Tx f5bba52b6f75075e7080fbf3dbe44f8671cf6a9b@26131597

Included in block 26,131,597 at 2018-09-21 06:35:42 (UTC)

Raw transaction

ref_block_num48,252
ref_block_prefix1,304,781,057
expiration2018-09-21 06:45:39
operations
0.
0.comment
1.
parent_authorknircky
parent_permlinkdlive-is-leaving-steem
authormarkkujantunen
permlinkre-knircky-dlive-is-leaving-steem-20180921t063539586z
title""
body"While a setback this is not catastrophic. DLive received a very large delegation and being on Steem helped it grow its user base. I have to wonder why they chose to leave now with all the development coming up on Steem in the next six months. Will DLive come around to a different point of view when the SMT protocol is released and when they have an opportunity to create an SMT of their own and tailor its distribution to their own liking, remedying the the problems with STEEM distribution they cited in their announcement? It will be harder to get a delegation from Steemit Inc then. And what's wrong with the idea of being a multi-chain app? Why not give DLive users an opportunity to earn whatever tokens the new blockchain distributes AND STEEM, SBD, SP and an SMT of their own? The video files and streams will not be stored on the Steem blockchain anyway, only hashes of them. The announcement did not go into any detail as to why DLive had to abandon the Steem blockchain in the first place and in such haste. There must be more to the story than we have been told. This reeks of a conflict between personalities."
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
extensions[]
signatures
0.20348c2a774d2b5822aa7f50ee60348407e91df0a7a0db539828081ba1bd5ca486092740f4e69e26d51a3ddadea32fabcf74b9f605aeed1408b6e4cc6eaea5b870
transaction_idf5bba52b6f75075e7080fbf3dbe44f8671cf6a9b
block_num26,131,597
transaction_num12
Help/Feedback