Tx c4e18e1cac29fd219410f982d0b34e47fbe3b8e3@40858372
Included in block
40,858,372
at 2020-02-16 03:15:42 (UTC)
Raw transaction
ref_block_num | 29,423 |
---|
ref_block_prefix | 4,294,236,429 |
---|
expiration | 2020-02-16 03:25:36 |
---|
operations | 0. | 0. | comment |
---|
1. | parent_author | jarvie |
---|
parent_permlink | re-jarvie-q5qxbj |
---|
author | cryptoeater |
---|
permlink | re-jarvie-q5rye2 |
---|
title | "" |
---|
body | "Exactly! I 100% agree with the do not combine sentiment. I combined thousands of BCX worth of Mushroom Seers and Flame Imps which are now worth less than half they would be if I didn't combine them. I have pretty much combined no cards since then.
With the cost of this, there's going to be a lot of arbitrage opportunities at the start but ideally, these opportunities will disappear as the price/single and price/BCX converges to ~10% difference.
I think the DEC cost is fair, 25% of DEC burn rate of the card, so in this case 7.5 DECs per card or 862.5 DECs for a max level Flame Imp. This might be a small amount but with thousands of cards being uncombined it'll add up, plus it'll generate a lot of demand at the start if we include a guild structure that can reduce the DEC cost of uncombining.
Your alpha cards example is actually why I'm raising this point again, many months after I first mentioned this idea publically on Discord. I have tens of thousands of alpha cards which I simply am not able to sell. Out there, there are people who are missing a few alpha cards for the next level and don't want to pay a 200-300% premium just to combine it into their existent card and destroy that value.
## I believe for the longevity and long term health of the markets, particularly alpha and beta markets as more and more cards get combined, allowing an uncombine feature at a small cost is vital. " |
---|
json_metadata | {"tags":["splinterlands"],"app":"steempeak/2.2.8"} |
---|
|
---|
|
---|
|
---|
extensions | [] |
---|
signatures | 0. | 1f0586eba5b74fba3a52741c022b975dfc721593dc1de36ce7fcf5365dad649fda2bfb473c9f838e43a5f13b7ec7399b98394faccb5406381086e88963d316453b |
---|
|
---|
transaction_id | c4e18e1cac29fd219410f982d0b34e47fbe3b8e3 |
---|
block_num | 40,858,372 |
---|
transaction_num | 33 |
---|