Viewing a response to: @felixxx/re-isnochys-re-felixxx-more-n-2-20180216t102100090z
Can you point me to the right formula? Your last article: https://steemit.com/non-linear/@felixxx/why-n-2 > If you were to use your vote on a post with already a bunch of r_shares, then upvoting that post would allow you to allocate much more rewards than if another account with 2x as much Steem Power voted on a different post with no other votes to stack on to. Is not that clear, how exactly that would happen. Also, who would discover new content? Apperently, right now a lot of users already vote on the same face again and again, because there is already a bunch of votes on. With n^2 this would increase, I guess. Why 'waste' my vote on that nice poem, when I can get way more curator rewards back, by voting on that daily trending?
| post_id | 33,033,420 |
|---|---|
| author | isnochys |
| permlink | re-felixxx-re-isnochys-re-felixxx-more-n-2-20180216t103024629z |
| category | non-linear |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "links": ["https://steemit.com/non-linear/@felixxx/why-n-2"], "tags": ["non-linear"]}" |
| created | 2018-02-16 10:30:24 |
| last_update | 2018-02-16 10:30:24 |
| depth | 3 |
| children | 1 |
| net_rshares | 729,477,765 |
| last_payout | 2018-02-23 10:30:24 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 744 |
| author_reputation | 36,963,899,244,133 |
| root_title | "More n^2" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |
| author_curate_reward | "" |
| voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| fuchsfalke | 0 | 729,477,765 | 100% |
The actual payout would depend on where all the other r_shares were allocated to. If the highest paying post had 2x as many r_shares as the second highest, the latter would get 1/4 of the rewards of the first one. >Why 'waste' my vote on that nice poem, when I can get way more curator rewards back, by voting on that daily trending? Because with n^2 there is at least a chance that the majority of stakeholders will find a consensus of what 'good content' is and maybe one day they all agree that it is a nice poem and it will go viral and end up in trending.
| post_id | 33,034,643 |
|---|---|
| author | felixxx |
| permlink | re-isnochys-re-felixxx-re-isnochys-re-felixxx-more-n-2-20180216t103748287z |
| category | non-linear |
| json_metadata | "{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["non-linear"]}" |
| created | 2018-02-16 10:37:48 |
| last_update | 2018-02-16 10:37:48 |
| depth | 4 |
| children | 0 |
| net_rshares | 0 |
| last_payout | 2018-02-23 10:37:48 |
| cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
| total_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| curator_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| pending_payout_value | 0.000 SBD |
| promoted | 0.000 SBD |
| body_length | 563 |
| author_reputation | 66,238,594,869,311 |
| root_title | "More n^2" |
| beneficiaries | [] |
| max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 SBD |
| percent_steem_dollars | 10,000 |