Tx 76510a90335afd38f9c54315d58cb56bb8fc927e@33172796
Included in block
33,172,796
at 2019-05-23 23:50:15 (UTC)
Raw transaction
ref_block_num | 11,562 |
---|
ref_block_prefix | 1,527,884,659 |
---|
expiration | 2019-05-24 00:00:09 |
---|
operations | 0. | 0. | comment |
---|
1. | parent_author | "" |
---|
parent_permlink | money |
---|
author | full-measure |
---|
permlink | does-money-have-to-have-a-different-use-before-it-can-be-money |
---|
title | "Does money have to have a different use before it can be money? 💰" |
---|
body | "@@ -2059,41 +2059,41 @@
is.
+(
It
-would just need *any* use (not
+can't be based on whether you
sub
@@ -2106,94 +2106,94 @@
ely
+consider it
a
-%22
good
-%22 use or enough of a use). And then it passes the test and can qualify as money
+ enough use.) It would just need *any* use, to satisfy that criteria
.%0A%0A(
@@ -2336,21 +2336,41 @@
he same
-thing
+as what happens with gold
. It's a
@@ -2404,17 +2404,43 @@
t use. (
-B
+And personally I consider b
eing abl
@@ -2475,19 +2475,13 @@
to
-someone els
+anyon
e wi
@@ -2509,22 +2509,36 @@
sorship
-is the
+to be a really great
inheren
@@ -2574,117 +2574,120 @@
and
-monetary use as a function of that.%0A%0AThe only difference is the degree or amount of utility outside of money.
+the belief that it would make a good currency from there.%0A%0ASame as gold. Just different uses. Plays out faster.
%0A%0AAn
" |
---|
json_metadata | {"tags":["money","bitcoin","economics","peterschiff","austrianeconomics"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"} |
---|
|
---|
|
---|
|
---|
extensions | [] |
---|
signatures | 0. | 207038b9fc8808ac2450037d1861c33c3a705a8802662d50c1e82f13802478059012dc898f9f40e71b9bc1f4ea613f60d489ceaf5f461f964f3bb7ac85875504f4 |
---|
|
---|
transaction_id | 76510a90335afd38f9c54315d58cb56bb8fc927e |
---|
block_num | 33,172,796 |
---|
transaction_num | 12 |
---|