RE: Vlog 459: A sad day for Steem by azircon

Viewing a response to: @exyle/q67l88

exyle · @azircon · Feb 24 '20 (edited)

$0.14

@exyle I am in favor of the soft fork.

I disagree that it happened behind closed door.

Please do not spread FUD. I have a lot more stake than you and I am not afraid that my account will ever be frozen.

The soft-fork is a safety measure against centralization and completely reversible. If this does not work for you, its fine. It is alright to have disagreement.

If Justin Sun bought the stake in open market, then this wouldn't have happened.

Yes, I can say that it will not happen to anyone else, especially you :)

👍 justineh, fitzgibbon

`post_id`	84,683,740
`author`	azircon
`permlink`	q67o6n
`category`	exyle
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit\/0.2","users":["exyle"]}
`created`	2020-02-24 14:56:48
`last_update`	2020-02-24 15:05:12
`depth`	3
`children`	12
`net_rshares`	804,951,851,513
`last_payout`	2020-03-02 14:56:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.069 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.068 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	522
`author_reputation`	79,432,823,472,427
`root_title`	"Vlog 459: A sad day for Steem"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
fitzgibbon	0 B		1,700,377,035	100%
justineh	0 B		803,251,474,478	56%

@marki99 · Feb 24 '20

$0.07

How can you say it didn't happen behind closed doors? Justin, the owner of the stake, was not involved. He's the first person to involve in this discussion.

👍 michealb, remotehorst23

`post_id`	84,684,855
`author`	marki99
`permlink`	q67ptt
`category`	exyle
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit\/0.2"}
`created`	2020-02-24 15:32:18
`last_update`	2020-02-24 15:32:18
`depth`	4
`children`	11
`net_rshares`	430,423,309,205
`last_payout`	2020-03-02 15:32:18
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.035 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.035 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	156
`author_reputation`	2,031,317,349,180
`root_title`	"Vlog 459: A sad day for Steem"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
remotehorst23	0 B		4,148,978,457	50%
michealb	0 B		426,274,330,748	5%

@azircon · Feb 24 '20

I do not think so. Justin Sun do not own Steem Blockchain. We do.

If you do not understand this, please consider educating yourself

properties (22)

`post_id`	84,684,903
`author`	azircon
`permlink`	q67pwg
`category`	exyle
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit\/0.2"}
`created`	2020-02-24 15:33:51
`last_update`	2020-02-24 15:33:51
`depth`	5
`children`	10
`net_rshares`	0
`last_payout`	2020-03-02 15:33:51
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	132
`author_reputation`	79,432,823,472,427
`root_title`	"Vlog 459: A sad day for Steem"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000

@marki99 · Feb 24 '20

Justin Sun owns his stake of the Steem blockchain like you own your stake of the blockchain. I'm not saying he owns the whole blockchain. 

But if witnesses could freeze a stake without talking to the owner, this would mean they own everybody's stake and the blockchain as a whole, and that there is no ownership for someone outside the witnesses.

👍 remotehorst23

`post_id`	84,685,107
`author`	marki99
`permlink`	q67q9j
`category`	exyle
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit\/0.2"}
`created`	2020-02-24 15:41:42
`last_update`	2020-02-24 15:41:42
`depth`	6
`children`	3
`net_rshares`	4,233,696,928
`last_payout`	2020-03-02 15:41:42
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	347
`author_reputation`	2,031,317,349,180
`root_title`	"Vlog 459: A sad day for Steem"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
remotehorst23	0 B		4,233,696,928	50%

3 replies

@exyle · Feb 24 '20

$0.25

You can see it in two ways.

Because only a select few people were involved and no-one knew about it the argument can be made that it was behind closed doors.

But on the other hand, the witnesses that discussed it are selected by the community to do what they believe is the best for the blockchain and what they did could have only taken place like this.

With my post, I am just stating my opinion. It differs from yours, which can happen. We have also agreed on things in the past. In this case, I don't believe in freezing anyone's account without any real justification.

Maybe my feelings stem from Dutch politics where there is always a middle ground and people talk with each other no matter what. I am not used to/fan of striking first, talk later.

👍 roelandp, tonyz

`post_id`	84,685,569
`author`	exyle
`permlink`	q67r3w
`category`	exyle
`json_metadata`	{"app":"steemit\/0.2"}
`created`	2020-02-24 15:59:57
`last_update`	2020-02-24 15:59:57
`depth`	6
`children`	5
`net_rshares`	1,399,897,898,065
`last_payout`	2020-03-02 15:59:57
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.126 SBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.126 SBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 SBD
`promoted`	0.000 SBD
`body_length`	758
`author_reputation`	1,230,268,770,812,381
`root_title`	"Vlog 459: A sad day for Steem"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 SBD
`percent_steem_dollars`	10,000
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
roelandp	0 B		1,346,386,561,020	100%
tonyz	0 B		53,511,337,045	20%

5 replies