Tx 7d9d85eff0ca14f078856ebbb663c60263a7e8e1@16998600

Included in block 16,998,600 at 2017-11-07 00:15:06 (UTC)


Raw transaction

ref_block_num24,757
ref_block_prefix3,372,379,802
expiration2017-11-07 00:25:03
operations
0.
0.comment
1.
parent_authorstellabelle
parent_permlinkmoney-cannot-replace-integrity-why-i-still-vote-according-to-my-inner-compass-instead-of-max-roi
authorats-david
permlinkre-stellabelle-money-cannot-replace-integrity-why-i-still-vote-according-to-my-inner-compass-instead-of-max-roi-20171107t001503663z
title""
body"The issue with curation incentives isn’t anything new. This is something I wrote...from nine months ago.
https://steemit.com/steemit/@ats-david/on-curation-rewards-and-their-necessity
For the record: I find the “it’s so much more profitable” argument to be quite poor, especially when it comes from whales who can earn fairly large returns by voting on nearly *anything.* And I find it a particularly horrible argument when they then try to claim that they’re only trying to prove a point or that they really do want to improve the platform/community. If you want more money than you’re getting, then just say that. Don’t try to qualify it by saying, “It’s not my fault, guys!”
Anyway - curation rewards may be *part* of the problem, but it isn’t *the* problem, or even one of the prominent ones today. There are much bigger issues...and the largest one (the stake issue - particularly, STINC’s enormous percentage) has still not been addressed. That alone likely has the largest and worst impact on interest, investment, development, and sentiment/behavior. To this day, they are still moving things behind the scenes and picking winners/losers on the platform."
json_metadata{"tags":["whales"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@ats-david/on-curation-rewards-and-their-necessity"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
extensions[]
signatures
0.2033f26529ddbcca50b81db873ac53d62103bf04ced152d4f77d556faab820fa0568d7c2abd3d984aa0455a1872041b543d48428044083d7028da194bd3322fb15
transaction_id7d9d85eff0ca14f078856ebbb663c60263a7e8e1
block_num16,998,600
transaction_num3