Yeah, I can't even recall being that condescending before.  It really felt empowering, and I am quite grateful to you, and your employer, for the opportunity to cut loose like that.

However, I'm also quite sincere, particularly regarding my offense taken at being compelled to have virus contaminated vaccines injected directly into my little, innocent, baby body, and then to be lied to about it.

My comments about your professional qualifications are also heartfelt.  Srsly, you're doing quite well, especially at not rising to the bait of my condescension.  Kudos!

>"Look, this is what I meant about tautology. You cite the CDC, I point out that really they do agree with me on this."

Yet you fail to note the CDC are lying.  C'mon, it's blatant.  You'd clearly gain credibility by at least questioning it.  I realize it's against the SOP, but, in this case, I reckon my assertion that you are conducting psyops might outweigh that stricture, and give you leave to express intuitive, professional insight in order to create SOME mutual agreement.

You are capable of more refined work than your guidelines seem to permit, I suspect.

>"...the CDC is part of a massive conspiracy to <strike>hide the truth</strike> make bank..."  

FTFY  

>"...all these people dedicating their lives to the <strike>prevention of communicable disease</strike> superlative profitability of pharmaceutical companies...

That too.

Like all gummint agencies, the CDC is just a vehicle for the parties involved, a venue for the corruption to be undertaken in.

Sure there are some good, honest scientists, at the CDC, like Dr. John Compton, whom I alluded to earlier, who claims to have evidence his co-workers sought to destroy, linking (IIRC) MMR to autism, and seeks to be able to testify before Congress about it, but it's rare that someone rises to that level in such an organization without being fully dedicated to the mutual complicity in incessant profiteering with their ilk.  

More likely, pangs of conscience simply overcame his ability to 
keep it up any longer.  1/6 of American children is a lot of ghosts to hear moaning in your dreams...

I can't avoid noting your obvious intelligence, glaring ability to parse the science, and you must certainly not be so naive that your position on the sacred halls of government is sincere.  

You'll have to dissemble more; hide your intellectual capacity, in order to sell such naivete regarding the $B's of reasons government servants have to serve our children to Big Pharma.

You're quite right about the blockchain, and the permanence of our discourse here.  

I honestly am impressed at your ability to keep your temper, given such provocation as I undertook.  I really hate the purpose of your employers, but must confess my admiration for their competence in personnel matters.  

Do you have a graduate degree?  

I have a pretty good spiel against the smoking/lung cancer link.  Would you be kind enough to demolish my post regarding that should I make one?  

Frankly, I'd be honored.