RE: Vlog 459: A sad day for Steem by exyle

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @broncnutz/q6901q

· @exyle ·
I can see both sides too. I can understand from their viewpoint the reasoning of why they went to these measures. I just don't agree with it at all. 

I think there was no treat but besides that, I think the buy was legit and he owns the tokens and therefore can do what he wants with it. 

I think the precedent that has been created that under certain circumstances accounts can be frozen is far more dangerous then blocking steem biggest investor from accessing his legitimate stake that he bought.
properties (22)
post_id84,719,206
authorexyle
permlinkq69q4i
categoryexyle
json_metadata{"app":"steemit\/0.2"}
created2020-02-25 17:33:54
last_update2020-02-25 17:33:54
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2020-03-03 17:33:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length501
author_reputation1,230,268,770,812,381
root_title"Vlog 459: A sad day for Steem"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000