Tx f765e135a8634b3ce6edac553cd2cb4ed7333e3a@9925960
Included in block
9,925,960
at 2017-03-06 03:48:45 (UTC)
Raw transaction
ref_block_num | 29,720 |
---|
ref_block_prefix | 1,453,517,204 |
---|
expiration | 2017-03-06 03:48:57 |
---|
operations | 0. | 0. | comment |
---|
1. | parent_author | stellabelle |
---|
parent_permlink | re-abit-re-snowflake-re-liberosist-re-snowflake-a-case-for-eliminating-curation-rewards-20170306t000246277z |
---|
author | liberosist |
---|
permlink | re-stellabelle-re-abit-re-snowflake-re-liberosist-re-snowflake-a-case-for-eliminating-curation-rewards-20170306t034839820z |
---|
title | "" |
---|
body | "It is demonstrably valuable. The Trending page today is pretty diverse and shows the best of Steemit, once you get past the first 10-15 posts. There's a really long tail of good content. This is different from July/Aug when the Trending page was dominated by 20-30 authors - you will remember as you were one of them - and the thousands others (at the time) fighting for scraps, and most ending up with 0 cents or comments.
Today, with an organized curation community, it's nigh impossible for a new author creating good content to go unnoticed.
That said, I'll agree that much of the content on Steemit is mediocre, but that's to be expected of such a tiny community. When the quality of material on Steemit improves, the curation community will be there to make sure the new authors with the best content are given exposure and rewarded. Another problem of a tiny community is also that there are very few readers. Again, that can be solved by marketing and outreach programs." |
---|
json_metadata | {"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
---|
|
---|
|
---|
|
---|
extensions | [] |
---|
signatures | 0. | 1f137abd4b4fd4870c7c6170f45d1dbff1a767487e67f2994442d8be5fd8f98c4c7d69fa81595266778960455ed0a2168ba44cf3c45a6b700bcf35a3b8feda77e5 |
---|
|
---|
transaction_id | f765e135a8634b3ce6edac553cd2cb4ed7333e3a |
---|
block_num | 9,925,960 |
---|
transaction_num | 0 |
---|