Warning: Steem witnesses executed a hard fork on 2020-05-20, seizing 23.6M STEEM from 65 accounts. The funds were transferred to an account named @community321, the ownership (and intentions) of which have not been revealed. The witnesses claim to have been targeting accounts which defended against a hostile takeover in early March, but at least 2 accounts on the list have been inactive for over 4 years.

Coverage:
- Decrypt.io: Steem network to seize $5 million from its own users
- SteemPeak.com: Official Announcement by @softfork22888
- GitHub.com: view steemd HF23 changes

What you can do:
- Send exchanges a notice of the pending class action lawsuit.
- Switch to HIVE, the community-led fork. Visit Hive.blog and Hiveblocks.com.

RE: OPEN LETTER TO @WHALES: please be mindfull with your MASS-DOWNVOTES before it's to late by crypto.piotr

View this thread on steempeak.com

Viewing a response to: @futuremind/re-cryptopiotr-pxdar2

· @crypto.piotr ·
Good morning @futuremind

> I recently responded to one of your tags, and you didn't even respond back.. Perhaps it just wasn't drama oriented enough for you?

I'm sorry for not replying earlier. I've been sick for couple of days and I'm only slowly catching up with replying to all comments. I surely didn't mean to ignore you and I appreciate your time.

It's sad to know that you think that all I care about is creating dramma. I hope you can see my point of view: this post wasn't about me and about any dramma at all. I tried (in the most polite and mature way) bring up issue that is really affecting many users.

Personally I know several users, who has been affected with mass downvotes and some of them already decided to quit this platform. I still see it as a problem and please allow me to give you another great example: @ulqu3 

This user just posted something after being away for quite some time. He then upvoted his publication using bidbots and got heavily downvoted. Which would be okey, as long as someone would bother to inform him why is he being flagged by so many people.

This is the problem I've been trying to underline. It's important to create healthy mindset of those powerful stakeholders. It's not about creating dramma (as you suggested in other comment).

Thank you again for your reply.

Yours,
Piotr
👍  
properties (23)
post_id79,992,502
authorcrypto.piotr
permlinkpxta1d
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"users":["futuremind","ulqu3"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-09-14 07:55:39
last_update2019-09-14 07:55:39
depth5
children2
net_rshares70,164,069,646
last_payout2019-09-21 07:55:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,335
author_reputation97,224,961,037,490
root_title"OPEN LETTER TO @WHALES: please be mindfull with your MASS-DOWNVOTES before it's to late"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars0
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@futuremind · (edited)
Yes, the drama comment was unfair of me to say. I was wrong for that Piotr. I really don't think you are drama oriented. I was in a shitty mood, and shouldn't have even responded in that moment. 
I am sorry for saying that. 

I actually very much agree with the downvote problem. If a large stake holder is going to take away someones rewards, they certainly should comment with reason. I really wish downvotes were never implemented into the system to begin with. There are some logical arguments to why they need to be there, but I see mostly negative outcomes from the implementation, and I think a better system could have been designed. 

I'm a top stake holder in the weedcash community. It's very specific to cannabis related content. We try to keep it on topic, and we utilize flags when necessary. We have a specific system though, where if a user posts out of context, they get a free pass on the first post. We notify them that they have utilized the tag incorrectly, and no flag is given. If they continue to post out of context, then we flag. Some might even disagree with this system as well, but the idea is to show some compassion, because it could be a new user who just made a mistake. We want to encourage, not discourage. 

It's easier in the niche tribe communities that are specific to topics, but not so easy in the main tags, because it comes down to difference of opinion, and we are not all going to agree on things. In this sense, I see flags as inefficient and detrimental to the ecosytem, and as you stated, something that has the potential to influence people to quit completely. That is a loss for steem. 

When I say you jumped into the snake pit, I do not mean it in a drama oriented way, and stated it was something that I felt admiration for, because it takes courage to talk about something that could result in flags. I do feel you are pretty courageous.

Thank you again for responding maturely to my rather immature comment. 

PS. I hope you are making a quick recovery and feeling better. 

Best regards,
@futuremind 

👍  
properties (23)
post_id79,994,157
authorfuturemind
permlinkre-cryptopiotr-pxteh0
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steempeak\/1.16.1"}
created2019-09-14 09:31:51
last_update2019-09-14 09:38:57
depth6
children1
net_rshares8,578,426,041
last_payout2019-09-21 09:31:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length2,059
author_reputation129,154,966,501,488
root_title"OPEN LETTER TO @WHALES: please be mindfull with your MASS-DOWNVOTES before it's to late"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars10,000
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@crypto.piotr ·
> I am sorry for saying that.

Thank you for your words. Appology happily accepted :)

> I really wish downvotes were never implemented into the system to begin with. There are some logical arguments to why they need to be there

Indeed. Downvotes are nothing more than "patch" to wrongly designed token ecosystem.

In my opinion all that would need to be done is to create "whitelist" of accounts that are allowed to receive rewards from their work (which would make it a huge privillage, not a right).

Everyone could have an option of commenting, upvoting etc. But only those who would be whitelisted would enjoy those extra benefits (rewards). 

Thx for sharing your experience in stake holder in the weedcash community. 

> We want to encourage, not discourage

You nailed it! Punishing is short-term solution. Building awareness is what really help solve problems.

> because it takes courage to talk about something that could result in flags. I do feel you are pretty courageous.

Thank you. Flags would only take away some of my reward. That's not a big deal. I'm more worried about "regular joes" who will feel targeted and will quit steemit. I've lost already few steemit-friends lately because of that. And it's more painful to see them go away than to see some of my rewards being taken down from me.

> I hope you are making a quick recovery and feeling better.

Thx buddy. I got better already :)

Yours
Piotr
👍  
properties (23)
post_id80,021,119
authorcrypto.piotr
permlinkpxvbur
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit\/0.1"}
created2019-09-15 10:30:03
last_update2019-09-15 10:30:03
depth7
children0
net_rshares2,746,087,656
last_payout2019-09-22 10:30:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 SBD
curator_payout_value0.000 SBD
pending_payout_value0.000 SBD
promoted0.000 SBD
body_length1,424
author_reputation97,224,961,037,490
root_title"OPEN LETTER TO @WHALES: please be mindfull with your MASS-DOWNVOTES before it's to late"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 SBD
percent_steem_dollars0
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)