Tx 89d661fc2742e46d16091945b7fd0ca0509b3bb5@17453979
Included in block
17,453,979
at 2017-11-22 19:56:48 (UTC)
Raw transaction
ref_block_num | 21,385 |
---|
ref_block_prefix | 2,227,762,876 |
---|
expiration | 2017-11-22 20:06:42 |
---|
operations | 0. | 0. | comment |
---|
1. | parent_author | americaurusrex |
---|
parent_permlink | mer-re-personz-re-dreemit-re-personz-re-dreemit-re-americaurusrex-re-canadian-coconut-re-americaurusrex-re-canadian-coconut-re-americaurusrex-re-canadian-coconut-re-americaurusrex-re-marymg2014-putting-a-face-to-the-dangers-of-vaccines-20171122t054146033z |
---|
author | valued-customer |
---|
permlink | mer-re-personz-re-dreemit-re-personz-re-dreemit-re-americaurusrex-re-canadian-coconut-re-americaurusrex-re-canadian-coconut-re-americaurusrex-re-canadian-coconut-re-americaurusrex-re-marymg2014-putting-a-face-to-the-dangers-of-vaccines-20171122t195636495z |
---|
title | "" |
---|
body | "First, I used the word 'practically', which indicates you implied those charges, rather than stated them outright, which isn't hyperbolic, but factual.
>"Blaming your slew of allergies and health issues on vaccines is a bit odd. And frankly, telling people not to get vaccinated is irresponsible."
>"How would it make you feel if you knew that some elderly immunocompromised person read this, and thought the flu vaccine would give them 100 allergies (it won't), then refused to get it and died from the flu."
>"People die from the flu. Do you realize that. Thousands of people die from the flu every year."
You are implying she is abusing her professional capacity, and potentially for the deaths of thousands. This is exactly what I said you did.
I certainly agree with you as to the flaws on Steemit, and few have railed against them as have I. @personz may recall this from our initial conversations regarding such matters months ago.
That doesn't make the caution you were availed of less true. Reading @canadian-coconut's comment as a threat is facile, because she clearly and repeatedly stated her intention to not flag you, but that others would, in the circumstances.
She warned you of negative consequences, because she wanted to enable you to avoid them, and clearly stated that. I don't praise her for simply not flagging you, but for taking enough interest and having enough concern for a relatively new user to offer her advice - despite your having flagged her.
That is praiseworthy.
Your continued belligerence towards her and Mary, accusatory tone, coupled with absolute refusal to comment on the voluminous evidence provided, are plays from disinfo playbooks.
You are using tactics blatantly drawn from the rules for shills, and I am losing respect for you by the minute.
Should you present any evidence, examine that provided, or in any way pursue substantive debate rather than disinfo tactical shilling, I'll recant.
You won't. You're a shill.
Begone!" |
---|
json_metadata | {"tags":["vaccines"],"users":["personz","canadian-coconut"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
---|
|
---|
|
---|
|
---|
extensions | [] |
---|
signatures | 0. | 2062b009fe54fe0e1a8f1ca8890033e785964144ccf14e2ca18981d9297867940977ee166ad0c1d68a37624e8c70fffa2549e3d9b89b0a2fc59d0743c95c9fdfe8 |
---|
|
---|
transaction_id | 89d661fc2742e46d16091945b7fd0ca0509b3bb5 |
---|
block_num | 17,453,979 |
---|
transaction_num | 10 |
---|