create account

[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features by clayop

View this thread on steemit.com
· @clayop · (edited)
[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features
This is time to show your opinions on HF17!
Vote any if you like, and downvote any if you don't like to see. (Upvote = agree) All comments decline payout.

1. Remove Posting Rate Limit
2. The comment depth limit has been increased to 255
3. Comments can now be permanently edited
4. Comments are now paid out independent of their discussion
5. All comments are paid out 7 days after creation and there is no longer a second payout window
6. There is now a comment reward fund separate from posts
7. All payouts now look at the prior 30 days of payouts to determine the share of the reward rather than the current pending rshares
8. Reward Balance
9. Comment Reward Beneficiaries
10. Delegated Steem Power
11. Accounts can be created with a smaller fee and an initial Steem Power delegation
12. PoW is being removed

Any discussions are more than welcome!
If you are hard to find options, sort comments by *age*

Add: Ypu can choose MULTIPLE items.
Items are from @liondani's [post](https://steemit.com/steem/@liondani/transparency-witnesses-opinions-on-hard-fork-17-futures)

![](http://www.publicdomainpictures.net/pictures/50000/velka/raised-hands.jpg)
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 112 others
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
post_id2,203,261
authorclayop
permlinkpoll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"format": "markdown", "links": ["https://steemit.com/steem/@liondani/transparency-witnesses-opinions-on-hard-fork-17-futures"], "app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll", "steemit"], "users": ["liondani"], "image": ["http://www.publicdomainpictures.net/pictures/50000/velka/raised-hands.jpg"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:30:21
last_update2017-03-21 00:05:36
depth0
children228
net_rshares27,411,123,232,793
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,154
author_reputation245,470,891,568,503
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout0.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (177)
@clayop ·
properties (23)
post_id2,203,275
authorclayop
permlinkre-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-01
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"format": "markdown", "tags": ["poll", "steemit"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:32:48
last_update2017-03-20 23:32:48
depth1
children23
net_rshares19,498,844,327,021
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length32
author_reputation245,470,891,568,503
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout0.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (67)
@leesunmoo ·
(I misunderstood the parent's writing) .... I want to see it all ... Is there a way to cancel the upvote in the comment?
properties (22)
post_id2,203,500
authorleesunmoo
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-01-20170320t235955424z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:59:54
last_update2017-03-20 23:59:54
depth2
children1
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length120
author_reputation176,920,345,078,243
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@businesswri ·
Click on upvote again, and you will see an option to remove your vote
properties (22)
post_id2,210,275
authorbusinesswri
permlinkre-leesunmoo-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-01-20170321t170251118z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 17:02:48
last_update2017-03-21 17:02:48
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length69
author_reputation16,343,058,427,231
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@fubar-bdhr ·
$0.19
Don't like just removing it.  I think it should be based on rep.  This would allow established members to post more while keeping spam down from people just doing copy/paste fishing for votes.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,204,130
authorfubar-bdhr
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-01-20170321t013912099z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 01:39:12
last_update2017-03-21 01:39:12
depth2
children6
net_rshares306,695,575,383
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.140 SBD
curator_payout_value0.045 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length192
author_reputation61,031,712,426,864
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (9)
@jesta ·
That might be a good next step - but I think removing it and seeing what happens might be a first good step!
properties (22)
post_id2,205,106
authorjesta
permlinkre-fubar-bdhr-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-01-20170321t044046098z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 04:40:45
last_update2017-03-21 04:40:45
depth3
children3
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length108
author_reputation140,173,741,834,676
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@proskynneo ·
$0.07
Reputation is not a consensus level feature of the blockchain. Meaning it is derived from state, but does not impact state. We have no plans on making it consensus. There were bugs in the bandwidth rate limiting algorithm that have since been fixed. Normal use should not be affected, but spamming most definitely will.
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,208,568
authorproskynneo
permlinkre-fubar-bdhr-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-01-20170321t135106710z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 13:51:06
last_update2017-03-21 13:51:06
depth3
children0
net_rshares121,203,331,334
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.051 SBD
curator_payout_value0.017 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length319
author_reputation4,455,422,450,444
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@businesswri · (edited)
Good idea @fubar-bdhr. More rep = the more you can post
properties (22)
post_id2,210,208
authorbusinesswri
permlinkre-fubar-bdhr-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-01-20170321t165512866z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["fubar-bdhr"], "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 16:55:09
last_update2017-03-21 16:56:45
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length55
author_reputation16,343,058,427,231
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@snowflake · (edited)
$0.17
I'm against this. Recently I've seen some users post 40 times a day and make $2( mostly autovote) on every post, without the posting rate limit these users would make $80 a day for posting very average content with no effort.If everyone start doing this the site will be full of garbage stuff.  The limit encourages users to write quality content.
I would agree with extending it a bit ( 5-10 posts) but not removing it entirely.

edit: This feature should be called "remove earning limit" as it does not restrict people from posting.
πŸ‘  , , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,204,945
authorsnowflake
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-01-20170321t040918171z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 04:09:18
last_update2017-03-21 05:15:09
depth2
children5
net_rshares279,649,690,152
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.126 SBD
curator_payout_value0.041 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length534
author_reputation33,282,981,394,546
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (6)
@businesswri ·
$0.05
I think the post limit should be based on Rep
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,210,238
authorbusinesswri
permlinkre-snowflake-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-01-20170321t165759824z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 16:57:57
last_update2017-03-21 16:57:57
depth3
children0
net_rshares81,200,188,269
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.034 SBD
curator_payout_value0.011 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length45
author_reputation16,343,058,427,231
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@timcliff ·
$0.04
The main justification for it is that the current model works well for 'blogging' but it is not very well suited for twitter type content. The idea is to put the burden of allocating rewards properly on the community / voters. In theory, if someone is posting a lot of crap posts and getting constantly upvoted - users should be able to detect that and downvote.
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,214,021
authortimcliff
permlinkre-snowflake-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-01-20170322t001611723z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-22 00:16:09
last_update2017-03-22 00:16:09
depth3
children2
net_rshares75,166,898,877
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.031 SBD
curator_payout_value0.010 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length362
author_reputation247,995,867,762,997
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@bnoise ·
This is a bot problem and/or autovote problem, not a posting limit problem.
There are good ways to do more than 4 posts / days, as timcliff say.
properties (22)
post_id2,234,421
authorbnoise
permlinkre-snowflake-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-01-20170324t053747127z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-24 05:37:45
last_update2017-03-24 05:37:45
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length144
author_reputation1,833,721,315,508
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@craig-grant · (edited)
$0.19
the hardfork removes the 4 per day post limit from the protocol level, but steemit.com web site can implement UI upgrades to deal with spam and users who abuse no posting limit, the goal of hf17 is to simplify what happens on the blockchain, making it run more efficient, and put the complicated solutions on the web site
πŸ‘  , , , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,205,329
authorcraig-grant
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-01-20170321t052732611z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 05:27:33
last_update2017-03-21 05:28:18
depth2
children0
net_rshares311,535,259,760
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.173 SBD
curator_payout_value0.014 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length321
author_reputation437,634,056,353,838
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (7)
@jaki01 ·
I fear that some users could feel the "pressure" to produce as many as possible articles (to earn as much as possible) so that the quality of the articles may decrease. We may see even more "one-image-posts" with very short texts ...
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
post_id2,206,962
authorjaki01
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-01-20170321t103855581z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 10:38:54
last_update2017-03-21 10:38:54
depth2
children0
net_rshares2,296,817,347
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length233
author_reputation196,990,119,859,098
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@shortcut ·
How about paying a small fee (aka 'need of promotion') for every post above a certain limit instead? Let's say, every user has one or two posts free per day and after that needs to promote the post.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,207,028
authorshortcut
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-01-20170321t104850102z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 10:48:48
last_update2017-03-21 10:48:48
depth2
children1
net_rshares641,814,873
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length198
author_reputation120,534,427,956,805
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@uwelang ·
$0.03
Great idea to me @shortcut - I would be in for that!
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
post_id2,217,570
authoruwelang
permlinkre-shortcut-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-01-20170321t104850102z-2017322t114847935z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "esteem/1.4.0", "format": "markdown+html", "tags": "poll"}"
created2017-03-22 10:48:51
last_update2017-03-22 10:48:51
depth3
children0
net_rshares59,273,922,190
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.025 SBD
curator_payout_value0.008 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length52
author_reputation280,399,850,522,379
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@sardrt ·
$0.02
Absolutely contrary. You will see a lot of junk among the topics
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
post_id2,207,244
authorsardrt
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-01-20170321t111828020z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 11:21:06
last_update2017-03-21 11:21:06
depth2
children0
net_rshares42,921,406,764
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.017 SBD
curator_payout_value0.005 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length64
author_reputation241,731,548,080,410
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@cryptoctopus ·
$0.03
In a situation where on certain apps people would post frequently(like instagram) i believe it would be preferable to remove this limit.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
post_id2,207,245
authorcryptoctopus
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-01-20170321t112129075z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 11:21:30
last_update2017-03-21 11:21:30
depth2
children1
net_rshares53,660,027,400
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.022 SBD
curator_payout_value0.007 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length136
author_reputation356,633,571,001,204
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@businesswri · (edited)
Agreed, for scalability, no post limit is a must or make the post limit based on Rep.
properties (22)
post_id2,210,264
authorbusinesswri
permlinkre-cryptoctopus-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-01-20170321t170122100z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 17:01:18
last_update2017-03-21 17:01:54
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length85
author_reputation16,343,058,427,231
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@azfix ·
Not a fan of this at all, we have enough spam as it is
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,209,577
authorazfix
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-01-20170321t155124008z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 15:51:18
last_update2017-03-21 15:51:18
depth2
children0
net_rshares641,814,873
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length54
author_reputation27,122,725,793,320
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@clayop ·
properties (23)
post_id2,203,287
authorclayop
permlinkre-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-02
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"format": "markdown", "tags": ["poll", "steemit"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:33:45
last_update2017-03-20 23:33:45
depth1
children8
net_rshares20,611,519,954,519
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length56
author_reputation245,470,891,568,503
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout0.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (101)
@leesunmoo ·
(I misunderstood the parent's writing) .... I want to see it all ... Is there a way to cancel the upvote in the comment?
properties (22)
post_id2,203,490
authorleesunmoo
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-02-20170320t235855779z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:58:57
last_update2017-03-20 23:58:57
depth2
children1
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length120
author_reputation176,920,345,078,243
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@tibonova · (edited)
Yes, just click on the upvote again and your vote will be changed to 0 weight.

Edit: But what have you misunderstood? Upvoting the post does nothing with the comments. The comments what are count in this poll. For e.g. I UV the post to make it more visible, and will vote for the comments later (bookmarked).
properties (22)
post_id2,207,232
authortibonova
permlinkre-leesunmoo-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-02-20170321t111857020z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 11:18:57
last_update2017-03-21 11:24:03
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length309
author_reputation12,882,495,516,931
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@jaki01 ·
Very good idea!
properties (22)
post_id2,207,019
authorjaki01
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-02-20170321t104804454z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 10:48:03
last_update2017-03-21 10:48:03
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length15
author_reputation196,990,119,859,098
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@cryptoctopus ·
Love that one
properties (22)
post_id2,207,224
authorcryptoctopus
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-02-20170321t111645750z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 11:16:45
last_update2017-03-21 11:16:45
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length13
author_reputation356,633,571,001,204
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@tibonova ·
Comment depth limit now causes frustration, annoyance, and make hard to follow threads with the 'mention workaround'. If there isn't any enormous drawback (I don't know about any), it's an easy decision for me. I would accept this.
properties (22)
post_id2,207,649
authortibonova
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-02-20170321t121639945z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "busy/1.0.0", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 12:16:42
last_update2017-03-21 12:16:42
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length231
author_reputation12,882,495,516,931
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@clains ·
What does 255 mean?
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,208,369
authorclains
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-02-20170321t133134165z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 13:31:33
last_update2017-03-21 13:31:33
depth2
children2
net_rshares641,814,873
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length19
author_reputation64,071,761,886,755
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@leprechaun ·
It's 200+50+5 and 2<sup>8</sup>-1.  This number is special because it is the biggest number that can fit into a byte
properties (22)
post_id2,211,137
authorleprechaun
permlinkre-clains-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-02-20170321t182346075z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 18:23:54
last_update2017-03-21 18:23:54
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length116
author_reputation2,563,828,015,694
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@andu ·
nested comments can go up to 255 as opposed to 6 right now.
properties (22)
post_id2,211,210
authorandu
permlinkre-clains-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-02-20170321t183110798z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 18:31:30
last_update2017-03-21 18:31:30
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length59
author_reputation5,356,595,953,365
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@clayop ·
Feature 3
**3. Comments can now be permanently edited**
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 17 others
πŸ‘Ž  , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,203,294
authorclayop
permlinkre-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-03
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"format": "markdown", "tags": ["poll", "steemit"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:34:30
last_update2017-03-20 23:34:30
depth1
children6
net_rshares18,134,625,545,374
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length45
author_reputation245,470,891,568,503
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout0.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (84)
@fubar-bdhr ·
$0.09
This is the way it always should have been.  Of course it should be accompanied by an easy to use history feature to see every edit.
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,204,142
authorfubar-bdhr
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-03-20170321t014029456z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 01:40:30
last_update2017-03-21 01:40:30
depth2
children1
net_rshares147,081,008,039
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.064 SBD
curator_payout_value0.021 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length132
author_reputation61,031,712,426,864
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@azfix ·
Amen
properties (22)
post_id2,209,556
authorazfix
permlinkre-fubar-bdhr-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-03-20170321t154946830z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 15:49:42
last_update2017-03-21 15:49:42
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length4
author_reputation27,122,725,793,320
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@jaki01 ·
Actually I am rather often editing my comments and articles if I spot mistakes, but the problem with being able to do that permanently could be that if you answer in a discussion to a comment and later the comment will be changed, your answer doesn't suit to the comment anymore ... discussions could be falsified afterwards. I know, everthing is saved in the blockchain, but ... in practice it could be difficult for the normal user to verify everything.
properties (22)
post_id2,206,942
authorjaki01
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-03-20170321t103604855z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 10:36:03
last_update2017-03-21 10:36:03
depth2
children2
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length455
author_reputation196,990,119,859,098
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@tibonova ·
I think showing post history is the UI's duty. Also, I would start a brainstorming about votes, which is a harder problem. Imagine someone make a successful post, then editing it to be the opposite of the former one. The votes would still remain, showing many like the post, which were not true.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,207,978
authortibonova
permlinkre-jaki01-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-03-20170321t125355478z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "busy/1.0.0", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 12:53:57
last_update2017-03-21 12:53:57
depth3
children0
net_rshares26,346,400,928
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length295
author_reputation12,882,495,516,931
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@uwelang ·
I agree with @jaki01
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
post_id2,217,534
authoruwelang
permlinkre-jaki01-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-03-20170321t103604855z-2017322t114159139z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "esteem/1.4.0", "format": "markdown+html", "tags": "poll"}"
created2017-03-22 10:42:03
last_update2017-03-22 10:42:03
depth3
children0
net_rshares32,389,975,945
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length20
author_reputation280,399,850,522,379
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@tibonova ·
It's not just for correcting typos, errors, but good for avoiding legal actions (many times it's enough to delete contents that could be attacked legally). Since not everybody anon here (and not will be), I would allow editing a post without expiration. 
properties (22)
post_id2,207,921
authortibonova
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-03-20170321t124828218z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "busy/1.0.0", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 12:48:27
last_update2017-03-21 12:48:27
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length254
author_reputation12,882,495,516,931
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@clayop ·
properties (23)
post_id2,203,298
authorclayop
permlinkre-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-04
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"format": "markdown", "tags": ["poll", "steemit"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:34:54
last_update2017-03-20 23:34:54
depth1
children12
net_rshares17,168,374,644,582
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length76
author_reputation245,470,891,568,503
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout0.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (57)
@freebornangel ·
$0.07
Pays out in 4 hours?
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
post_id2,204,037
authorfreebornangel
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-04-20170321t012724359z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 01:27:24
last_update2017-03-21 01:27:24
depth2
children5
net_rshares119,569,842,112
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.051 SBD
curator_payout_value0.017 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length20
author_reputation75,857,757,502,918
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@jesta ·
It means each individual comment will have it's own individual payout cycle, much like each pays out on it's own cycle. Current I believe comments pay out when the original post pays out.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
post_id2,205,116
authorjesta
permlinkre-freebornangel-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-04-20170321t044204033z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 04:42:03
last_update2017-03-21 04:42:03
depth3
children4
net_rshares13,582,610,841
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length187
author_reputation140,173,741,834,676
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@sardrt ·
Why now it is that it works as payment for comments?
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,207,291
authorsardrt
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-04-20170321t112544759z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 11:28:24
last_update2017-03-21 11:28:24
depth2
children0
net_rshares641,814,873
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length52
author_reputation241,731,548,080,410
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@azfix ·
I don't see the point in this, other than maybe to slow the the amount of steem given out daily
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,209,596
authorazfix
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-04-20170321t155338594z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 15:53:33
last_update2017-03-21 15:53:33
depth2
children2
net_rshares641,814,873
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length95
author_reputation27,122,725,793,320
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@businesswri ·
Agreed
properties (22)
post_id2,210,288
authorbusinesswri
permlinkre-azfix-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-04-20170321t170447426z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 17:04:45
last_update2017-03-21 17:04:45
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length6
author_reputation16,343,058,427,231
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@timcliff ·
$0.03
The amount of STEEM given out via the rewards pool will not change.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
post_id2,214,035
authortimcliff
permlinkre-azfix-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-04-20170322t001805533z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-22 00:18:03
last_update2017-03-22 00:18:03
depth3
children0
net_rshares60,946,303,773
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.019 SBD
curator_payout_value0.006 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length67
author_reputation247,995,867,762,997
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@robrigo ·
This has my vote because it improves the incentives for continued discussion on a post.
properties (22)
post_id2,213,970
authorrobrigo
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-04-20170322t000559280z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-22 00:05:57
last_update2017-03-22 00:05:57
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length87
author_reputation36,030,199,486,678
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@timcliff ·
$0.11
The main reason for this change is so that comments have an equal opportunity to collect rewards. With the current implementation, if there is 5 minutes left on the parent post's payout window and someone makes a great comment - it only has 5 minutes to collect upvotes/rewards. The change will allow it to have its own countdown clock, which starts when the comment is created. Seems like a no-brainer 'yes' :)
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,214,043
authortimcliff
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-04-20170322t001941341z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-22 00:19:39
last_update2017-03-22 00:19:39
depth2
children0
net_rshares186,158,807,417
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.104 SBD
curator_payout_value0.003 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length411
author_reputation247,995,867,762,997
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@clayop ·
Feature 5
**5. All comments are paid out 7 days after creation and there is no longer a second payout window**
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , ,
πŸ‘Ž  , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,203,299
authorclayop
permlinkre-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"format": "markdown", "tags": ["poll", "steemit"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:35:18
last_update2017-03-20 23:35:18
depth1
children44
net_rshares-10,010,594,494,786
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length100
author_reputation245,470,891,568,503
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout0.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (24)
@cassidyandfranks ·
Does not bother or effect me at the moment.
properties (22)
post_id2,203,467
authorcassidyandfranks
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170320t235457359z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:55:00
last_update2017-03-20 23:55:00
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length43
author_reputation13,386,488,420,699
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@blocktrades ·
$2.39
I think to make this vote, more details about this point need to be made. Specifically, the description should be extended to read: "and the payout extension period to prevent voting abuse will be removed". AFAIK, this is the main objection to this point, not the part mentioned above.
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,203,718
authorblocktrades
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170321t003609523z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 00:36:06
last_update2017-03-21 00:36:06
depth2
children1
net_rshares2,576,595,858,712
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value2.169 SBD
curator_payout_value0.224 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length285
author_reputation212,705,038,647,813
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@fyrstikken ·
$4.34
Payout every day is what makes it fun to post every day. I think this 7 days needs to be split up into day1 payout and day7 payout - it can still use the same curve - just delete the difference that has already been paid out on day 1 when the day 7 payout comes and we will have a brilliant solution.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,215,425
authorfyrstikken
permlinkre-blocktrades-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170322t034434941z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-22 03:44:42
last_update2017-03-22 03:44:42
depth3
children0
net_rshares3,890,341,739,063
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value3.254 SBD
curator_payout_value1.084 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length300
author_reputation352,100,520,168,452
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@liondani ·
I think it would be better that the current  
24h.+1month gets >>>>  24h.+*1week*  
(2 payout windows just 1month>>>1week)
properties (22)
post_id2,203,788
authorliondani
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170321t005133648z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 00:51:33
last_update2017-03-21 00:51:33
depth2
children1
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length122
author_reputation76,246,905,464,437
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@liondani ·
What @jesta says makes much more sense!
https://steemit.com/poll/@clayop/poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features#@jesta/re-fubar-bdhr-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170321t045108674z
properties (22)
post_id2,213,637
authorliondani
permlinkre-liondani-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170321t230900899z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["jesta"], "links": ["https://steemit.com/poll/@clayop/poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features#@jesta/re-fubar-bdhr-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170321t045108674z"], "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 23:09:03
last_update2017-03-21 23:09:03
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length215
author_reputation76,246,905,464,437
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@fubar-bdhr ·
$1.72
Posts should always be eligible for payout.  Window really doesn't seem to matter much.  Most posts are voted on withing the first hour with the exception of really active ones or ones that have made it to the front of trending  There is no reason new people coming in and voting on old content should not be allowed or even discouraged.
πŸ‘  , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,204,178
authorfubar-bdhr
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170321t014500783z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 01:45:03
last_update2017-03-21 01:45:03
depth2
children19
net_rshares2,024,346,500,094
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.292 SBD
curator_payout_value0.430 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length337
author_reputation61,031,712,426,864
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@jesta ·
$5.47
I brought that up during recent discussions as well - I think having unlimited, repeating payout cycles for posts makes a lot of sense. If I write a technical article about how to build a website, the first week it might earn $10, but it remains valuable and should be able to start a new payout cycle whenever more people start voting on it weeks or months into the future. 

An additional idea thrown out by someone (sorry, don't remember who) would also include that the account has to have  enough weight for a payout (0.02) to start a new payout cycle. 

There may be some avenues for abuse with this approach - but nothing you can't do already just by creating new posts everyday. If anything, by having a single payout window, we're encouraging people to repost the same content over and over on the blockchain.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,205,164
authorjesta
permlinkre-fubar-bdhr-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170321t045108674z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 04:51:09
last_update2017-03-21 04:51:09
depth3
children17
net_rshares4,534,070,315,100
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value4.102 SBD
curator_payout_value1.366 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length818
author_reputation140,173,741,834,676
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (8)
@azfix ·
Spot on here, I couldn't have said it better myself!
properties (22)
post_id2,209,653
authorazfix
permlinkre-fubar-bdhr-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170321t155942702z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 15:59:36
last_update2017-03-21 15:59:36
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length52
author_reputation27,122,725,793,320
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@donkeypong ·
Not my favorite feature, but I support this because I think it will make external promotion possible. People will promote their posts outside of Steemit and that should help bring more people here. We need to look beyond Steemit's details and see the larger picture.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
post_id2,205,019
authordonkeypong
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170321t042417613z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 04:24:27
last_update2017-03-21 04:24:27
depth2
children8
net_rshares2,609,885,092
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length266
author_reputation430,967,424,524,957
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@jesta ·
$0.23
Another way to make external promotion (and longer term) would be repeatable payout cycles on a single post. You're right, this does help it, but making content viable forever would have a much larger impact.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,205,181
authorjesta
permlinkre-donkeypong-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170321t045623892z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 04:56:24
last_update2017-03-21 04:56:24
depth3
children2
net_rshares371,055,105,533
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.171 SBD
curator_payout_value0.057 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length208
author_reputation140,173,741,834,676
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@sardrt ·
I agree .. It should be possible to reward those who bring out Steem. Have you thought about this thing ??
properties (22)
post_id2,207,387
authorsardrt
permlinkre-donkeypong-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170321t113912720z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 11:41:51
last_update2017-03-21 11:41:51
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length106
author_reputation241,731,548,080,410
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@clains ·
$2.63
How about this idea: OP gets a fraction of the payout of the comments. Then starting a huge discussion would be profitable.
πŸ‘  , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,208,408
authorclains
permlinkre-donkeypong-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170321t133516264z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 13:35:15
last_update2017-03-21 13:35:15
depth3
children3
net_rshares2,754,580,539,058
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.972 SBD
curator_payout_value0.656 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length123
author_reputation64,071,761,886,755
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@jaki01 ·
I like it to find great somewhat older articles sometimes and are still able to reward the author ... But maybe the long time span has some disadvantages I am just not aware of?
properties (22)
post_id2,206,897
authorjaki01
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170321t102726342z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 10:27:27
last_update2017-03-21 10:27:27
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length177
author_reputation196,990,119,859,098
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@beanz ·
I would vote yes to this *if* the period was still extendable to avoid last minute whale (or bot) votes.  I also think it could be shorter, perhaps from 5-7 days.

Bloggers don't expect all their readers to read in the first 2 days, so I agree that the window for receiving rewards should be wider.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,207,296
authorbeanz
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170321t112830540z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 11:28:33
last_update2017-03-21 11:28:33
depth2
children0
net_rshares4,798,850,304
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length298
author_reputation68,303,733,730,210
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@cryptoctopus ·
$0.32
This should be an arbitrary variable depending on the app. This feature may box STEEM into a certain type of platform. The current behavior is only gathered from 1 UIX.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,207,302
authorcryptoctopus
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170321t112909780z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 11:29:12
last_update2017-03-21 11:29:12
depth2
children1
net_rshares499,858,407,251
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.238 SBD
curator_payout_value0.079 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length168
author_reputation356,633,571,001,204
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@smooth ·
I agree what I would like to see is a short default lifetime with the ability of the poster or app to extend the time by paying a fee or using more bandwidth allowance. If you can post one every seven days for a month,  you should be able to make one post and have it stay active for a month. The cost to the system for the latter is actually _lower_ yet the current (and proposed) rules only allow the former.
properties (22)
post_id2,215,505
authorsmooth
permlinkre-cryptoctopus-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170322t035702500z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-22 03:57:00
last_update2017-03-22 03:57:00
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length410
author_reputation83,817,235,636,416
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@shadowspub ·
is this applied to just comments as stated or posts too?
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,208,335
authorshadowspub
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170321t132843107z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 13:28:45
last_update2017-03-21 13:28:45
depth2
children2
net_rshares18,105,465,194
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length56
author_reputation80,455,466,172,351
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@blocktrades ·
$0.02
It applies to posts and comments.
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,210,309
authorblocktrades
permlinkre-shadowspub-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170321t170618600z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 17:06:18
last_update2017-03-21 17:06:18
depth3
children1
net_rshares35,979,856,285
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.015 SBD
curator_payout_value0.004 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length33
author_reputation212,705,038,647,813
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@robrigo · (edited)
$0.22
I think the devs should take @jesta's suggestion into consideration. Having a continuous payout cycle is a powerful idea. That being said, I think the shorter term payout is a "sticky" feature that brings people back to the site. 24 hours is closer to "instant" gratification than 7 days. In 7 days, someone might not even remember to come back and check out how their post is doing. But if you are providing a shorter term payment window (24 hours), I think it is more likely to stay on their mind.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,214,026
authorrobrigo
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170322t001639600z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["jesta"], "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-22 00:16:39
last_update2017-03-22 00:16:51
depth2
children2
net_rshares358,712,585,872
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.164 SBD
curator_payout_value0.055 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length499
author_reputation36,030,199,486,678
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@businesswri ·
24 hour payout window makes Steemit much more exciting
properties (22)
post_id2,214,864
authorbusinesswri
permlinkre-robrigo-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170322t021716188z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-22 02:17:12
last_update2017-03-22 02:17:12
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length54
author_reputation16,343,058,427,231
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@sneak · (edited)
$0.07
Having a continuous payout cycle is also a good way to require an unbounded amount of memory to run `steemd`.  There are engineering trade-offs here which we dive deeply on.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
post_id2,218,344
authorsneak
permlinkre-robrigo-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-05-20170322t125632313z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-22 12:54:42
last_update2017-03-22 12:55:15
depth3
children0
net_rshares477,719,286,496
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.065 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length173
author_reputation26,370,059,584,861
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@clayop ·
properties (23)
post_id2,203,305
authorclayop
permlinkre-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-06
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"format": "markdown", "tags": ["poll", "steemit"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:35:54
last_update2017-03-20 23:35:54
depth1
children23
net_rshares4,516,810,703,463
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length61
author_reputation245,470,891,568,503
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout0.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (49)
@leesunmoo ·
(I misunderstood the parent's writing) .... I want to see it all ... Is there a way to cancel the upvote in the comment?
properties (22)
post_id2,203,488
authorleesunmoo
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-06-20170320t235740268z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:57:39
last_update2017-03-20 23:57:39
depth2
children1
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length120
author_reputation176,920,345,078,243
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@abit ·
Click it again to cancel, or click the "flag" on the right side to change it to a downvote.
properties (22)
post_id2,203,715
authorabit
permlinkre-leesunmoo-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-06-20170321t003448780z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 00:36:00
last_update2017-03-21 00:36:00
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length91
author_reputation94,285,399,254,807
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@blocktrades · (edited)
$4.53
My reservation about this feature is a problem most people will have never seen, but nowadays, with bots voting on most posts, there is already a significant incentive for whales to vote on comments instead of posts to gain more curation rewards. My regular curator noticed this and pointed it out to me, but I didn't feel it was a good idea to vote mostly on comments just to game the reward system. But with this further tilt of the incentives, I feel it's likely that this feature will lead to abuse that has not been anticipated. I would rather delay this feature until the reward curve has been adjusted to reduce this potential abuse.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,203,768
authorblocktrades
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-06-20170321t004628695z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 00:46:27
last_update2017-03-21 00:46:57
depth2
children16
net_rshares4,006,082,090,056
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value3.999 SBD
curator_payout_value0.533 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length640
author_reputation212,705,038,647,813
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (26)
@freebornangel ·
We need @steemcleaners or @cheetah to unmask the cheeters/gamers that endanger the game, imo.
properties (22)
post_id2,204,014
authorfreebornangel
permlinkre-blocktrades-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-06-20170321t012429820z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["steemcleaners", "cheetah"], "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 01:24:33
last_update2017-03-21 01:24:33
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length93
author_reputation75,857,757,502,918
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@timcliff ·
$1.09
If you were already interested in voting on comments before the change, I'd say go for it! I think the whole reason that the change was proposed in the first place was because users/whales were not voting on comments enough. If more people did it, it would remove the need for the change (IMO).
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,204,132
authortimcliff
permlinkre-blocktrades-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-06-20170321t013921982z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 01:39:18
last_update2017-03-21 01:39:18
depth3
children6
net_rshares1,428,039,879,880
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.924 SBD
curator_payout_value0.170 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length294
author_reputation247,995,867,762,997
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@beanz ·
It had been anticipated that's why it was proposed it would be without curation rewards.  I would love to see a reward pool for comments only, no curation rewards, because that would create a lot of reason for non bloggers to be here, and they will attract real investors.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,207,252
authorbeanz
permlinkre-blocktrades-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-06-20170321t112218662z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 11:22:21
last_update2017-03-21 11:22:21
depth3
children6
net_rshares4,798,850,304
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length272
author_reputation68,303,733,730,210
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@sneak ·
$0.66
The feature has already been implemented and tested, and we'd like to move on immediately to the reward curve in 18.  If it's abused, we will see such soon, and address it quickly in 18 or 19 (or via other means).

Fear of minor abuses of rewards allocation isn't something to worry about; we're doing regular hardforks and if there is a serious problem with any change, it will be reverted or improved quickly.  The point of the comment rewards pool is to directly address one of our community's biggest existential threats: our retention rate for new users.  It's a lot easier to comment than to write a new post, and by ensuring that users who only comment can also earn meaningful rewards should improve that a lot.
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,218,218
authorsneak
permlinkre-blocktrades-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-06-20170322t124137509z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-22 12:39:48
last_update2017-03-22 12:39:48
depth3
children0
net_rshares1,243,532,254,076
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.504 SBD
curator_payout_value0.152 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length719
author_reputation26,370,059,584,861
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@fubar-bdhr ·
$0.91
Do not like this one as is.  I think with the new comment depth (the existing one discouraged me from even commenting most time) along with the possible changing of the reward curve need to be studied more first.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
post_id2,204,119
authorfubar-bdhr
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-06-20170321t013707004z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 01:37:09
last_update2017-03-21 01:37:09
depth2
children0
net_rshares1,237,052,524,109
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.686 SBD
curator_payout_value0.228 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length212
author_reputation61,031,712,426,864
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@craig-grant ·
$0.78
best thing about this feature is potentially taking away 38% of the reward pool from bots, as it would be hard for bots to effectively vote on comments
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,205,358
authorcraig-grant
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-06-20170321t053444521z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 05:34:45
last_update2017-03-21 05:34:45
depth2
children0
net_rshares1,083,889,805,504
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.764 SBD
curator_payout_value0.013 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length151
author_reputation437,634,056,353,838
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@biophil ·
$1.77
I think this is the most absurd change in hf17. It's far too micro-managey to me; it's way more likely to create perverse incentives and unintended consequences than to help solve a problem. A problem, imo, that doesn't really exist.
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,210,053
authorbiophil
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-06-20170321t164114930z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 16:41:18
last_update2017-03-21 16:41:18
depth2
children1
net_rshares2,062,648,298,304
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.326 SBD
curator_payout_value0.440 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length233
author_reputation45,243,433,466,167
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (12)
@sneak ·
Retention of new users is absolutely a problem, and a looming existential one, at that.

This is, in my opinion, one of the two most important features in this release.
properties (22)
post_id2,218,246
authorsneak
permlinkre-biophil-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-06-20170322t124505767z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-22 12:43:12
last_update2017-03-22 12:43:12
depth3
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length168
author_reputation26,370,059,584,861
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@clayop ·
Feature 7
**7. All payouts now look at the prior 30 days of payouts to determine the share of the reward rather than the current pending rshares**
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
πŸ‘Ž  , , , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,203,309
authorclayop
permlinkre-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-07
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"format": "markdown", "tags": ["poll", "steemit"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:36:15
last_update2017-03-20 23:36:15
depth1
children6
net_rshares4,943,897,850,669
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length136
author_reputation245,470,891,568,503
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout0.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (40)
@cassidyandfranks ·
Does not bother or effect me at the moment.
properties (22)
post_id2,203,473
authorcassidyandfranks
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-07-20170320t235534951z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:55:39
last_update2017-03-20 23:55:39
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length43
author_reputation13,386,488,420,699
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@revostrike ·
I'm not really sure about this one. Can somebody please explain?
properties (22)
post_id2,206,133
authorrevostrike
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-07-20170321t083100786z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 07:59:09
last_update2017-03-21 07:59:09
depth2
children4
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length64
author_reputation12,525,001,246,993
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@proskynneo ·
The current algorithm looks at all posts and gives each one their fair share as if every post were to get paid out right now. i.e. If your post has 1% of rshares2, you get 1% of the reward fund.

The new algorithm looks at past posts and pays out based on previous claims to the reward fund. i.e. If your post has 1 million rshares on it and a post was paid out an hour ago (that also had 1 million rshares) got paid 10 STEEM, you could expect to be paid around 10 STEEM.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,208,682
authorproskynneo
permlinkre-revostrike-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-07-20170321t140451781z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 14:04:51
last_update2017-03-21 14:04:51
depth3
children3
net_rshares1,597,980,011
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length471
author_reputation4,455,422,450,444
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@clayop ·
properties (23)
post_id2,203,314
authorclayop
permlinkre-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-08
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"format": "markdown", "tags": ["poll", "steemit"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:36:36
last_update2017-03-20 23:36:36
depth1
children17
net_rshares11,781,624,747,395
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length21
author_reputation245,470,891,568,503
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout0.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (27)
@freebornangel ·
$0.07
Not enough information.
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,204,048
authorfreebornangel
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-08-20170321t012832095z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 01:28:39
last_update2017-03-21 01:28:39
depth2
children12
net_rshares127,773,685,583
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.055 SBD
curator_payout_value0.018 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length23
author_reputation75,857,757,502,918
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@rigaronib ·
$0.24
Agreed. I still have no idea what the hell this means.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,204,387
authorrigaronib
permlinkre-freebornangel-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-08-20170321t022538936z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 02:24:42
last_update2017-03-21 02:24:42
depth3
children1
net_rshares1,455,923,730,525
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.244 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length54
author_reputation171,571,221,978,359
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@jesta ·
$0.02
There will be a new rewards balance on each account, much like your normal balance and savings balance. So 3x "balances" for each liquid currency. 

All rewards will be deposited into this new rewards balance, which will then have to be withdrawn in order to transfer. 

The reason behind this change I've been told is for scalability, though I'm not 100% sure how changing which balance it goes into accomplishes that.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,205,134
authorjesta
permlinkre-freebornangel-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-08-20170321t044520901z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 04:45:21
last_update2017-03-21 04:45:21
depth3
children7
net_rshares40,783,240,405
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.017 SBD
curator_payout_value0.005 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length419
author_reputation140,173,741,834,676
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@ebryans ·
I won the whale vote contest - watch out! Good things coming!
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
post_id2,205,317
authorebryans
permlinkre-freebornangel-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-08-20170321t052523931z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 05:25:24
last_update2017-03-21 05:25:24
depth3
children1
net_rshares12,572,027,256
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length61
author_reputation40,947,012,609,239
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@onthewayout ·
Too many balances will confuse users IMO
properties (22)
post_id2,205,343
authoronthewayout
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-08-20170321t053021463z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 05:30:24
last_update2017-03-21 05:30:24
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length40
author_reputation5,011,872,336,272
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@sardrt ·
In fact ... you have to simplify. Steemit is already too complex and this complexity keeps out a lot of people .. The other company that pay (even very little), however, are very simple to understand ... I will actually ask an effort to simplify all the things ...
properties (22)
post_id2,207,346
authorsardrt
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-08-20170321t113244851z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 11:35:24
last_update2017-03-21 11:35:24
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length264
author_reputation241,731,548,080,410
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@azfix ·
No, not clear why they are doing it
properties (22)
post_id2,209,622
authorazfix
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-08-20170321t155628050z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 15:56:24
last_update2017-03-21 15:56:24
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length35
author_reputation27,122,725,793,320
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@robrigo ·
$0.26
I believe this is a requirement for the multi-chain parallelism a.k.a "Fabric" they are working on. Therefore it has my vote. I defer to the blockchain devs on this one.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
post_id2,213,995
authorrobrigo
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-08-20170322t001044409z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-22 00:10:45
last_update2017-03-22 00:10:45
depth2
children0
net_rshares411,838,345,938
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.252 SBD
curator_payout_value0.003 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length169
author_reputation36,030,199,486,678
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@clayop ·
properties (23)
post_id2,203,317
authorclayop
permlinkre-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-09
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"format": "markdown", "tags": ["poll", "steemit"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:37:00
last_update2017-03-20 23:37:00
depth1
children1
net_rshares19,713,505,654,320
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length35
author_reputation245,470,891,568,503
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout0.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (83)
@tibonova ·
$0.07
If we want (and I want) 3rd parties to use Steem like Disqus, and want developers build great apps, I think this feature is a must. We should provide incentives for growth, and this is a simple and fair way.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
post_id2,207,857
authortibonova
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-09-20170321t124135492z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "busy/1.0.0", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 12:41:36
last_update2017-03-21 12:41:36
depth2
children0
net_rshares119,569,449,225
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.051 SBD
curator_payout_value0.017 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length207
author_reputation12,882,495,516,931
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@clayop ·
properties (23)
post_id2,203,320
authorclayop
permlinkre-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-10
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"format": "markdown", "tags": ["poll", "steemit"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:37:24
last_update2017-03-20 23:37:24
depth1
children13
net_rshares20,423,361,109,520
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length29
author_reputation245,470,891,568,503
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout0.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (77)
@leesunmoo ·
(I misunderstood the parent's writing) .... I want to see it all ... Is there a way to cancel the upvote in the comment?
properties (22)
post_id2,203,479
authorleesunmoo
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-10-20170320t235651216z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:56:51
last_update2017-03-20 23:56:51
depth2
children1
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length120
author_reputation176,920,345,078,243
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@freebornangel ·
you should be able to reverse it just like you made it,....
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
post_id2,204,018
authorfreebornangel
permlinkre-leesunmoo-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-10-20170321t012513120z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 01:25:15
last_update2017-03-21 01:25:15
depth3
children0
net_rshares28,849,257,819
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length59
author_reputation75,857,757,502,918
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@coloured-content ·
Im sorry....what does delegated sp mean exactly? Does this mean we can **give away** SP ?
properties (22)
post_id2,205,048
authorcoloured-content
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-10-20170321t043023975z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 04:30:18
last_update2017-03-21 04:30:18
depth2
children9
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length89
author_reputation32,775,970,160,151
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@jesta ·
It means you can "lend" someone else SP. 

I could delegate 1000 SP to you and then you could use it to vote and earn curation rewards.

Currently the lender see's no benefits in the existing implementation.
properties (22)
post_id2,205,168
authorjesta
permlinkre-coloured-content-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-10-20170321t045219081z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 04:52:18
last_update2017-03-21 04:52:18
depth3
children8
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length207
author_reputation140,173,741,834,676
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@azfix ·
This will be interesting to see, I think its a good thing but I can imagine ways it could be abused.
properties (22)
post_id2,209,544
authorazfix
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-10-20170321t154845246z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 15:48:42
last_update2017-03-21 15:48:42
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length100
author_reputation27,122,725,793,320
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@clayop ·
properties (23)
post_id2,203,324
authorclayop
permlinkre-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-11
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"format": "markdown", "tags": ["poll", "steemit"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:37:45
last_update2017-03-20 23:37:45
depth1
children6
net_rshares16,443,156,683,016
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length88
author_reputation245,470,891,568,503
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout0.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (46)
@coloured-content ·
There is a fee now? 

Last I checked SP was still being given out for account creation...

I guess weve passed that stage?
properties (22)
post_id2,205,107
authorcoloured-content
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-11-20170321t044057873z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 04:40:54
last_update2017-03-21 04:40:54
depth2
children5
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length122
author_reputation32,775,970,160,151
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@jesta ·
$0.02
There's always been a fee. Steemit.com has just been paying the fee everytime someone signs up. 

The old (fee based) model still exists and isn't going away, but this is a new way of creating accounts by paying a smaller fee and then delegating something like 11x the fee as SP to the account.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,205,128
authorjesta
permlinkre-coloured-content-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-11-20170321t044343109z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 04:43:42
last_update2017-03-21 04:43:42
depth3
children0
net_rshares40,783,240,405
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.017 SBD
curator_payout_value0.005 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length294
author_reputation140,173,741,834,676
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@smooth ·
The word fee is somewhat misleading. The amount of the 'fee' ends up as SP in the new account. It would be better termed 'initial SP balance'
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
post_id2,215,398
authorsmooth
permlinkre-coloured-content-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-11-20170322t034114600z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-22 03:41:12
last_update2017-03-22 03:41:12
depth3
children3
net_rshares2,909,022,950
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length141
author_reputation83,817,235,636,416
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@clayop ·
properties (23)
post_id2,203,329
authorclayop
permlinkre-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-12
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"format": "markdown", "tags": ["poll", "steemit"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:38:15
last_update2017-03-20 23:38:15
depth1
children32
net_rshares9,413,124,816,601
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length28
author_reputation245,470,891,568,503
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout0.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (67)
@leesunmoo ·
(I misunderstood the parent's writing) .... I want to see it all ... Is there a way to cancel the upvote in the comment?
πŸ‘Ž  
properties (23)
post_id2,203,486
authorleesunmoo
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-12-20170320t235715064z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:57:15
last_update2017-03-20 23:57:15
depth2
children2
net_rshares-893,072,114
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length120
author_reputation176,920,345,078,243
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@dwinblood ·
Just click on the vote again.   By the way PoW is mining.   We mine with words.   So removing PoW is removing people being able to mine the currency with computers like other crypto currencies.    In reality, this is not needed by the steem blockchain at all.    Yet PoW = Proof of Work which is related to mining rigs and using devices/computers to mine crypto currency.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,203,551
authordwinblood
permlinkre-leesunmoo-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-12-20170321t000631890z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 00:06:27
last_update2017-03-21 00:06:27
depth3
children1
net_rshares364,257,327
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length371
author_reputation223,300,085,257,919
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@liondani ·
I invite @steemed to explain us the benefits of keeping 2 PoW slots
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
post_id2,203,802
authorliondani
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-12-20170321t005349007z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["steemed"], "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 00:53:48
last_update2017-03-21 00:53:48
depth2
children0
net_rshares12,043,468,966
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length67
author_reputation76,246,905,464,437
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@fubar-bdhr ·
Been dead for months really.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,204,122
authorfubar-bdhr
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-12-20170321t013729502z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 01:37:30
last_update2017-03-21 01:37:30
depth2
children0
net_rshares11,984,630,830
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length28
author_reputation61,031,712,426,864
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@remlaps ·
I understand that PoW is no longer providing much security for the network, but I've seen at least one talk by @ned on youtube where he highlights the ability to mine an anonymous account as a selling point.  I think that capability should be retained.
properties (22)
post_id2,204,918
authorremlaps
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-12-20170321t040431210z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["ned"], "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 04:04:36
last_update2017-03-21 04:04:36
depth2
children6
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length252
author_reputation26,915,348,039,269
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@tibonova ·
You could do the same via a username dedicated for creating anonymous accounts by paying it's fees. 
If it's a 3rd party, you could pay for it with a cryptocurrency that offers anon transactions. 
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,208,172
authortibonova
permlinkre-remlaps-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-12-20170321t131156866z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "busy/1.0.0", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 13:11:57
last_update2017-03-21 13:11:57
depth3
children5
net_rshares14,886,818,803
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length196
author_reputation12,882,495,516,931
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@coloured-content ·
(Maybe I'm stupid because I haven't read the white paper? )    ....   What is PoW??
properties (22)
post_id2,205,056
authorcoloured-content
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-12-20170321t043209748z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 04:32:06
last_update2017-03-21 04:32:06
depth2
children16
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length83
author_reputation32,775,970,160,151
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@jesta ·
Proof of Work - or mining.

It has problems right now and has been that way for the last few versions. The decision was made to remove it rather than constantly spend time trying to fix it.
properties (22)
post_id2,205,176
authorjesta
permlinkre-coloured-content-re-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-12-20170321t045356580z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 04:53:57
last_update2017-03-21 04:53:57
depth3
children15
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length189
author_reputation140,173,741,834,676
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@tibonova ·
Those rewards could be better spent. We have enough witnesses, and being a witness or contributing to the network is good for distribution. We could save developer time, make Steem simpler, explain Steem easier. It's not that great selling point, but Steem would be a really green tech. 
properties (22)
post_id2,208,220
authortibonova
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-12-20170321t131708073z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "busy/1.0.0", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 13:17:09
last_update2017-03-21 13:17:09
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length287
author_reputation12,882,495,516,931
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@leprechaun ·
PoW gives a person who is not popular a chance to be a witness once.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,211,149
authorleprechaun
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-12-20170321t182518567z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 18:25:27
last_update2017-03-21 18:25:27
depth2
children0
net_rshares12,486,236,705
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length68
author_reputation2,563,828,015,694
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@fyrstikken · (edited)
There is no need for external PoW - it has been dead for months, sign up as a witness instead.
edit: Also removing PoW removes a risk-factor (not that we know of any) so just kill it.
properties (22)
post_id2,215,339
authorfyrstikken
permlinkre-clayop-re-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-12-20170322t033400049z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-22 03:33:57
last_update2017-03-22 03:35:18
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length183
author_reputation352,100,520,168,452
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@dimimp ·
great idea!
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
post_id2,203,337
authordimimp
permlinkre-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170320t233939117z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:39:39
last_update2017-03-20 23:39:39
depth1
children0
net_rshares97,384,784,206
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length11
author_reputation116,890,112,812,438
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@leesunmoo · (edited)
이런 μ  μž₯.... λ‚˜λŠ” λͺ¨λ‘ λ³΄κ³ μ‹Άμ–΄μš”... λŒ“κΈ€μ— μΆ”μ²œν•œκ±Έμ„ μ·¨μ†Œν•  방법이 μžˆμŠ΅λ‹ˆκΉŒ?

(I misunderstood the parent's writing) .... I want to see it all ... Is there a way to cancel the upvote in the comment?
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,203,367
authorleesunmoo
permlinkre-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170320t234342701z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:43:42
last_update2017-03-20 23:50:30
depth1
children0
net_rshares475,715,563
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length170
author_reputation176,920,345,078,243
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@jaki01 ·
Funny: it seems @leesunmo immediately balances my flags even if in this case a flag is only an opinion if the idea is useful or not .......
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,203,373
authorjaki01
permlinkre-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170320t234404024z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["leesunmo"], "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:44:03
last_update2017-03-20 23:44:03
depth1
children3
net_rshares475,715,563
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length139
author_reputation196,990,119,859,098
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@businesswri ·
Nice idea :)
properties (22)
post_id2,203,390
authorbusinesswri
permlinkre-jaki01-re-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170320t234611536z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:46:09
last_update2017-03-20 23:46:09
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length12
author_reputation16,343,058,427,231
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@timcliff ·
interesting scenario
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,203,430
authortimcliff
permlinkre-jaki01-re-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170320t235039555z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:50:36
last_update2017-03-20 23:50:36
depth2
children0
net_rshares2,642,789,189
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length20
author_reputation247,995,867,762,997
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@jaki01 ·
Maybe it happened just accidentally though - no idea. :)
properties (22)
post_id2,203,524
authorjaki01
permlinkre-jaki01-re-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170321t000308039z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 00:03:09
last_update2017-03-21 00:03:09
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length56
author_reputation196,990,119,859,098
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@steemitqa ·
Good.
properties (22)
post_id2,203,398
authorsteemitqa
permlinkre-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170320t234710883z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:47:09
last_update2017-03-20 23:47:09
depth1
children1
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length5
author_reputation15,174,385,435,089
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@businesswri ·
Bad :d
properties (22)
post_id2,214,846
authorbusinesswri
permlinkre-steemitqa-re-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170322t021301648z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-22 02:12:57
last_update2017-03-22 02:12:57
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length6
author_reputation16,343,058,427,231
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@timcliff ·
$0.08
> 5. All comments are paid out 7 days after creation and there is no longer a second payout window

Can you add something here to differentiate between "as-is" and with a fix for the 'end of window' lockout issue (https://github.com/steemit/steem/issues/900). I support the change, but only with a fix for issue 900.
πŸ‘  , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,203,420
authortimcliff
permlinkre-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170320t234944868z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "links": ["https://github.com/steemit/steem/issues/900"], "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:49:45
last_update2017-03-20 23:49:45
depth1
children2
net_rshares137,171,100,568
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.059 SBD
curator_payout_value0.019 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length316
author_reputation247,995,867,762,997
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@clayop ·
Okay, but I am on the road now. Will do later
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,203,593
authorclayop
permlinkre-timcliff-re-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170321t001231908z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 00:12:33
last_update2017-03-21 00:12:33
depth2
children0
net_rshares4,053,236,035
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length45
author_reputation245,470,891,568,503
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@sneak ·
If that's an issue, back 17 and let's schedule your proposed lockout fix for HF18.  We don't have the luxury of time.
properties (22)
post_id2,218,256
authorsneak
permlinkre-timcliff-re-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170322t124617906z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-22 12:44:27
last_update2017-03-22 12:44:27
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length117
author_reputation26,370,059,584,861
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@kingscrown ·
$1.55
properties (23)
post_id2,203,483
authorkingscrown
permlinkre-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170320t235713120z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-20 23:57:12
last_update2017-03-20 23:57:12
depth1
children0
net_rshares1,873,443,354,205
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.166 SBD
curator_payout_value0.388 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length13
author_reputation1,183,949,922,229,304
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (7)
@luisucv34 ·
Excellent idea
properties (22)
post_id2,203,747
authorluisucv34
permlinkre-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170321t011219023z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 00:41:33
last_update2017-03-21 00:41:33
depth1
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length14
author_reputation82,751,862,601,752
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@freebornangel · (edited)
1.  don't care, like the idea of a curve to discourage over posting, rate tbd.
2. yes
3. yes
4. comments pay in 4 hours?
5. No, 3 days and 10 days, or remain the same.
6. Depends, competing with discus is a good thing, sigmajin's 12% math needs to be rechecked to determine percentage.
7. Why?
8. ???
9. yes
10. no
11. no 
12. yes, add more witnesses.

My voting weight is too low to make much difference because giving out those pennies is addictive when the content is this level of good.
πŸ‘  , , ,
properties (23)
post_id2,203,997
authorfreebornangel
permlinkre-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170321t012233520z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 01:22:36
last_update2017-03-21 01:29:36
depth1
children1
net_rshares25,802,629,887
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length490
author_reputation75,857,757,502,918
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@ebryans ·
I won the whale vote contest - watch out! Good things coming!
properties (22)
post_id2,205,315
authorebryans
permlinkre-freebornangel-re-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170321t052500931z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 05:25:00
last_update2017-03-21 05:25:00
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length61
author_reputation40,947,012,609,239
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@fubar-bdhr ·
$0.08
I share the opinion that while a lot of these things may be good it's too much in one release.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
post_id2,204,186
authorfubar-bdhr
permlinkre-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170321t014655689z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 01:46:57
last_update2017-03-21 01:46:57
depth1
children0
net_rshares133,980,422,552
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.058 SBD
curator_payout_value0.019 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length94
author_reputation61,031,712,426,864
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@crystalandbones ·
I know that none of you really know who I am but I have to tell you, nobody has time for this.  Witnesses and dissenters need to get on board or risk getting left behind. 
It's witnesses job to make sure steemit doesn't break, not to create riffs and dissent amount the community, holding up important production. We need to move forward, it's quintessential to our long term growth and productivity. 
Please understand that time is of the essence.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,209,948
authorcrystalandbones
permlinkre-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170321t163033966z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 16:30:33
last_update2017-03-21 16:30:33
depth1
children0
net_rshares2,317,399,564
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length448
author_reputation2,782,559,402,207
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@leprechaun ·
i think PoW should stay.   I have never benefited personally from it but when you have an old club of people who vote for each other only, it is nice to have a way to get your foot in the door.
properties (22)
post_id2,211,075
authorleprechaun
permlinkre-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170321t181734128z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-21 18:17:42
last_update2017-03-21 18:17:42
depth1
children2
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length193
author_reputation2,563,828,015,694
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@businesswri · (edited)
Make PoW Great Again :d
properties (22)
post_id2,214,843
authorbusinesswri
permlinkre-leprechaun-re-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170322t021228359z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-22 02:12:24
last_update2017-03-22 02:12:39
depth2
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length23
author_reputation16,343,058,427,231
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@sneak ·
$0.05
It is already gone; there is a bug in the current PoW implementation that renders it meaningless.  This just removes it to clean up the code, as it is presently superfluous.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,218,262
authorsneak
permlinkre-leprechaun-re-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170322t124717067z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-22 12:45:27
last_update2017-03-22 12:45:27
depth2
children0
net_rshares359,073,436,233
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.048 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length173
author_reputation26,370,059,584,861
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@everittdmickey ·
How bout just do one thing at a time?
properties (22)
post_id2,215,654
authoreverittdmickey
permlinkre-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170322t042332103z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-22 04:23:33
last_update2017-03-22 04:23:33
depth1
children1
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length37
author_reputation235,023,403,436,502
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@sneak ·
$0.05
Hardforks have a real and tangible cost.  There is first the matter of time spent communicating the proposals, discussing the change(s) with the community, and integrating the feedback.  Then there is the burden on third-party users of the software, such as exchanges and witnesses, that need to spend time or money on testing and integration and deployment.

I agree that there's too much in this one, but we also want to err on the side of bigger batches because each release  incurs substantial overhead and we don't have the luxury of time.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,218,279
authorsneak
permlinkre-everittdmickey-re-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170322t124900075z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-22 12:47:09
last_update2017-03-22 12:47:09
depth2
children0
net_rshares371,445,782,728
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.048 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length544
author_reputation26,370,059,584,861
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@chrisaiki ·
Are we experimenting a start of democracy, here, on Steemit ?
properties (22)
post_id2,217,202
authorchrisaiki
permlinkre-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170322t093910049z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "steemit/0.1", "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-22 09:39:18
last_update2017-03-22 09:39:18
depth1
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length61
author_reputation17,919,807,223,753
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
@uwelang ·
Upvoting what I like and not voting the rest, wanna avoid downvoting at all @clayop 😎
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
post_id2,217,514
authoruwelang
permlinkre-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-2017322t113842867z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"app": "esteem/1.4.0", "format": "markdown+html", "tags": "poll"}"
created2017-03-22 10:38:45
last_update2017-03-22 10:38:45
depth1
children0
net_rshares6,043,575,017
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length85
author_reputation280,399,850,522,379
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@shadowspub ·
http://i.imgur.com/SsfejKK.jpg
Hi @clayop, I just stopped back to let you know your post was one of my favourite reads and I included it in my Steemit Ramble. [You can read what I wrote about your post here.](https://steemit.com/curation/@shadowspub/mar-21-steemit-ramble-82-don-t-you-hate-missing-good-posts)
properties (22)
post_id2,238,722
authorshadowspub
permlinkre-clayop-poll-your-opinions-on-hardfork-17-features-20170324t161136369z
categorypoll
json_metadata"{"links": ["https://steemit.com/curation/@shadowspub/mar-21-steemit-ramble-82-don-t-you-hate-missing-good-posts"], "app": "steemit/0.1", "users": ["clayop"], "image": ["http://i.imgur.com/SsfejKK.jpg"], "tags": ["poll"]}"
created2017-03-24 16:11:36
last_update2017-03-24 16:11:36
depth1
children0
net_rshares0
last_payout2017-04-21 14:34:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length309
author_reputation80,455,466,172,351
root_title"[Poll] Your Opinions on Hardfork 17 Features"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000