Tx 3007ef21a8539959a223993534c06a8c0d6f8bfd@31188138
Included in block
31,188,138
at 2019-03-15 23:40:03 (UTC)
Raw transaction
| ref_block_num | 58,518 |
|---|
| ref_block_prefix | 2,743,754,259 |
|---|
| expiration | 2019-03-15 23:49:57 |
|---|
| operations | | 0. | | 0. | comment |
|---|
| 1. | | parent_author | baah |
|---|
| parent_permlink | baah-re-lucylin-re-baah-baah-re-lucylin-who-is-baah-who-cares-information-warfare-up-close-and-personal-20190315t145347065z |
|---|
| author | lucylin |
|---|
| permlink | re-baah-baah-re-lucylin-re-baah-baah-re-lucylin-who-is-baah-who-cares-information-warfare-up-close-and-personal-20190315t233947493z |
|---|
| title | "" |
|---|
| body | ">All you did was repeat that "no property rights encourages unethical behavior" failing to see that if no property rights are violated and everyone consents there is no such thing as unethical behavior and there cannot be, after all, without property rights how can there be a victim or victimizer?
So we agree.
So we agree that steem(it) - as a platform - has no ethical code.
Social structures without ethics do not survive.
(they do not function properly as we can see from steemit).
Which is my point." |
|---|
| json_metadata | {"tags":["blog"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
|---|
|
|---|
|
|---|
|
|---|
| extensions | [] |
|---|
| signatures | | 0. | 200c9f3619c80ed75107f6f617b0f13866bda9380398aceab3b61f87741a90f4174e8ca7e561c22d3e25a81d0befbe23b247ba1b08e6b9ca04b566e03abd483a26 |
|---|
|
|---|
| transaction_id | 3007ef21a8539959a223993534c06a8c0d6f8bfd |
|---|
| block_num | 31,188,138 |
|---|
| transaction_num | 3 |
|---|