RE: Thoughts for Curation Guilds by everittdmickey

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @timcliff/re-everittdmickey-re-timcliff-thoughts-for-curation-guilds-20161031t031951079z

· @everittdmickey ·
today..."curation"  'bots' for example.
The whole point of 'curation' is an inhouse replication of a free market economy. That is...you read a post (analogous to a newpaper or a paperback book)...you like it...you buy it..

Only we got the order wrong. We get paid (bribed?) to upvote something. I suspect the majority of which never gets looked at by human eyes.  There's a disconnect.  To work well it should be reconnected.   I dunno how.
👍  ,
properties (23)
post_id1,272,772
authoreverittdmickey
permlinkre-timcliff-re-everittdmickey-re-timcliff-thoughts-for-curation-guilds-20161031t033447332z
categorycuration-guilds
json_metadata"{"tags": ["curation-guilds"]}"
created2016-10-31 03:34:48
last_update2016-10-31 03:34:48
depth3
children7
net_rshares20,635,559,814
last_payout2016-12-01 16:25:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length441
author_reputation235,625,463,700,046
root_title"Thoughts for Curation Guilds"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@timcliff ·
I agree that today it's bad. I think most people do too. The proposal of curation guilds is intended to address that very issue. I'm really hoping that it will work!
properties (22)
post_id1,272,791
authortimcliff
permlinkre-everittdmickey-re-timcliff-re-everittdmickey-re-timcliff-thoughts-for-curation-guilds-20161031t033904765z
categorycuration-guilds
json_metadata"{"tags": ["curation-guilds"]}"
created2016-10-31 03:39:00
last_update2016-10-31 03:39:00
depth4
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2016-12-01 16:25:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length165
author_reputation262,354,724,187,317
root_title"Thoughts for Curation Guilds"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@everittdmickey · (edited)
It would seem to me that 'curation guilds' and ' voting bots' are gaming the system.
at the moment I have	1,718,735 units from posting.  During the same time it took to get that I have 4,473 units from  Curation.Three orders of magnitude lower I think? Millions vs thousands.  Perhaps I should be less concerned with what pays less and more concerned with what pays more?
properties (22)
post_id1,272,823
authoreverittdmickey
permlinkre-everittdmickey-re-timcliff-re-everittdmickey-re-timcliff-thoughts-for-curation-guilds-20161031t034849687z
categorycuration-guilds
json_metadata"{"tags": ["curation-guilds"]}"
created2016-10-31 03:48:48
last_update2016-10-31 03:54:12
depth4
children5
net_rshares0
last_payout2016-12-01 16:25:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length371
author_reputation235,625,463,700,046
root_title"Thoughts for Curation Guilds"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@timcliff ·
Would you rather have the whales using voting bots or curation guilds?
properties (22)
post_id1,272,844
authortimcliff
permlinkre-everittdmickey-re-everittdmickey-re-timcliff-re-everittdmickey-re-timcliff-thoughts-for-curation-guilds-20161031t035422736z
categorycuration-guilds
json_metadata"{"tags": ["curation-guilds"]}"
created2016-10-31 03:54:18
last_update2016-10-31 03:54:18
depth5
children1
net_rshares0
last_payout2016-12-01 16:25:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length70
author_reputation262,354,724,187,317
root_title"Thoughts for Curation Guilds"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@everittdmickey ·
Do I have a choice?
👍  
properties (23)
post_id1,273,008
authoreverittdmickey
permlinkre-timcliff-re-everittdmickey-re-everittdmickey-re-timcliff-re-everittdmickey-re-timcliff-thoughts-for-curation-guilds-20161031t043505356z
categorycuration-guilds
json_metadata"{"tags": ["curation-guilds"]}"
created2016-10-31 04:35:06
last_update2016-10-31 04:35:06
depth6
children0
net_rshares927,860,684
last_payout2016-12-01 16:25:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length19
author_reputation235,625,463,700,046
root_title"Thoughts for Curation Guilds"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@timcliff ·
Replying here due to nesting.

If it were up to you, which would you prefer the whales to use? Voting bots or voting guilds?
properties (22)
post_id1,273,047
authortimcliff
permlinkre-everittdmickey-re-everittdmickey-re-timcliff-re-everittdmickey-re-timcliff-thoughts-for-curation-guilds-20161031t045240959z
categorycuration-guilds
json_metadata"{"tags": ["curation-guilds"]}"
created2016-10-31 04:52:39
last_update2016-10-31 04:52:39
depth5
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2016-12-01 16:25:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length124
author_reputation262,354,724,187,317
root_title"Thoughts for Curation Guilds"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@everittdmickey · (edited)
Suppose I chose neither?
The IDEA is to read something, like/dislike vote/not vote/ flag.
.The very concept of guilds presupposes processing.
In fact I wouldn't argue to hard against eliminating curating rewards altogether.

but it's irrelevant. The whales built this place. They offered to let me come in and play.
I'm doing that.
If I invited someone to come play in my sandbox and they started complaining  about the toys I might just kicke them out.
So I'll just wait and see.
properties (22)
post_id1,273,106
authoreverittdmickey
permlinkre-everittdmickey-re-everittdmickey-re-timcliff-re-everittdmickey-re-timcliff-thoughts-for-curation-guilds-20161031t051354206z
categorycuration-guilds
json_metadata"{"tags": ["curation-guilds"]}"
created2016-10-31 05:13:54
last_update2016-10-31 05:16:00
depth5
children1
net_rshares0
last_payout2016-12-01 16:25:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length480
author_reputation235,625,463,700,046
root_title"Thoughts for Curation Guilds"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@timcliff ·
> The IDEA is to read something, like/dislike vote/not vote/ flag.

Because money is involved, the system needs to be setup in such a way that it can determine which content is "good". If there was no curation reward, there would not be very much incentive for people to spend the time finding good undiscovered content. They would just upvote for their friends stuff, and random things they came across that they liked.

>In fact I wouldn't argue to hard against eliminating curating rewards altogether.

You should read the comment from @luzcypher in <a href="https://steemit.com/rant/@timcliff/i-want-to-have-my-cake-and-eat-it-too-no-more-powerful-whales-and-the-price-of-steem-must-go-up">this post</a>. The post itself has nothing to do with curation, but the comment does a really good job explaining its importance.

>If I invited someone to come play in my sandbox and they started complaining about the toys I might just kicke them out.

Hehe, yeah. I totally agree. I have that exact same thought when people go on rants about how much this place "sucks". I'm not against constructive criticism and feedback (even this post has one thing I disagree with Ned on), but this place wouldn't exist at all if it weren't for Dan/Ned and the people who designed/built it and helped bring the system/community to life. We are interacting in a world that they created for us, and we should be thankful it is as awesome as it is :)
👍  
properties (23)
post_id1,273,249
authortimcliff
permlinkre-everittdmickey-re-everittdmickey-re-everittdmickey-re-timcliff-re-everittdmickey-re-timcliff-thoughts-for-curation-guilds-20161031t060610122z
categorycuration-guilds
json_metadata"{"users": ["luzcypher"], "links": ["https://steemit.com/rant/@timcliff/i-want-to-have-my-cake-and-eat-it-too-no-more-powerful-whales-and-the-price-of-steem-must-go-up"], "tags": ["curation-guilds"]}"
created2016-10-31 06:06:09
last_update2016-10-31 06:06:09
depth6
children0
net_rshares8,291,146,537
last_payout2016-12-01 16:25:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,431
author_reputation262,354,724,187,317
root_title"Thoughts for Curation Guilds"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)