Tx c0a558207bf96c3d19236143cd55d5499373f758@45739380
Included in block
45,739,380
at 2020-08-05 23:43:09 (UTC)
Raw transaction
ref_block_num | 60,768 |
---|
ref_block_prefix | 665,359,430 |
---|
expiration | 2020-08-05 23:53:03 |
---|
operations | 0. | 0. | comment |
---|
1. | parent_author | steemcurator01 |
---|
parent_permlink | qem5ii |
---|
author | remlaps |
---|
permlink | qem77t |
---|
title | "" |
---|
body | "> At the low end of the SP scale the rewards are so very small as to make a curation not worthwhile.
Yeah, this is something I was thinking about after I made this post. There's a bit of a paradox here. The smaller accounts are the ones that are best able to increase their returns by discovering attractive content and front-running the bigger voters, but the incentive is not really there to get them to spend a lot of time doing it.
Your idea of rewarding people in the diary game for powering up 100% might help with that. Lots of people can spend less time per person and accomplish the same thing. I was also thinking it might encourage investment to have the web site report curation rewards as a percentage, in addition to the 7-day total. (with constant influx from rewards and interest, possible outflows from power-downs, and potential delegations in both directions, I realize that this isn't as easy as it sounds, though...)
I've also had a long-time idea of having a curation league, where people could compete for the best curation percentage during a period of time like a week or a month, but it seems pretty hard to prevent someone from cheating by following themselves with alt-accounts, so I'm not sure how well that would work.
> It would be interesting to present some numbers to newcomers particularly to show how accumulating SP can begin to bring them curation rewards.
I agree with this. It would probably be good to automate the kind of collection that I did here, run it regularly, and incorporate many more accounts into the analysis so people can get a real idea of what their investment can get them. Again, easier said then done, though..." |
---|
json_metadata | {"app":"steemit/0.2"} |
---|
|
---|
|
---|
|
---|
extensions | [] |
---|
signatures | 0. | 1f405de5940b47cb07dcda512cdb2cb298b52a6cccf5d779bddab2171bf81e60d007a3235ff166ba20041407783d79c868fadc7fa28bf9aee4092a70073472ac29 |
---|
|
---|
transaction_id | c0a558207bf96c3d19236143cd55d5499373f758 |
---|
block_num | 45,739,380 |
---|
transaction_num | 0 |
---|