code law might require documentation of all changes, even me talking with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA here, er ELIZA + human being?